Alternate History Thread IV: The Sequel

Olympias vacated Makedonia by sea

Butterfly effect, I presume; good thing too, I always liked Olympias. A shame she still died and failed, though, but this still was better than in OTL.

All that was needed for a third war to be set off was a single spark…a spark which would come from a most unexpected direction…

...the west.

to what degree the Eumenid territories are Sinified.

:eek:

Oh no. alex994 got him.

(Though not the ksatriyas, since they lose caste status if they leave India.)

The thing about caste system in ancient India, at least in times of turmoil, is that might makes divine right. ;) That said, yes, it might hinder most of them.

IMHO the most interesting outcome - though it might still be negated - is the detachment of Mesopotamia from Iran, which also means that Iran exists as an independent political unit as opposed to being more or less tacked on to holdings further west. If maintained, this situation will bode well for the cities of Elymais and Persis. Ofcourse, I think that the Eumenid Empire is also the most fragile, what with all those subdivisions and the satraps there; it also seems like a natural set up for a (Persian) variation of feudalism, unless central power is properly asserted. It might not fall apart, but this will be cause for difficulties in the future. Culturally, there are many different ways this could go. I think that an independent Mesopotamia would be (even) more Hellenised than in OTL, but Persia might end up Hellenistic, Zoroastrian (which would, on one hand, be the imitation of the Ptolemies inasmuch as it allows to blend in better, and, on the other hand, the imitation of the Sassanids if combined with religious reforms, because a centralised Zoroastrian cult is the best possible ideological weapon one could hope to have against various regionalistic tendencies and powers) or even Buddhist (bonus points if greater contacts are established with China early on - pretty much a given - and it ends up being Taoist or worse :lol: ). I'm serious about the Zoroastrian option, though; in the long-term it might very well happen, and you did mention the whole wearing eastern clothes thing, as well as the extant ties with the Persian aristocracy. And the Hellenistic roots will weaken over time; Persia is relatively detached from the main cultural and commercial ties of the Eastern Mediterranean/Western and Central Near Eastern region. The Eumenid Empire, just like Baktria in OTL, will inevitably be more drawn to the east, but Zoroastrianism, if properly interpreted, is a superior (from the royal point of view) alternative to Buddhism.

Eumenid Shah-en-Shahs and Hellenistic Zoroastrianism FTW.
 
I basically have almost no idea what happened in the alt-hist aside from a lot of battles involving Alexander's old generals and their offspring and Alexander's mother dying, but I like anything which involves stuff becoming Sinified :p
 
Butterfly effect, I presume; good thing too, I always liked Olympias. A shame she still died and failed, though, but this still was better than in OTL.
Only kind of a butterfly, but yeah.
das said:
...the west.
I said unexpected. :p
das said:
Ofcourse, I think that the Eumenid Empire is also the most fragile, what with all those subdivisions and the satraps there; it also seems like a natural set up for a (Persian) variation of feudalism, unless central power is properly asserted.
That was the nice thing about the war; Eumenes was able to replace a lot of the Upper Satraps with his own creatures. You may have noted the Hieronymos easter egg (the historian makes history! woohoo); he and Kelbanos are basically welded to Eumenes for whatever reason, and Antigenes to a lesser degree. In OTL, Antigonos despised Antigenes such that he had him burned alive after Gabiene...but yeah, anyway, these doods is loyal to Eumenes and might perhaps facilitate some centralization measures on his part. :p

Also, I would contend that the Persian variation of feudalism was tied in large part to the necessity of raising large numbers of heavy horsemen rapidly (there's a rather interesting thread on the Total War Center that started out as a discussion of the possibility of Caesar conquering the Pahlavan but which turned into a sort of history article on the Iranian system of war at the time...good stuff, I can link you to it if you're interested). Eumenes is absent this necessity and mechanism, and he is also absent loads of satraps. Epic wins?
das said:
I'm serious about the Zoroastrian option, though; in the long-term it might very well happen, and you did mention the whole wearing eastern clothes thing, as well as the extant ties with the Persian aristocracy.
I always did like the Baktrian cult of Zeus-Ahura-Mazda. :p Actually, for what you're talking about, Baktria might be an excellent OTL parallel.
das said:
Eumenid Shah-en-Shahs and Hellenistic Zoroastrianism FTW.
:lol:

EDIT: alex, it's more like the Chinese became Hellenized. Antigonos Monophthalmos took over the Tarim Basin and is making war on the Warring States, and Chandragupta Maurya, the vassal of Eumenes of Kardia, is aiding the invasion from the south. :p
 
EDIT: alex, it's more like the Chinese became Hellenized. Antigonos Monophthalmos took over the Tarim Basin and is making war on the Warring States, and Chandragupta Maurya, the vassal of Eumenes of Kardia, is aiding the invasion from the south. :p

And the she-wolf eats Romulus and Remus :p
 
And the she-wolf eats Romulus and Remus :p
Sure, why not?...oh, wait, you're two centuries too late. I find you guilty of historical failure and sentence you to a semester of taking nothing but courses on classical Mediterranean history.
 
I said unexpected. :p

Err... the north-east? Center-north? Center-south? Everything else is more or less to be expected, isn't it?

That was the nice thing about the war; Eumenes was able to replace a lot of the Upper Satraps with his own creatures. You may have noted the Hieronymos easter egg (the historian makes history! woohoo); he and Kelbanos are basically welded to Eumenes for whatever reason, and Antigenes to a lesser degree. In OTL, Antigonos despised Antigenes such that he had him burned alive after Gabiene...but yeah, anyway, these doods is loyal to Eumenes and might perhaps facilitate some centralization measures on his part. :p

Also, I would contend that the Persian variation of feudalism was tied in large part to the necessity of raising large numbers of heavy horsemen rapidly (there's a rather interesting thread on the Total War Center that started out as a discussion of the possibility of Caesar conquering the Pahlavan but which turned into a sort of history article on the Iranian system of war at the time...good stuff, I can link you to it if you're interested). Eumenes is absent this necessity and mechanism, and he is also absent loads of satraps. Epic wins?

Obviously Eumenes, like any good founder of an oriental empire, would not have any such problems. The Eumenids, though... Obviously this is long-term stuff, but a Hellenistic Persia might end up going feudal faster than in OTL after the first and finest three generations pass away. On the other hand, it depends on the social policy and on the eventual appearance of the Silk Route, which could only be helped by a stable Hellenistic Persia.

It might not work out that way, but I am somewhat looking forward to an Eumenid Persian Renaissance, fueled by trade with India and China and culminating in the restoration of the World-Empire of Kurush and of Alexandros. It would be rather fitting.

Actually, for what you're talking about, Baktria might be an excellent OTL parallel.

Like Baktria, but bigger, stronger and less Iranocentric.

