Or you do what was done historically, and claim a ton of land whether you can inhabit it or not.
Because it was quicker.Why straight borders, why?
Not only a few individuals but the whole country. Imagine a modern, fully industrialized Japan (125m citizens) next to vast lands with largely intact infrastructure, ripe for taking. But you got a point with north and south Cyprus, Jamaica etcIf they are only island survivors, I doubt there would be that many of them to constitute such large amounts of land. 28 years later, at most, you would see city-states, maybe a small empire or two, but nothing on the scale you have going.
I was a bit inspired by the movie 28 days later .Or you do what was done historically, and claim a ton of land whether you can inhabit it or not.
Not only a few individuals but the whole country. Imagine a modern, fully industrialized Japan (125m citizens) next to vast lands with largely intact infrastructure, ripe for taking. But you got a point with north and south Cyprus, Jamaica etc. Also, Indonesia should have a bit more considering they're 200+ million crammed up within their current borders.
Nice, are the borders really that clean, or is there a province or two not exactly where it should belong... ?
I was being sarcastic, I would go, I would go anywhere of course. I'm from Bosnia, you get why.
If the USSR got curbstomped that badly, how did they get Eastern Poland and Finland?
Would dirty porn involving blond mistress Nazi chicks satisfy you?