Actually I think some of us appreciate that. (I know I do). It saves me searching elsewhere to see what they're saying. It's really quite simple to know the bias of the post based on the avatar. Be honest, you'd be somewhat bored without it.
You're right. It has been changed. For the record, that was copied and pasted from Politico's website.I went to Politico and the headline was only the second part of what you quote.
You're right. It has been changed. For the record, that was copied and pasted from Politico's website.
J
You still have not answered the question posed. Would another Obama (without the racial issue) be a good thing?Based on your longstanding and demonstrable commitment to the truth, as defined by Donald Trump, there doesn't appear to be anything more to say on this then.
You still have not answered the question posed. Would another Obama (without the racial baggage) be a good thing?
J
On the whole, I don't think Obama's race was "baggage" for him. Part of the excitement he generated in his campaign was precisely the excitement of giving Americans the opportunity to vote for a person of color.
On the whole, I think being a person of color is not "baggage" for a Democratic candidate.
O'Rourke's liability is that of being a recent loser, pace JR.
I fixed that for you. And yes it is a good thing.There's a Politico article out this morning. In this case, the title is the point:
‘He’s Barack Obama, but white’:Beto O’Rourke blows up the 2020 Democratic primary
Is that a good thing?
J
That makes sense because clicked on a link to get to the article.It's why you still have to use the principle of charity, look for ways someone might be correct, rather than incorrect, even when you don't agree with them.
https://www.politico.eu/article/hes...urke-blows-up-the-us-2020-democratic-primary/
The EU version contains the headline that OJH said existed.
That makes sense because clicked on a link to get to the article.
To those that object to the term baggage, read it as shorthand for racially charged distraction. It was not intended to imply a hindrance but I did not have another term that suited. I'll just change it to say issue.
J
Perhaps it's because i'm a limey, but it strikes me as weird that the article tells me precisely nothing about why people are interested in him apart from the fact that he raised a lot of money. What is his policy platform? What is his voting record like?
He's a good orator.Perhaps it's because i'm a limey, but it strikes me as weird that the article tells me precisely nothing about why people are interested in him apart from the fact that he raised a lot of money. What is his policy platform? What is his voting record like?