The only problem is that all our mental constructions here might be for nothing if Eumenes simply conquers Mesopotamia early on and moves the capital to Babylon, in which case it would be more like the Seleucids under a different name. Then again, althistorical necessity pretty much demands that this be avoided. ;)
 
I signally failed to notice this thread had had posts in it. Ooops.
Err... the north-east? Center-north? Center-south? Everything else is more or less to be expected, isn't it?
:evil:
das said:
Obviously this is long-term stuff, but a Hellenistic Persia might end up going feudal faster than in OTL after the first and finest three generations pass away. On the other hand, it depends on the social policy and on the eventual appearance of the Silk Route, which could only be helped by a stable Hellenistic Persia.
It does. Figuring out how the klerouchoi/katoikiai and the eventual emergence of kataphraktoi will mesh with each other is actually proving to be somewhat fun, too (in a social way, anyway; militarily, it's already been done for me by that dude Antiochos Megas).
das said:
It might not work out that way, but I am somewhat looking forward to an Eumenid Persian Renaissance, fueled by trade with India and China and culminating in the restoration of the World-Empire of Kurush and of Alexandros. It would be rather fitting.
It would also generate lulz. :p As for the world empire and renascentia, well, you'll just have to wait and see.
das said:
The only problem is that all our mental constructions here might be for nothing if Eumenes simply conquers Mesopotamia early on and moves the capital to Babylon, in which case it would be more like the Seleucids under a different name. Then again, althistorical necessity pretty much demands that this be avoided. ;)
Yeah, grabbing Mesopotamia would make life hella boring. Not having Charax will be commercially detrimental, though. I suppose it wouldn't be too horribly ahistorical to revive Persian control over, say, Maketa, to help combat the effect of losing the Gulf trade.
 
@Dachs your althistory is blasphemy. Everyone knows the Mauryans wiped the floor with the Selecuids and Chandragupta Maurya beat Selecus in combat personally beating him senseless with a mace. Blasphemy I say.

But on another note a Mauryan Empire without Gandhara and the Indus would probably be more stable and longer lasting in the long run. Gandhara had three revolts during the regin of Asoka and after his death it pretty much broke away as did the other parts of the empire like the Satavanah's, Kalinga, and the Western Kasatrapas. The Mauryan's expended tremendous resources trying to hold all the territory they won. Without it they could likely develop a stabler more long lasting empire which would have an interesting effect on Indian history. They could also focus more on expansion in the subcontinent and bring the south fully into the fold taking over the Pandya's, Chera's, Chola's and all the other people that lived down there.

Perhaps this would create a greater sense of a unified India especially if they managed to effectively institute their bureaucracy and develop their infrastructure across the empire. And presumably if your Eumenids or whoever remains stable they would be insulated from barbarian invasion.
 
I'm not sure if there is much of a point to expanding southwards at this point; as far as I can understand southern India wasn't much of a big prize until the middle of the 2nd century BC or so, at which point maritime trade in the region picked up. Still, a less overstretched Mauryan Empire would still be nice.
 
I'm not sure if there is much of a point to expanding southwards at this point; as far as I can understand southern India wasn't much of a big prize until the middle of the 2nd century BC or so, at which point maritime trade in the region picked up. Still, a less overstretched Mauryan Empire would still be nice.

Well all the other avenues of expansion would be closed to them. Can't go west without going to war with Dach's state, can't go north or east either. So they may as well head south all that's down there is a collection of minor kingdoms at this point and it'll be easy enough. Hm...if Chandragupta Maurya crushes Kalinga during his rule itself, it may spare Asoka from being a humanitarian so Asoka could retain his warlike and aggressive ways. That would be cool.
 
The thing is, the south still is far away, difficult to hold on to and generally not worth the bother at the time. Kalinga is just about the only good target there. Awesome though a warmongering Asoka would have been, the Mauryan Empire had already expanded almost as far as it can viably hold together by then. I suspect that if anything he might want to go for a rematch with the Eumenids in this world.
 
I think that there is only one appropriate response to all of this: :mischief:

Hopefully I should have something to post before I go to the CFC meetup in DC; be forewarned, this is going to be a lot longer than the last installment. :)
 
Rampant.

“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.”
-Revelation vi, 7

Beyond the Caucasus, the vast and trackless steppes stretch onward to infinity. Few Greeks travel these lands, inhabited as they are by fierce nomads, the Skythoi, whom not even Darayavahus Wuzurg had succeeded in conquering. Their horse archers are nigh invulnerable, attacking from range and retreating with speed. These Skythoi have no single base, no real lasting encampments of any kind, and thus they can evade any attackers with impunity. But not all Skythoi are alike. North of Sogdiane and Baktria, there live the Saka, armored horsemen with a barbaric tongue, and the Massagetai, who had killed Kurush centuries ago. The Skythoi to the north of the Caucasus are different. They are called the Saurometai, only recently become lords of that steppe, rulers of a confederation that includes the Roxolani, the Aorsi, the Iazygai, and Thyssagetai, and headed by the Saitai. They are equally at home fighting on horseback or on foot; their cavalry, comprised of a group of noble lancers backed by a formidable array of horse archers, is the primary arm but the foot-archers, the fistaeg fat aexsdzytae, were skilled as well. They are pastoral herders, but they take a great interest in the wealth that crosses their lands, and they profit from the trade that runs through their territories.

It is through that trade that they are connected to the events on the other side of the Caucasus, to the Hai of the mountains. Their lands were disturbed by the passage of fleeing Haikaikan refugees, seeking asylum from the armies of Demetrios Poliorketes. They already knew of the riches of the southern lands, of the Black Sea coast where Eumelos was king over the Bosporos of the Kimmerioi. Similar wealth was to be had in Hayasdan, wealth that had until now been out of reach of the Sauromatai horse-lords. But now the Caucasus passes were poorly fortified. Egrisi and Aghvan lay open to invasion, and the Hellenic armies which had established suzerainty were now withdrawing, leaving behind garrisons insufficient to hold the land. The Khayasha of the Saurometai, Zanticos, spied an opportunity. The puppet Arkah that Demetrios had set over Hayasdan, a Hellene/Haikaikan half-breed albino named Adaskos, was unpopular and intentionally weak, made so by his overlords so as to make Hayasdan simpler to pacify in the event of disloyalty. The same weakness that Demetrios and his father intended to use against a Hai revolt would serve to facilitate the passage of the Saurometai into the rich lands of the south, and finally claim their birthright as warriors. Contrary to popular belief, these plans were already afoot when the dark-skinned men from the south offered great riches to the Khayasha in exchange for such an attack; this offer merely spurred Zanticos’ preparations for war.

After the passes cleared in the spring of 309, the Saurometai force, with the prince Abeakos at its head and ten thousand horse in its train, irrupted through the Souanian Gates with scarcely any resistance at all, debouching into Kartli, which was overrun easily before advancing into Hayasdan itself. By espousing the cause of Yervand Yervanduni, Avag Sepuh of Hayasdan and dispossessed heir of Orontes II, the Saurometai gained much popular support. Due to the popular support for the invasion, Yervand was able to recruit nakhararakan horsemen, what the Hellenes would call kataphraktoi, and add them to his personal khuveshagan. The popular revolt swelled, and the Antigonid garrisons of Kotais and Mtskheta were thrown out. By the summer of 309, Hayasdan was totally secure under the Saurometai and the growing forces of Yervand, who declared himself the rightful Arkah and crowned himself as such at Armavir.

