Will technology accomplish what the GOP could not?


Link to video.

Omerta is back! Insurance companies better not talk, or else ...


It's not exactly coming out of left field either. We've seen it before elsewhere:
http://cpj.org/reports/2013/10/obama-and-the-press-us-leaks-surveillance-post-911.php

“I think we have a real problem,” said New York Times national security reporter Scott Shane. “Most people are deterred by those leaks prosecutions. They’re scared to death. There’s a gray zone between classified and unclassified information, and most sources were in that gray zone. Sources are now afraid to enter that gray zone. It’s having a deterrent effect. If we consider aggressive press coverage of government activities being at the core of American democracy, this tips the balance heavily in favor of the government.”

At the same time, the journalists told me, designated administration spokesmen are often unresponsive or hostile to press inquiries, even when reporters have been sent to them by officials who won’t talk on their own. Despite President Barack Obama’s repeated promise that his administration would be the most open and transparent in American history, reporters and government transparency advocates said they are disappointed by its performance in improving access to the information they need.

“This is the most closed, control freak administration I’ve ever covered,” said David E. Sanger, veteran chief Washington correspondent of The New York Times.


We can expect even more of this kind of thing if we elect Hillary in 2016.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-ferguson/hillary-clinton-documentary_b_4014792.html

In late 2012, CNN Films approached me about directing a documentary. We discussed a number of potential subjects, and eventually settled on Hillary Rodham Clinton. The film would be ambitious, controversial, and highly visible. But I felt that it was important, that I was qualified to do it, and that I could be fair. CNN gave me complete control ("final cut") over the theatrical version, and a generous budget.

And then the fun began. The day after the contract was signed, I received a message from Nick Merrill, Hillary Clinton's press secretary. He already knew about the film, and clearly had a source within CNN. He interrogated me; at first I answered, but eventually I stopped. When I requested an off-the-record, private conversation with Mrs. Clinton, Merrill replied that she was busy writing her book, and not speaking to the media.

Next came Phillipe Reines, Hillary Clinton's media fixer, who contacted various people at CNN, interrogated them, and expressed concern about alleged conflicts of interest generated because my film was a for-profit endeavor (as nearly all documentaries and news organizations are). When I contacted him, he declined to speak with me. He then repeated his allegations to Politico, which published them...


...I would have loved to explore all this. But when I approached people for interviews, I discovered that nobody, and I mean nobody, was interested in helping me make this film. Not Democrats, not Republicans -- and certainly nobody who works with the Clintons, wants access to the Clintons, or dreams of a position in a Hillary Clinton administration. Not even journalists who want access, which can easily be taken away. I even sensed potential difficulty in licensing archival footage from CBN (Pat Robertson) and from Fox. After approaching well over a hundred people, only two persons who had ever dealt with Mrs. Clinton would agree to an on-camera interview, and I suspected that even they would back out.

This, of course, was the real consequence, and probably the real intent, of the announcements by the RNC, Philippe Reines, and David Brock. Neither political party wanted the film made. After painful reflection, I decided that I couldn't make a film of which I would be proud. And so I'm cancelling. (Not because of any pressure from CNN -- quite the contrary.) It's a victory for the Clintons, and for the money machines that both political parties have now become. But I don't think that it's a victory for the media, or for the American people. I still believe that Mrs. Clinton has many virtues including great intelligence, fortitude, and a deep commitment to bettering the lives of women and children worldwide. But this is not her finest hour.
 
Does it also "amuse" you to be supporting a clearly broken "industry" which is even worse than what you could have for half the cost?
 
I'm just amused by that fact that so far more people have lost their insurance due to Obamacare than have actully signed up for Obamacare at the moment.

"Lost their insurance" is a completely unsupportable claim.
 
Some of them are I think. It is fairly typical in the individual market for a company to cancel the existing policy and offer a new one at renewal. This happens on a regualr basis, not just this year.
 
Why'd their insurance companies not offer compliant plans?
Because the people didn't think they needed maternity coverage (if male) or coverage for drug abuse treatment (if they didn't use drugs). Who really cares? They seemed to like the plan and the President told them repeatedly that they could keep it if they wanted.
 
Some of them are I think. It is fairly typical in the individual market for a company to cancel the existing policy and offer a new one at renewal. This happens on a regular basis, not just this year.
So the President did lie to the American people?
 
Who really cares?
Well, I wanna know if you're complaining about people just being dropped, or if they're whining about being asked to switch to compliant plans that're essentially a bit of red tape.
the President told them repeatedly that they could keep it if they wanted.
Yeah, I'm with you on that one. I'd forgive him if the non-compliant plans were obviously substandard (but the buyers didn't know). Probably, too, if the 'switching' is reasonably painless (i.e., same services, similar prices). I'd object if people were being pressured into upgrading into a gold-plated rent-seeking exercise
 
Well, I wanna know if you're complaining about people just being dropped, or if they're whining about being asked to switch to compliant plans that're essentially a bit of red tape.
I gave you an example of one of the people in question in post 173.
 
So the President did lie to the American people?
If you read the full speech or Q&A from where these "lie" quotes are being dug up, you will see that he is primarily dispelling the myth that Obamacare will be socialized medicine where you are left without choices. His basic point, though imprecisely worded, was that the government is not going to force you to change doctors or insurers.
 
Because the people didn't think they needed maternity coverage (if male) or coverage for drug abuse treatment (if they didn't use drugs). Who really cares? They seemed to like the plan and the President told them repeatedly that they could keep it if they wanted.

There's a way insurance can work, and a way it can't. Men should pay an equal amount for pregnancy and birth control cost mitigation as women, just as women should pay an equal amount for covering prostate cancer and heart disease.
 
If you read the full speech or Q&A from where these "lie" quotes are being dug up, you will see that he is primarily dispelling the myth that Obamacare will be socialized medicine where you are left without choices. His basic point, though imprecisely worded, was that the government is not going to force you to change doctors or insurers.
His words, verbatim:

So let me begin by saying this: I know that there are millions of Americans who are content with their health care coverage – they like their plan and they value their relationship with their doctor. And that means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor. Period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan. Period. No one will take it away. No matter what.

Shockingly, this seems to have been a bald faced lie to the American people and its enjoyable watching people such as yourself try to spin it as anything other than that.
 
Back
Top Bottom