So, we need newborn children to run for office?
Everybody has the same past?
You're not going to find many people who were in federal elected office in the U.S. in the 1990s who didn't vote in favor of at least some of the awful "tough on crime" legislation.
Yep. There's no one who lived through the nineties in an alternate reality. Except maybe
@onejayhawk. He's clearly in one now, so he could have been in one then I suppose.
My - hardly veiled - contention is that while what you assereted may be literally and technically true, surely there must be differences.
So we'll pick ourselves some totally random Democrat. I'll draw a name out of a... oh it's Senator Sanders! Isn't that weird?
(You surely know everything i am about to tell you. Just as a precaution i'd like to refresh your memory.)
So in the primary last presidential election's primary campaign it was noted in passing what stark contrast there is how Sanders and his primary opponent spent the '60s, particularly with regards to civil rights. I believe photos of Senator Sanders being arrested by the Chicago PD in the wake of civil rights protestest regarding segregated housing at the University of Chicago featured.
In some moment where there was no empty podium to cover the very serious and self-important people at CNN bothered to ask him about it:
And he's passing the ball back to Mr. Vanderbilt so softly that it's cringeworthy.
I literally flinched.
Schoolyard imagery?!
The photographs you have seen are from a time when Mr. Sanders was already, well, orphaned, basically. His mother, one Dorothy Glassberg, died before his 21st birthday.
His father had died a few years ealier. He was a first generation immigrant: Elias Ben Yehuda Sanders.
From Western Galicia.
Needless to say the young Mr. Sanders ranked in the bottom percentiles as far the availability of extended family is concerned...
So the first thing that got into his mind was to get his hindparts arrested for protesting housing segregation at the University of Chicago.
Because he "doesn't like bullies".
Anyway, having established that, let's look how Rep. Sanders did, shall we?
Of course there are more pieces to The New Jim Crow, but since we were talking about the '90s there are chiefly three acts of Congress we are interested in.
1. There's
S.735 - Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
Unfortunatly i don't have a clip for that, but needless to say Rep. Sanders was among the odd 133 nay votes on the bill. I'm sure you're familiar with his comments on capital punnishment.
The state shouldn't kill people... and all that. We'll file it next to he doesn't like bullies, if that's allright with you.
Iirc this is the act where the term "superpredator" was primarilly relevant, btw.
2. Then there's
HR 3371 - Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1991.
Here we can check the man's actual words:
The bill passed 305 to 118.
Among the 305 are 211 Democrats, among others Rep. Wyden and Rep. Schumer.
3. And then there's the crown jewel of the New Jim Crow:
HR. 3355 - The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994
A grandios bill that did about 27 things (some of which you probably like). It is the crowning achivement of authoritarianism and bigotry in that age of American politics. It is evil enough to be named in one breath with hte great racist Acts of Congressional history.
Here we have Rep. Sanders' comments:
That's more guarded language as you may notice.
The bill passed 235 to 195. Among the Ayes are 188 Democrats 46 Republicans and one Independent.
Now you may wonder what on earth possessed Representative Sanders to vote for this most hideous of bills.
And i'm going to tell you and you're not going to like it:
Of course the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 was written in the first place by
that other guy.
Point being:
Certainly there are degrees here?