This news was not well received in Kelenai, and Antigonos ordered Polemaios into the mountains to restore the situation and retake Ani as a base for further operations in Hayasdan. He didn’t send Demetrios, the better general, because of an intuition that this was only the beginning of his troubles. He was right: the Third War was on. Taking advantage of the Antigonid distraction in Hayasdan, Ptolemaios had declared war, and a Ptolemaic field army was already en route to Damaskos in Syria-Koile. Ptolemaios’ unexpected ally, Seleukos, joined the fray as well, leading thirty thousand men into Assyria and Adiabene. Other plots by Ptolemaios’ coalition commenced as well; Alexandros, Regent of Makedonia, seized the opportunity to dispatch an army into Epeiros that, with popular support, unseated Alketas II and replaced him on the Molossian throne with the ten year old Pyrrhos, whom Alexandros expected to act as his puppet. Antigonos’ empire was assailed on the seas as well, as Ptolemaios dispatched a fleet under Kleitos the White to seize Kypros as a base for attacking Antigonos in Syria.

The Monophthalmos would have been a fool not to prepare for a war, and indeed his own schemes were going into motion as well. Lysimachos, basileus in Thraikia, came down on the Antigonid side and led an army into Makedonia to unseat Alexandros and the puppet Herakles. Demetrios took command of the army en route to repel the Syrian invasion, and one Astyochos was ordered into Adiabene. Antigonos himself stayed in Anatolia to coordinate all of the actions and administer the calling up of klerouchoi phalangitai; when he had managed to raise a grand army, probably by the spring of next year, he himself would lead it to attack the target of his choice, as he was the only one qualified to do so, being the basileus and all. Thus was the grand strategy of the Antigonoi; for the year of 309 it seemed to cover all the bases successfully. In Makedonia, Lysimachos pushed towards the Strymon, where he engaged an army of equivalent size under the command of one Pefkolaos, who had been ordered by Alexandros to hold the line while Epeiros was made safe under Pyrrhos, its restored child-king. Between Pefkolaos and Lysimachos a war of maneuver ensued for a few months, but eventually Pefkolaos stood and fought, under the slopes of the Pangaion Hills at Pergamos. There, Lysimachos’ excellent rhomphaiaphoroi, Thraikian soldiers skilled with the falx, or rhomphaia, carved through the enemy ranks where the ground was rough, but elsewhere on the battlefield, Lysimachos’ phalanx, made up of Thraikian pantodapoi and doryphoroi, lighter-armed units that were not skilled with the sarissa, were beaten badly by the Makedonian regulars. After a day of mutual slaughter, Pefkolaos, who had come off somewhat the worse, retreated behind the Strymon, while Lysimachos laid siege to Amphipolis, and seized it, going into winter quarters there. Eion, at the mouth of the river, remained in Pefkolaos’ hands, though, and would be a thorn that needed to be removed the next year. In Hayasdan, Polemaios seized Ani, beating off an attempt at relief by Zanticos. He then camped at Arshamashat for the winter, while the Saurometai and their Hai “allies” eradicated the last adherents of Adaskos, who had gathered at Phraaspa in Adurbagadan. Demetrios had success against the Ptolemaioi, defeating the covering force for Ptolemaios’ siege of Damaskos on the Upper Orontes, though failing to break the siege itself as yet. Only in Adiabene were Antigonid arms unsuccessful: Astyochos, debouching from the Maseios Mountains, was caught by the adept Seleukos himself in the crossing of the Zabatos, not far from Gaugamela. At the Zabatos River, the advance force of some 7,000 men that had been sent to cover the crossing of the remainder of the army was annihilated by Seleukos’ rapid attack, in which his own klerouchoi phalangitai served well against the deuteroi levy pikemen under Astyochos’ control. Most of the 7,000 perished, driven into the river, and the remainder were taken captive by Seleukos and hired into his own army. Such a debilitating loss prevented Astyochos from relieving Arbela that year, and he retired into the Maseios again while Seleukos successfully assaulted Arbela in the waning months.

Faced with failure on most fronts, Ptolemaios decided to play his ace in the hole starting in 308. Thus far, Antigonos had not been threatened in Anatolia itself. It was high time this happened, but allied naval resources (or lack thereof) had prevented much of anything from being done about it. Still, even the grand armada that Demetrios had led at Skyros and Paphos could not patrol the entire coastline of Asia Mikra, and the signal was given for an uprising to start (along with a tremendous amount of cash, naturally, and other, more nebulous promises). Antigonos’ departure from Asia Mikra the next spring was, to his dismay, suddenly aborted with the revolt of the city of Pergamon, under the faithless satrap of Mysia, Philetairos the eunuch. Pergamon, as the site of one of Antigonos’ treasuries (as well as a silver mine nearby), allowed Philetairos to finance a mercenary army, bolstered by his own satrapal troops. Western Asia Mikra was now under serious threat, and any plan of a renewed campaign in Mesopotamia or elsewhere would have to be shelved. Antigonos turned his army westwards to confront the perfidious Mysians, and ordered Demetrios to do his best to fight both Seleukos and Ptolemaios at the same time, withdrawing troops from the Hayasdan campaign as well. The Antigonoi in 308 and for the foreseeable future would have to operate on a shoestring at best.

