Thanks to Covid19 I've gotten a lot of reading done.
Finished up The Saxon Shore and The Fort at Rivers Bend by Jack Whyte, part of his historical fantasy/fiction Camulod series. I'd rate the stories a 2/5. They aren't bad, but the connection to either history or the Arthurian myths are pretty poor*. The writing is nothing to write home about, the sex scenes are atrocious**, and the author takes forever to get anywhere. He creates conflicts, has characters agonize over them, and then get resolved with no consequence. I'm probably about 3,000 pages in and King Arthur has finally reached manhood.
Despite my complaints, the author does a passable job in making characters have non-modern concerns and ways of understanding things. Some of the characters, notably Lucanus the Physician started to grow on me over the books.
*Stirrups are introduced in ~430AD, he includes the visit of Germanus of Auxerre to Britain, but neglects to include the famous story of Germanus leading the Britons in a great victory over Picts and Saxons. There are a whole bunch of other things that, even based on out limited knowledge of the 'Arthurian' period, indicates the author wasn't too bothered about accuracy.
*After reading about the fluids he described in one of them, I felt the last shreds of my heterosexuality slip away.
In light on the above books, I reread the majority of Guy Halsall's Worlds of Arthur to remind myself of how much space there is to work and create awesome historical fiction in an 'Arthurian' Britain that is not inaccurate. The book is highly recommended, as are all of Halsall's books.
Looking for fiction that moves faster than Jack Whyte, I started on a Best of compilation of Robert Howard's short stories.