I thought that OotP was the longest and slowest book and could have done with being at least 100 pages shorter. Why did you despise TDH so much?
Am I right that Molly's obsession with housecleaning at 12 Grimmauld Place is one subplot that could have been handled with a lot fewer instances of it? I just read the part about all the mold, and given my own RL experiences with that, I can't imagine making kids scrub moldy surfaces with cleaning cloths. After all these centuries, surely some wizard or witch would have invented a mold-remediation spell.
And I now understand why someone wrote a fanfic in which Sirius finally has enough of Molly Weasley's bossiness, tells her off, and says if she can't STFU (paraphrasing slightly), she will be banished from the house. She doesn't believe him, so he carries out his threat (her husband and the kids are welcome to stay).
I really doubt the HP series will be around (as in read by relatively many) 100 years from now.
Probably even a few decades is a stretch.
Funny, people said the same of Shakespeare.
Not that I think Rowling is anywhere close to on par with Shakespeare; in fact, it's been determined that there is a suspicious amount of the basic premise for Harry Potter that was
thisclose to an earlier work by Ursula K. LeGuin (multi-award-winning SF/F author with a career spanning decades) - who expressed disgust that Rowling didn't have the integrity to acknowledge where she'd gotten some of her ideas.
I felt DH was characterized by Rowling not knowing how she wanted to get from A to B. Hence we have the 3 main characters moping around in a forest for months before Rowling decides she needs to kickstart the plot by having Harry go "I guess we should see where my parents died, because I've never done it and what better time than when we are being hunted by wizard nazis?". Insert some poorly written chase scenes, overly sentimental deaths, and a cutesy epilogue.
I have to agree regarding the chase scenes and all the stuff that happened in the tent and running through the forest. I remember watching those movies (they split the final novel into two movies) and wondering WTH was going on, for most of the time.
Except... Dobby's death was not "overly sentimental." I had no idea what the hell was happening for most of the final three movies, but I did really like Dobby. He didn't deserve what happened to him, and kudos to the filmmakers and Dobby's voice actor for making people care about him enough to cry during his death scene (some people cried over Yoda's death; would you consider
that "overly sentimental"?).
This confusion is yet another reason why I read fanfic. Now I finally get one of those chase scenes, because someone wrote a story explaining why the kids were being chased (in the forest, not in the diner). And yeah, the book/movies should have explained it better, but oh well.
One of the things I enjoyed most about Harry Potter was the school scenes and her efforts, however underwhelming in retrospect, to make the world seem alive. Deathly Hallows had none of that - just Ron, Harry, and Hermione moping around in a forest taking turns acting out of character and all wangsty because of the horcrux.
I've seen a YT video that explains how having particular directors makes all the difference in how the setting is perceived. In
Prisoner of Azkaban, we're not just shown the interior of Hagrid's hut, we're shown where it is in relation to the castle and the Forbidden Forest/Shrieking Shack, and it makes Hogwarts seem like a
place, not just a collection of interior sets. That was also the first movie to be darker in tone (according to the YT video, though I'd consider mind control of a child and petrification of various people - and a cat - to be dark).
If I am remembering the book right, Nevile would have been an excellent focus in the novel as he was actually running around fighting the wizard nazis instead of moping in a forest.
Yes, they should have done more with Neville, given that he could just as easily been the focus of the prophecy as Harry. Both boys had tragic things happen to their parents, but at least Neville wasn't abused as a child, as Harry was.
I've picked up this excellent so far book about the evils of my ancestors and why white people should not be allowed to even write books anymore. Bit eye opening
What book is that?
Anything like the opinion offered by some FN person on CBC that non-indigenous people should not be allowed to even speak indigenous words or names (and would therefore have to rename half the place-names in Canada and find different words for some common Canadian objects)?
Funny how racism and cultural appropriation appears to only work in one direction and the other direction won't acknowledge their hypocrisy (there's an article on CBC showing how some native artists have appropriated baby Yoda for their handicraft industry; I wonder if they bothered to ask permission of Disney and the other copyright holders?).