This problem was compounded by the surprise victory of the navy of Kleitos the White over the Antigonid fleet, made while the Antigonid admiral, Isidoros Oresteus, had the ships staying at anchor in the cove of Leuke Akte. Following that success up, Kleitos landed a Ptolemaic expeditionary force on Kypros, using connections with the local island kings that allowed the Antigonid garrison to be overrun. The renewal of allied naval supremacy, even if transient, would allow them to support Philetairos better and prolong the Mysian revolt. For a further distraction, Kleitos also made plans to embark a small army under the command of one Pagkrates Lissaios to cause further distraction to Antigonos in Lykia and Pamphylia. That army, made up of most of the Kypros force as well as further reinforcements from Alexandria, would not be ready for battle until next year, but already the expedition’s viability was being confirmed. Demetrios, confident in the dilatory siege techniques of the Ptolemaioi at Damaskos, departed for Assyria with most of his army, absorbing the remainder of Astyochos’ troops along the way. While there was no longer a question of being able to recapture Adiabene, Orrhoa in Assyria could still be made safe. Seleukos was marching past Nisibis already; if he crossed the Euphrates life would become very interesting for Demetrios indeed. The Antigonoi crossed the river and, following a series of maneuvers around Orrhoa, Seleukos and Demetrios fought at Harran. The Breaker of Cities, despite having many of the elephants that his father had been using ever since the aftermath of Triparadeisos, was stymied by Seleukos, who developed an ingenious tactic of elephant traps using spikes and pits; with one of his main advantages thus neutralized, Demetrios was forced into a slower, more grinding fight that ended with the onset of nightfall. Both sides had taken losses, but Seleukos, with the Ptolemaioi to back him up, could afford them. Demetrios, who was the outnumbered one, could not. The strategic defeat of Harran forced the Antigonoi to abandon their remaining territories beyond the Euphrates and conserve their forces in Syria. Meanwhile, the Hayasdan campaign was not going particularly well; Polemaios was having some difficulty coping with the steppe archers of the Saurometai, even if they were less effective in the Caucasus than they were on the trackless steppe to the north. And he had no real answer to the heavy Haikaikan cavalry, the elite nakhararakan horse that withstood repeated blows and who resisted arrow shot with impunity. After a tactical defeat on the Phasis River, compounded by his new deficiency in troops, Polemaios fell back to Arshamashat, unable to renew the campaign. And in Asia Mikra, Antigonos had mixed success; while breaking up Philetairos’ bum rush on Kelenai at the Battle of the Maiandros (where the hastily-collected would-be grand army stood its ground against a furious series of somewhat uncoordinated attacks), his counterblow, directed at the Mysian-seized cities of coastal Lydia, was a failure, and Sardis remained under rebel control, not to mention all Mysia itself. There were no efforts to cross over into Thraikia by Philetairos, at least not yet.

The area on which Antigonos could most count on for success was Lysimachos, surprisingly enough. Despite being horrendously outnumbered and somewhat overextended, the Thraikian basileus adeptly outmaneuvered Pefkolaos and seized Eion without a fight early in the campaign, then struck out across the Strymon and dismantled his opposite number’s army at the Battle of Berge in Bisaltia. Pefkolaos, fighting in the difficult terrain, failed to decline the engagement and was taken to pieces by the elite rhomphaiaphoroi. Hiring on a significant portion of Pefkolaos’ defeated army, Lysimachos continued beyond the Chalkidike through Mygdonia into Makedonia proper, where Alexandros was returning with the army from Epeiros. With roughly equal numbers, the two forces elected to stare each other down outside of Charakoma, near where they both encamped for the winter, with Lysimachos in possession of the city itself. Further activity on that front during the year was minimal; Alexandros had no success in bribing the Thraikian barbarians or the coastal poleis to rebel, mostly due to the recent and painful lesson they had learned at his very own hands but also because of the small forces Lysimachos’ second in command, Pantauchos, had at his disposal for quelling dissent.

The surprising inactivity of Eumenes, who had significant possible gains for aiding either side, during these years can be explained quickly. Though the increasing tension had necessitated his departure from the Indos valley, the real problem lay in increasing pressure from the north. The Saurometai were not the only group that had decided to launch an opportunistic attack in the recent days, and Eumenes’ satrap in Margiane, Stasandros, was screaming for aid and relief from the attacks of the Massagetai and Saka. Eumenes thus spent much of his time during the opening years of the Third War repelling raids and even, in 308, a full fledged invasion by the Saka under the leadership of the chieftain Oxyboakes. Though the Saka were repulsed in a campaign culminating in the brilliant Battle of Marakanda, whereat the Eumenid forces managed to trap the heavily armored Saka nobleman cavalry against a syntagma following an intricate series of maneuvers, Eumenes was forced to retain significant forces in the north under Stasandros to help at least alleviate the pressure. Such a commitment, as well as the maintenance of the Indos army under the command of Ceteus to prevent a Mauryan revanche, precluded Eumenes’ assumption of the offensive even after he returned to Elymais and his capital at Susa in the early part of the year 307.

Pressure on Antigonos was slightly relieved for the coming year, specifically in Hayasdan. Yervand and his Saurometai allies were already quarreling over the matter of independence, and many of the Saurometai chieftains were already complaining about the foreign adventurism of the out of touch Zanticos. As the allies dealt with their own internal squabbles, Polemaios seized the initiative, trying to break the coalition once and for all. Plunging back into the valleys of Hayasdan proper, the Antigonoi brought the allied forces to battle at Zarehavan in the mid-summer of 307. Polemaios, aided by treachery in the Saurometai, convinced many of the other side to defect, and in the confusion Zanticos was killed; the Hai under Yervand withdrew with the death of the allied leader, and Polemaios held the field. He recruited some of the Saurometai as mercenaries, but the majority, who nominated Zanticos’ son Abeakos to the khayashaship, returned across the Caucasus to home, exhausted of the prolonged foreign expedition. With the new numerical supremacy, Polemaios lost no time in pressing the offensive; Kotais was besieged, and the Saurometai mercenaries began raiding the territory around Armavir.

Antigonos had successes in Asia Mikra as well. Philetairos may have been an able administrator, but his generalship was dwarfed by that of the Monophthalmos. The Antigonoi renewed their attack on rebel Lydia and this time stormed Sardis before the Pergamene army could relieve it, then struck in an unexpected direction – instead of seizing the Aigion ports, Antigonos opted to strike north into Mysia to disrupt Philetairos’ control of his home territory and ravage his home. Thyateira was seized without a fight, and Antigonos made his way down the Makestos unopposed, even demonstrating in front of Pergamon, ravaging the countryside, and then returning south, exhibiting his ability to march at will across Philetairos’ territory. These audacious moves induced the Pergamene satrap to adopt a more defensive posture, hunkering down in Mysia and harassing Thyateira, which was a dagger pointed at the heart of his satrapy. Antigonos naturally used this relative inactivity to make capital on another front; he returned to Lydia and besieged the recently-moved city of Smyrna, capturing it before returning to winter headquarters. His successes were only tarnished by Kleitos the White’s landing in Lykia and Pamphylia, carrying Pagkrates’ army and aiding in the successful siege of Myra. The new Ptolemaic base in southern Asia Mikra would have to be dealt with soon enough, and would prove to be an festering ulcer indeed if it were not quickly eliminated.

Demetrios had the promised lively year in Syria. The capture of Harran and Orrhoe meant that Seleukos was dangerously close to uniting his armies with those of Ptolemaios, who had finally captured Damaskos and was marching north along the Orontes, leaving behind one Sogenes to besiege the cities of Phoenike. The Poliorketes elected to engage first Seleukos, then Ptolemaios; proximity was a major factor here, as was the opportunity to catch the Seleukidai as they crossed the Euphrates. While Demetrios missed that particular opportunity, his arrival did catch Seleukos unawares when it did occur in April of 307, at the city of Bambyke. The Antigonoi, who had some twenty thousand infantry and eight thousand cavalry, were outnumbered by Seleukos, who commanded a force of twenty-six thousand infantry and an equal number in cavalry. But the Seleukidai were disorganized and their qualitative disadvantage was clear; Seleukos had had to rely on pantodapoi, ill-trained native troops, to bolster his scarce katoikiai and klerouchoi phalangitai. The difference would show in the coming battle. Demetrios decided to mass most of his cavalry on the right wing, under his personal command, to smash Seleukos’ left quickly and capitalize, relying on Seleukos’ likely decision to divide his own horsemen evenly between the two flanks to prevent a similar Seleukid success on the Antigonid left wing. Demetrios expected his phalangitai to have some success over Seleukos’ infantry, as well, and made provision to transfer some of his lighter-armed soldiers to aid the cavalry left wing in the event of success in the center. Seleukos’ plan revolved around a maneuver akin to that of Epaminondas at Leuktra, that is a deep column of attack by his phalangitai on his left wing to balance the success he expected his right wing to have. The cavalry, as expected by Demetrios, were deployed evenly from wing to wing.

