Integral
Can't you hear it?
Small businesses don't. I agree that QE3 is likely to have little effect (especially if it's as small as QE2). But the Fed could and should also change the interest rate it pays banks on their excess reserves from +0.25% to something negative. That would help a little. Admittedly, not enough, but Congress is too insane to provide any fiscal stimulus, and Obama isn't the guy that could rally the public to change Congressional minds. Like Cutlass said, the Fed is all we have left.
Mah boy!
Things the Fed could do:
1. Negative IOR. Increase the interest paid on required reserves to compensate; the important effects are at the (non-required) margin.
2. Large-scale asset purchases (QE3). Not a number, like "$2 trillion", but a goal, like "we'll continue expansion until incomes are back to where they would have been pre-crisis." Or use a price target if an income target makes you squeamish.
3. Communicate its strategy in a coherent fashion. Other countries use inflation targets. That'd be a good start. A path for income or a path for prices would be better.
Is the problem not enough spending? Increased incomes should boost spending.
Is the problem debt overhang? Debts are denominated in nominal dollars, so increased incomes ease the debt burden.
Yes, banks and nonfinancial corporations are already awash with cash. That just tells me that there is unsatiated excess demand for money. Fill that demand and people/firms will start spending on newly-produced goods again.
Recessions are always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.
Back to basics. Aggregate Supply and Aggregate Demand.
AS is an upward-sloping curve in (P,Y) space. AD is downward-sloping.
AD is below the level where equilibrium would support full output/full employment.
So boost AD.
But what is AD? MV=PY defines a hyperbola in (P,Y) space. MV=PQ is AD. So increase M until AD is at a level consistent with full employment/full output.
Pretty soon I'm going to start sounding like a crank...