Synobun
Deity
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2006
- Messages
- 24,884
Why is PDP not comparable to south park?
Because they like South Park but don't like Felix.
No because South Park, while crass and controversial, has taken years to develop characters, build context and deliver satire. Felix does not. He has zero comedic skill, nor editorial oversight, in writing and delivering a joke where there is no punchline.Why is PDP not comparable to south park?
No because South Park, while crass and controversial, has taken years to develop characters, build context and deliver satire. Felix does not. He has zero comedic skill, nor editorial oversight, in writing and delivering a joke where there is no punchline.
But his character did not even deliver the message. He took advantage of two guys who didn't understand the message of hate he delivered. That's the final transgression of many that are not funny in any way. There is no supporting comedic structure to his nine attempts at making this funny.You just described Felix, though. He's spent years developing his character and context.
Which is why his fans can so readily tell outsiders that they're clueless. South Park seems offensively crass and disrespectful to an outsider as well.
However, considering the teenage white male demographic that follow him I shouldn't be surprised they defend him.
But his character did not even deliver the message. He took advantage of two guys who didn't understand the message of hate he delivered. That's the final transgression of many that are not funny in any way. There is no supporting comedic structure to his nine attempts at making this funny.
However, considering the teenage white male demographic that follow him I shouldn't be surprised they defend him.
Hard to be racist when I happen to be white and male. Against teenagers? Maybe. I have two of them and they should be challenged on their views as I was when I was their age.That's pretty racist. Is that the only sort of rhetoric you have available for your arguments?
the message of hate he delivered.
Hard to be racist when I happen to be white and male.
Daily Stormer has Pewdiepie as their #1 fan site. This argument runs along generational lines in my house as the 14 and 16 year old feel we don't understand the context of his (alleged) joke. I don't understand is the volume of times (9?) that he's made these videos and they find it ok. Also, the argument comparing his videos to South Park is crap and not even close.
He wasn't delivering a message of hate, he was demonstrating that people will do anything for money. That was the context of the joke. So when you have 14 and 16 year olds saying you don't get the context, making comments like this lead me to believe they are correct.
It can only be one or the otherHe wasn't delivering a message of hate, he was demonstrating that people will do anything for money.
This just in: Property theft and threat of physical harm is comparable to saying bad words.
I'm not familiar with PewDiePie at all, but I'm curious about whether you're arguing that WSJ just didn't get his joke, and jumped the gun to condemn him b/c of political correctness (or whatever)... or if WSJ got his joke just fine but wanted to destroy him and disingenuously used this as an excuse? Or maybe some at WSJ were doing the latter and tricked others into doing the former? Or maybe some at WSJ were doing the former and the higher-ups took advantage of their mistake to do the former?He wasn't delivering a message of hate, he was demonstrating that people will do anything for money. That was the context of the joke.