When the two forces finally clashed, Demetrios rode hard to engage the Seleukid left wing, under the command of Seleukos’ satrap of Charakene, Theokles, before Seleukos himself could realize the danger and redeploy forces to meet the threat. But the disorganized Seleukid army was unable to respond in time; Theokles’ wing was split in two by the wedged Antigonoi, and annihilated. At the same time, the two groups of phalangitai began to engage. The pushing match on the Antigonid right would have ended in disaster for Demetrios had his cavalry not met with such rapid success. As it was, his Kappadokian horse and lonchophoroi medium cavalry were able to wheel into the Seleukid phalangitai’s flank, despite a temptation to pursue Theokles off the field. The addition of his cavalry at the critical moment induced a rout, which cascaded down the line as successive elements of Seleukos’ syntagma were outflanked and forced to retire. The rout was total; of the thirty-four thousand troops Seleukos had brought to the battlefield, half of them were killed or surrendered to Demetrios. Victory begat victory; the Antigonid ranks swelled with turncoats from the Babylonian basileus’ army. Pursuit allowed Demetrios to clear the west bank of the Euphrates of Seleukos’ forces; Seleukos himself returned to Orrhoe and requested reinforcements from back home. But the summer was not over yet, not by a long chalk, and now Demetrios had to turn to face the Ptolemaioi. Fortunately, Ptolemaios was as slow as ever in his advance, and his army was still on the Orontes when Demetrios, marching at speed (after having had some rest following the Battle of Bambyke), made contact near Amathe. The contest there was more inconclusive. Ptolemaios had the better of a long engagement, aided by his troops’ more rested condition and his persistent numerical superiority, but he lost some five thousand men and elected to withdraw somewhat further south, covering the operations in Phoenike but without overextending himself into Syria. Having accomplished his mission as best he could, Demetrios busied himself for the remainder of the year recruiting more men and preparing to recross the Euphrates.

Lysimachos in Makedonia renewed his campaign in 307, but earlier than expected. During the winter months, he formed his army and attempted to launch an unexpected attack on Alexandros. He had better luck in this endeavor than had Antigonos nine years prior; Alexandros was unable to scatter to ratholes as had been Eumenes’ option, and was forced to stand and fight. The resultant engagement, the Battle of the Echedoros River, saw Alexandros’ army put up a reasonable fight, but its poor positioning allowed Lysimachos to get the better of it and force much of the phalanx into the freezing cold river. Much of Alexandros’ army was drowned, and of the remainder many were recruited into Lysimachos’ force (as can be seen, it was becoming common practice among the successors to do so; success generated success, as it were). The road to Pella lay open, and the Thraikian basileus took it, along the way capturing Alexandros to be executed in front of the court and unceremoniously dumped in the Axios. The boy-king Herakles, illegitimate son of Alexandros Megas himself, was also murdered, but he received a more honorable burial at Aigai. And Lysimachos himself was crowned at Pella, adding to his title of basileus of Thraikia the more important and storied one of Makedonian king. The somewhat convenient death of Nikaia, Lysimachos’ wife and the daughter of Antipatros (no foul play, as it happened, was involved, though), allowed Lysimachos to marry into the Argeades, namely to the widow of Kassandros and the half-sister of Megas Alexandros, Thessalonike. For her, Lysimachos renamed Pella’s port from Therma to Thessalonika, and apparently the marriage was a prosperous one from the start. But the victory of the Echedoros did not mean the end of the war in Makedonia. Alexandros and Herakles may have fallen, but Alexandros’ general Pefkolaos, with the remnants of the royal army, coalesced around Pyrrhos of Epeiros, whose guardians refused to extradite the troublemakers. Lysimachos also had enemies at home to deal with; the general Epaphrodeitos still held sway in the Chalkidike, while south of Thessalia, the Hellenic poleis were totally out of control, variously declaring independence, swearing allegiance to Pyrrhos, or (in the isolated case of Demetrios Phalereus, seizing power once more in Athenai) declaring for Lysimachos. It was an almighty mess, and it would preclude action against the Molossians for now. To all intents and purposes, the Hellenic theater had been closed to Antigonos and Ptolemaios.

The beginning of 306 saw the Antigonoi clearly preeminent in the war once more. Despite setbacks in Syria, the most recent actions had gone their way, and Antigonid armies were victorious in Hayasdan and Asia Mikra as well. Ptolemaios and Seleukos knew that their time was running out; as soon as Philetairos and the Lykian expedition were smashed, both of them were in deep trouble. They needed to unite and kill Demetrios’ army quickly, for it was the last obstacle between them and a meeting on the fields of Asia Mikra and a final victory over the Antigonoi. But their own manpower reserves, as well as those of the Antigonoi, were running low. Seleukos and Ptolemaios were rapidly approaching the point at which they would have to prostrate themselves before Eumenes and beg for his intervention. An intervention in which Eumenes was not particularly interested (or capable of undertaking): the Kardian was instead concentrating on reforms at home, using the shield of the continued, draining war in the west to initiate his projects in peace. His argyraspidai, which had been settled in Susiana, were institutionalized into a formal organization, to be expanded with the elite phalangitai of the next generation; colonists from Hellas, fleeing the confusion that Lysimachos’ ascension had caused, filled the military settlements that Eumenes set up, the katoikiai and klerouchoi, providing a readily levied phalangial army of no small skill. Eumenes also began a building project in Susa, his capital, and solidified the administration system of his disparate provinces. In any event, all of these programs Eumenes had been engaging in prevented him from intervening in the Third War even if he had wanted to, though sneaking a piece of Babylonia or Hayasdan was never particularly far from his mind.

