Which Civ's First Look Video Will We Get next?

[zwei833]

You still believe in patterns

Yes I am.

 

[hugojackson18]

No video today... =( Makes me sad

 

[6uho Koe]

Unless they pull the same thing like last week, they could show a new video next Tuesday, which could be a German civ in preparation or honor of the gamescom event, which is next Thursday, I believe.

 

[zwei833]

Unless they pull the same thing like last week, they could show a new video next Tuesday, which could be a German civ in preparation or honor of the gamescom event, which is next Thursday, I believe.

There was a big press event in USA last month and they didn't release American civ for that.

Edit: What's wrong with my memory? They released the American civ as the first civ they released.

 

[Morningcalm]

Looks like they're only doing 1 video a week now. WHYYYY.....and where is the first look at Civ VI music?

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

If you're feeling down about not getting a First Look today, just remember: for G&K and BNW we only got new info once a month.

 

[Haig]

I think Japan was released on friday?

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

I think Japan was released on friday?

Yes. Because that particular week began with a holiday. Egypt was on a Wednesday instead of a Tuesday that week as well. In America, when we all get drunk on Monday, Tuesday becomes the substitute Monday and the rest of the days follow along accordingly.

 

[jsciv69]

[where is the first look at Civ VI music? [/QUOTE]

This is my question as well. There is a sample of the opening score by Christopher Tin. It is heard during one of the gameplay YouTube videos playing as Japan. I know Tin performed it a couple weeks ago. The full release of that concert is hard to find at this point.

 

[sashibo2]

Ok I have returned with what I've been told is (presumably) the last image my friend was sent.

Looks like Ottomans, though that's probably no surprise since they're always in the game.

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

Ok I have returned with what I've been told is (presumably) the last image my friend was sent.

Looks like Ottomans, though that's probably no surprise since they're always in the game.

This is actually the first contentious one you've posted. If you ever decide to risk your sanity and check out the portrait thread, there are a few portraits that no one can figure out. One of them happens to cover the span of the alphabet including Ottomans. You're going to get heat over this.

 

[sashibo2]

This is actually the first contentious one you've posted. If you ever decide to risk your sanity and check out the portrait thread, there are a few portraits that no one can figure out. One of them happens to cover the span of the alphabet including Ottomans. You're going to get heat over this.

What kind of heat? Do people dislike the Ottomans?

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

What kind of heat? Do people dislike the Ottomans?

There is considerable partisanship over which civ the portrait in question, labeled C5, represents. Basically, everyone who strongly feels that the portrait is something other than an Ottoman leader is going to call it a fake.

 

[sashibo2]

There is considerable partisanship over which civ the portrait in question, labeled C5, represents. Basically, everyone who strongly feels that the portrait is something other than an Ottoman leader is going to call it a fake.

Ok, thanks for clarifying! I didn't realize there was such a hotbed of debate over some of the leaders..

 

[SMcM]

I believe it. Ottomans are C5, I am sure of it. C5 does not look like a Mongol, and Ottomans have been hinted at on Twitter. And no, the Khmer tweet was not the same; the fall of Constantinople is not something you would post without particular reason (they didn't tweet about the end of the second world war, or the fall of the Berlin wall, or the fall of the western Roman empire, or vast list of other history defining events), but underground Khmer cities? Sure! A nice bit of trivia to keep their twitter filled with content, and gives the impression that the Civ team is interested in history, which is definitely something they would want their fans to think. Anyway, the Khmer thing could be a hint at future DLC.

Also, I would hope this community was not a place where someone would continually troll others for fun. I would not think that was too much to hope for.

Now, we still need something to reveal B5. If that is Göktürks, then maybe that would replace Mongolia, and so that would back up C5 being Ottomans, as Mongolia is most popular choice for C5 (even though there is really no evidence to support that, besides Mongolia being in most Civ games).

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

It looks like the Blue Mosque in the picture.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_I#/media/File:Blue_Mosque.jpg

It was built by Ahmed I.

 

[ImperialChaos]

Woah. So C5 is officially Ottomans? Is it a photoshop?

 

[Dray]

It looks like the Blue Mosque in the picture.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_I#/media/File:Blue_Mosque.jpg

It was built by Ahmed I.

So no Mehmed II or Suleiman I? Hmm..

 

[Siptah]

the picture shows the (byzantine) hagia sophia (color of the blue mosque is different). and as posted in the other thread it should say "ottoman" and not "ottomans". Makes not too much sense. But i might be wrong.

 

[Eagle Pursuit]

So no Mehmed II? Hmm..

If Firaxis does there homework, it should be a sultan from the 1600s or later.