Oh, it's just a huge number of extremely minuscule changes that are supposed to drive you crazy. Already seen the Malta-Crete swap? Catalonia in Basque? That Ireland moved north to be besides Scotland? That Strasbourg is right, but on the other side of the Rhine? That we have Leningrad AND St. Petersburgh? And whatever Lithuania did? That Geneva and Genoa switched places?
It's great because as it is stated on the bottom right: Boundary representation is not necessarily authoritative. It's just a silly thing, a map to explore and find all the mistakes.
I saw on the news that Iran has denied attacking an Omani tanker, but what stood out to me is the foreign affairs minister's backdrop, a section of which I captured for us to enjoy.
I saw on the news that Iran has denied attacking an Omani tanker, but what stood out to me is the foreign affairs minister's backdrop, a section of which I captured for us to enjoy.
I saw on the news that Iran has denied attacking an Omani tanker, but what stood out to me is the foreign affairs minister's backdrop, a section of which I captured for us to enjoy.
nicely claiming the Gulf -and- the entrance to the Red Sea . The tanker attack should start an all out war , so much that to spite the possibility Washington has moved its "local" arrier to the China sea or whatever .
I don’t think we can say for certain that it was a deliberate choice—with the map’s poor quality of assembly, I think it’s as equally likely they glued Iran on the wrong spot, had to pry it off, and then they didn’t bother to scrape off the leftover glue; notice how the shape of the discoloration is the same as Iran itself.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.