So the year of 306 began not with a Eumenid intervention but instead with Antigonos’ campaigns in Asia Mikra. That winter, he had driven Philetairos out of most of Lydia; now, he began to push towards Pergamon itself. But the Mysian satrap had one last card to play; his mercenary army was still strong, and had not engaged much with the Antigonoi; it was this army that he risked at Phokaia, as Antigonos marched along the Aigion coast towards Kidainis, port of Pergamon, to first seize that and then capture the jewel of Mysia itself. With an excellent core of cavalry and a solid mixture of both traditional, classical hoplitai and the more modernized phalangitai of the Makedonian style, aided by a detachment of the Karian Uazali light armed troops, the Pergamene army would be a formidable opponent. But Antigonos had impressive coffers too, and his army was largely made up of the veterans of the world-conquering Alexandros. His troops were elite, and they showed it at Phokaia. Philetairos attempted to use his Uazali warbands to rain javelin fire on Antigonos’ cavalry, to try to aid in outflanking his opponent; but Antigonos responded with his own troops, the excellent medium prodromoi cavalry. The Uazali scattered, and Antigonos’ troops broke the Pergamene wing; the fight in the center was more prolonged, but it was eventually resolved in Antigonos’ favor as well. Philetairos was ruined, his army smashed; he retreated back to Pergamon, which was put under siege, with Antigonos’ general Antagoras supervising. Antigonos himself took the bulk of the army south. In a series of rapid operations he cleared Pisidia and Karia of the Ptolemaioi, driving them back into Pamphylia. Pagkrates’ army eventually congregated at Side, but Antigonos refused to let up; though his forces were exhausted, and the winter was approaching, he launched an assault on the city before Kleitos the White could arrive and evacuate the Ptolemaic army, and shattered the expeditionary force. Asia Mikra was thus cleared, and extra troops freed up. To the south and east, engagements went well for the Antigonoi again. Polemaios’ success in capturing Armavir and Kotais nearly broke the back of Yervand’s remaining supporters; his victories were complemented by Demetrios’ repulse of the Ptolemaioi at Beroia and the successful assault crossing of the Euphrates that allowed Demetrios to secure a foothold in Assyria with the capture of Harran. Seleukos, fearing an engagement with his ill trained levies, withdrew to the Araxes River.
 
This tide of victory worried Eumenes, but his troops were unready to enter the fray quite yet; men needed to be called up, monies needed to be disbursed, and troops needed to be transferred from the newly quiet Margiane and Baktria. So instead he opted for monetary support. Seleukos and Ptolemaios were now able to recruit more men, and perhaps this stopgap measure would prove sufficient to halt Antigonos in 305. The chances were not great. But armed with new monies, and new confidence, Seleukos and Ptolemaios finally coordinated their attacks well. Demetrios, his rear threatened by Ptolemaios’ advance, vacated his advanced position in Assyria and fled for the comparative safety of the lands north of the Orontes. Ptolemaios and Seleukos were unable to catch Demetrios before he fled past the Amanos range into Kilikia and relative safety, but their armies were united at the very least. Seleukos urged an attack into Kilikia posthaste. Eumenes may have been far off, but Antigonos was closer, and if the opportunity to attack Demetrios was not seized now, the job of the allies would become that much harder the next time around. Ptolemaios vetoed the plan. He was unwilling to risk his army on a risky attack into Kilikia, and well knew what a skilled general could do when safely guarded by the mountains in that natural fortress. Even Demetrios would be a problem for the united allies; it was best to wait him out and trade space for time later. Thinking that this strategy meant certain doom, Seleukos threatened to withdraw from the coalition, but had his position as enemy of the Antigonoi made abundantly clear to him by Ptolemaios; there was no chance of making a separate peace with the vengeful Monophthalmos.

So Antigonos was not prevented from linking up with Demetrios successfully; the Kilikian passes to the east were guarded but the Antigonoi ably slipped through the net and emerged into northern Syria to confront Seleukos and Ptolemaios. The allies fell back, but eventually they would have to choose between retreating into Ioudaia or to Mesopotamia, and neither wished to abandon his home territories to the Antigonid depredations. Seleukos chose the ground, standing and fighting not far from the Euphrenos River, on the southern bank, to keep the Antigonoi from being at optimal fighting conditions when the two armies finally engaged. Seeing the opportunity to engage the last real field army remaining to the allies, Antigonos and Demetrios forded the river and prepared for battle. Their army was high in its proportion of trained men, heavy with klerouchoi soldiers, both veterans of the army of Megas Alexandros and new Hellenic colonists from the last two decades. From the army of Philetairos – who had just been captured with his city and was imprisoned in Kelenai awaiting execution – they had recruited some superb light-armed infantry, the aforementioned Uazali warbands. Peltastai and the assorted psiloi units were also scattered throughout the Antigonid army. Antigonos had some forty elephants left to him as well, discounting the numbers he kept safe in Phrygia in the stables. All in all, a formidable armament of some 34,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry was available to the Monophthalmos for the coming battle. On the opposite side stood the allies, who were somewhat disunited in their command but who had formidable resources nonetheless. Ptolemaios’ core of klerouchoi, the klerouchikon agema, made up the core of the phalangitai, and was possibly the best-quality unit on the field. He had levied troops from the machimoi as well, the traditional warrior class of the Aigyptioi, and armed many of them in the Makedonian fashion, as a sort of form of pezhetairoi-on-the-cheap. Seleukos brought some skilled men to the party as well. He had his own klerouchoi, though they were depleted from the fighting of the last few years. From his possessions also came excellent Median asabaran, medium cavalry that could go toe to toe (hoof to hoof?) with the prodromoi evenly. The armament was completed by the array of lightly armed troops that Ptolemaios and Seleukos had recruited from their possessions, ranging from Syrian and Kretan toxotai, skilled at long range with the bow, to Ioudaioi troops armed with both javelin and spear, to Erythraian light infantry armed with a wicked axe and their own missiles. The armies of Seleukos and Ptolemaios together numbered 39,000 infantry, with a heavy bias on the light infantry, who made up a larger percentage of the whole than they normally would have, and 7,000 cavalry, along with fifty-two elephants from the stables in Babylonia and captured at the colony of Ptolemais-Theron. All in all, it was an amazing panoply of troops from all corners of the old empire of Alexandros that prepared to engage at the Euphrenos, for a titanic clash to decide the outcome of the war.

Demetrios took command of the phalangitai for the battle; Antigonos figured that his skills would be best suited to managing the syntagmic battle that would doubtless be a close-run thing, with quality on the one hand and quantity on the other. Dealing with the elephants and the enemy light-armed troops would be more difficult. To fight the enemy beasts, missile troops would be needed, but there was fear of the enemy light-armed soldiers chasing them off. So Antigonos would need to first employ his superiority in cavalry to eliminate the enemy horsemen, then ride down the light-armed troops, which would finally clear the way for his own Uazali to fight the elephants on better terms. And all that was assuming he had time to do it. Because not only were the elephants going to be a worry, but Seleukos and Ptolemaios were planning on taking the offensive, for clearly the weight of numbers was in their favor. Seleukos, for his part, decided to position many of the elephants on the flanks, to help with the cavalry battle, for he figured the infantry would do fine on their own, at least until the flanks were secured. His overall plan was to drive the Antigonoi back against the river and slaughter them.

Seleukos’ plan relied on securing every possible advantage, and that included taking advantage of Antigonid disorganization. As soon as the Antigonoi had crossed the river, the already formed-up Seleukidai and Ptolemaioi began their march to battle. Antigonos and Demetrios had to act frantically, repositioning troops as quickly as they could and forming a semblance of a battle line. The Uazali and the elephants were sent out in the center to buy time for Demetrios to organize the syntagma, and the cavalry were led out as well, Antigonos commanding on the right wing and one Euboulides in charge of the left flank cavalry. Confronted, somewhat unexpectedly, by elephants in the center, the allied light infantry attempted to fight both at once, but Uazali that were backed up by tremendous animals such as those got the better of them and held up the advance of the allied syntagma long enough for Demetrios to reorganize his men and prepare for the onslaught. As the light-armed and elephant combat drifted to the flanks – where a furious battle was already ensuing, Antigonos having to deal with the allied elephants by improvisation - the space was cleared in the center for the two great syntagmai to clash. To weight of numbers was opposed skill, and, as it turned out, neither side could gain a real advantage. Demetrios had made sure to plant his soldiers on solid ground, far enough away from the river to avoid the mud; the advantage of the elephant and Uazali charge earlier in the battle proved extremely helpful there, as it had bought time.

With no real decision in the center, attention switched to the flanks, where Antigonos’ Uazali and elephants were joining the fray. And a fray it was, for a confused brawl had erupted, with little central control. The Monophthalmos, realizing that his troops would tire out faster – having already crossed the river that morning – elected to take action. Relying on the confusion of the fight to cover his movement, he took his agema and much of his best cavalry round the rear of the phalanx and joined Euboulides on the left flank. The added reinforcements told, and tipped the balance; Ptolemaios, who was in charge of that flank, saw what cohesion remained on his side disintegrate. Stampeding elephants were bowling over his men, and the only unit that had any semblance of order was on the other side. Ptolemaios elected to withdraw, which he did skillfully, extracting those troops that would listen and pulling back behind the syntagma. It was still some time before Antigonos could clear out the entire wing, and by that time his absence was being noticed on the right flank; he returned to his original place and left Euboulides in command of the outflanking maneuver. The advantage that control of that flank brought was critical. Seleukos’ attempts to compensate for the loss of Ptolemaios’ cavalry by switching up his infantry were broken up again and again by Euboulides, who charged the forming phalangitai and eventually broke them up. The Antigonoi were winning slightly for most of the battle, but the victory was finalized when Antigonos himself at long last broke up the enemy in front of him on the allied left wing, allowing an (albeit anorexic) double envelopment that broke up the allied phalanx and forced it into a rout.

The breakup of the allied army after the Battle of the Euphrenos signaled a new and unwelcome phase of the war. Seleukos survived the battle and managed to collect about half of his original force, retreating into Adiabene. Ptolemaios withdrew to Syria and Phoenike, where he prepared to strengthen his own defenses, and called for Kleitos the White to ravage the Anatolian coastline to try to provide a further distraction for the Antigonoi. As for Antigonos himself…it is to his credit that he immediately dispatched Demetrios to capitalize on the victory. Demetrios recaptured Assyria and was besieging Arbela by the end of the year. The basileus himself launched an attack on the Ptolemaic garrisons along the Orontes, clearing that river, and began clearly preparing for an attack on Syria-Koile. Polemaios also went on the attack aiming for Phraaspa, last stronghold of Yervand and the Haikaikan legitimists. These offensives were motivated by more than just war exhaustion, for news was already reaching the Fertile Crescent of Eumenes’ preparations. He had raised the argyraspidai and collected fifty thousand men at Susa, while Timarchos, satrap of Arachosia, led thirty thousand towards Phraaspa to aid Arkah Yervand.

Demetrios, reinforced during the winter of 305-4, drove Seleukos back in Adiabene into northern Mesopotamia, then pushed south towards Babylon. Without enough men to resist, Seleukos was forced to continue withdrawing, avoiding engagement; the Antigonids nearly caught him once, at Sittake, but he managed to escape, though he lost many of his men. Babylon was abandoned with only a garrison in the citadel, which surrendered to Demetrios upon the application of Philippos’ famed “assload of gold”. The Antigonid tide rushed south towards Charakene and the rich port there, and seized that, too. Seleukos was forced to take refuge with Eumenes, who was finally departing Susiana. The Persike basileus was preempted, though, by Demetrios himself. Having done in a few months what no one else had, capturing all Mesopotamia, he began to dream of world conquest, and probably without his father’s knowledge or permission proceeded into Eumenes’ domains. He had knowledge of the Eumenid preparations, which doubtless spurred him on; but what was more, he was styling himself as a second Alexandros already. Marching into Elymais, the Poliorketes reached the Eulaios River, upon which Eumenes was camped; following a few days of maneuvering, the two armies engaged in battle, this time to decide the fate of Ariana.

On the dusty fall Susianan plain, the Antigonid and Eumenid phangitai organized, formed up, and prepared for battle. The two armies were arranged nearly in mirror images of one another; no special formation would be adopted here. What was unusual was the absence of elephant forces. Demetrios had left his behind in Babylonia to speed his march, counting on their later return to aid his projected siege of Susa; Eumenes’ elephant train had not had time to come up. So there would be a clash of phalangitai and cavalry, more like Chaironeia or the battle of the Hellespont than any of the more recent engagements. As the two great armaments coalesced and prepared for battle, Antigenes, commander of the argyraspidai, rode out to the other syntagma on his own initiative, and shouted to the waiting soldiers of Demetrios: “You are sinning against your fathers, you degenerates, the men who conquered the world with Philippos and Alexandros!” The propaganda was effective: the spirits of Eumenes’ phalangitai, and especially the argyraspidai themselves, soared, while Demetrios’ syntagma, aware of how their own leader had never campaigned with the great basileus, much less they themselves – for the most skilled among them were levies of Antipatros from the time of the First War – began to talk amongst themselves, discontented with their lot and unhappy about having to fight against their countrymen. Only after a few minutes of haranguing did Demetrios’ cavalry chase away Antigenes; the damage had been done.

Immediately following the Antigenes episode, the light-armed forces of both sides began to engage in the middle. Demetrios had the Uazali from the coasts of Anatolia, and they were skilled indeed; but Eumenes had the ability to draw on not only the patiyodha longbows of India and the versatile Persian nizagan, but also the various psiloi common to both Hellenic and Eastern armies. Opposed to this combination, Demetrios’ troops were sadly insufficient; the Uazali were clearly worsted during the approach of the syntagmai to combat. Thereupon the engagement shifted to the flanks as the two colossal phalanxes made contact. Meanwhile, on those aforementioned flanks, Demetrios’ cavalry was having difficulties. The prodromoi were fantastic medium cavalry, but they were only effective if they actually were able to reach their enemies. Doing that was problematic when the enemies utilized the excellent Arachosian Hauravatish skirmisher cavalry and the incomparable Daha horse archers. Eumenes’ horse – led by Seleukos on the left wing, and the Persike basileus himself on the right - ably evaded Demetrios, raining javelins upon their impotent pursuers; the addition of the tired and depleted Uazali to Demetrios’ ranks did not improve his chances of victory. And in the center, the clash of titans had truly commenced. The Breaker of Cities had amassed nearly forty thousand phalangitai, recruiting men from the possessions of Seleukos and from the broken Seleukid army to bolster his father’s grand army. To oppose him, Eumenes gathered thirty-seven thousand spearmen of his own, organized in the usual Epaminondine echeloned syntagma with the argyraspidai capping the point. The immense pushing match was already tilted in Eumenes’ favor by the morale-breaking cries of Antigenes at the beginning of the fight; but it was truly the argyraspidai that decided the issue. Fighting with the same tremendous skill that they had displayed at Paraitakene and Orchoe, as invincible as they had proved themselves against the armies of the barbarian Mauryan emperor, they once more proved themselves worthy of the epithet of world-conquerors. Suffering not a single loss, they plowed through their opponents and began the collapse of the Antigonid phalanx. The infantry battle was a disaster for Demetrios within an hour of it beginning, and he plainly saw it. Fearing further losses, he pulled back with the remnant of his army, using his cavalry to ward off pursuit by the victorious Eumenids and collecting routed soldiers from his army. Eumenes elected not to pursue closely, satisfied to pick up the pieces and prepare to invade Babylonia in a few weeks.

The swan-song of the argyraspidai, last and best remnant of the army of Alexandros, was matched with victory in the north. Bolstered by the amazing cavalry of Hayasdan, Arkah Yervand and Eumenes’ general Timarchos scored a victory over Polemaios at Nakhijevan, a battle legendarily (but probably incorrectly) attributed to the same day as the Eulaios River. (It is believed that this originated with the history of Hieronymos of Kardia, satrap of Media and companion of Eumenes, his countryman; an obvious attempt to emulate the story of Plataia, where Mardonios’ army was shattered, which reportedly took place on the same day as the victory of Mykale on the other side of the Aigion.) The twin victories contrasted sharply with Antigonos Monophthalmos’ success in clearing Syria-Koile and Phoenike of Ptolemaios’ forces, but that latter victory was too little, too late. The Antigonoi would have to cut their losses and stop the fighting. Over the next few months, a series of arrangements was hashed out to mirror the Peace of the Dynasts that had concluded the previous war. Eumenes’ victory was recognized, but it did not win him Mesopotamia and Babylonia; instead, those lands were assigned to Antigonos in return for recognition of Eumenes’ control over Hayasdan. Said control took the form of the requirement of official approval from Susa in order for any Arkah to be crowned upon the death of his successor. Yervand, who had been largely responsible for the tactical planning at Nakhijevan (but who could not have even come close to doing it without the numerical superiority that Timarchos’ army gave him), was forced to acquiesce, somewhat sulkily. Ptolemaios won Phoenike and Kypros out of the deal; Syria-Koile stayed in Antigonoi hands, though, especially considering the recent victories Antigonos had made. Lysimachos was acclaimed basileus of Makedonia, with the Thraikian title downgraded again; his nominal suzerainty over the League of Korinthos was confirmed titularly, but already Antigonos and Ptolemaios were maneuvering to gain the allegiance of the Hellenic cities that nominally swore allegiance to the court at Pella. Pyrrhos, the young basileus of the Molossoi, was also recognized. A problem arose over what to do with the various important persons, like Seleukos and Pefkolaos, who had not died fighting but who had been deprived of their lands during the peace. Eumenes refused to extradite Seleukos, a concession that Antigonos, who had been lucky as it was to secure Babylonia, Charakene, and the rest of Seleukos’ old kingdom, was unable to wring after further negotiation. However, Pefkolaos and the rest were returned to Lysimachos by the Epirote nobles that served as the guardians of Pyrrhos; they recognized that their position was vulnerable, that they were still in charge only due to the sufferance of the Makedonian basileus, and that giving away Pefkolaos – even if that irked some of his former soldiers – was the best way to keep Lysimachos’ favor. Antigonos and Ptolemaios also pledged (doubtless with their fingers crossed behind their backs, as it were) to not support any of Alexandros’ remaining partisans, most notably Epaphrodeitos, who still held out in the Chalkidike annoyingly. By the early spring of 303, one could declare an end to the Third War of Alexandros’ Successors. That was not to say that fighting did not still remain – Hellas was still unpacified, Hayasdan was littered with the partisans of the dead Adaskos, trouble was brewing in Karia again, and Kyrenaia was threatening to break away from Ptolemaic control – but the Dynasts that had taken Alexandros’ place had ceased their open warfare. A new age had dawned; the time of the Diadochoi had fully arrived.
 
Fearful Symmetry.

“Do not wish ill for your enemy; plan it.”
-Publilius Syrus

By comparison with the tremendous conflict that had preceded them, the wars that bookended the fourth century BC are often referred to as brushfire conflicts, or, to alter the ‘burning’ metaphor a bit, as the dying embers of the greater Wars of the Diadochoi which briefly flared up again. To both the combatants and the shadowy figures manipulating behind the scenes, though, the wars that were offshoots of the Third War were both critically important and impressively large, even if they lacked the pageantry and raw awesome display of the Battle of the Eulaios River and the other engagements between the dynasts. And in many ways, the old Ioudaioi saying ‘no rest for the wicked’ applied to the final successors of Alexandros. With scant exception, the conflicts of this era would keep them busy until their dying days.

The most busy of them all would be Seleukos, erstwhile basileus of Mesopotamia and Babylonia. He had retained his freedom in the peace of 303, but that freedom was merely at Eumenes’ behest. Within months, the two of them were already conflicting with each other. Seleukos was bitter at Eumenes’ cession of Mesopotamia and Babylonia to Antigonos, claiming – with a good deal of legitimacy – that his ally had betrayed him. Eumenes was angered at comments like these, as well as being still sore over the actions of Seleukos in the first wars; it was clear that he had been an ally of convenience in the most recent conflict, and he wasn’t happy about that. Friction developed between the two men, culminating in the summer of 303 in a confused scuffle around Seleukos’ person that was alleged to be an assassination attempt by Eumenes; Seleukos then took his leave of Persis, going west. Traveling only with a few adherents, he adeptly evaded the Antigonoi by cutting across northern Arabia when possible, skirting the desert and keeping to the oases. In this fashion he eventually reached Ptolemaic lands, where he was greeted with some discontentment by the Lagid monarch. Ptolemaios and Seleukos had already had differences, arising during the later part of the Third War; but reluctantly, Ptolemaios took the other basileus into his safekeeping, aware of the value he could have if used against the Antigonoi. His new colleague was only one of the arsenal that Ptolemaios was building up against the Makedonians and Antigonoi. Kleitos the White had established control over part of the island of Kriti and a few of the other Aigion islands, including Naxos and Melos. Inroads had also been made into the Rhodian government, where the mercantile republic was already commercially aligned with the Ptolemaioi and had interests in Antigonid Karia; they would doubtless prove to be a solid ally in the time ahead. Ptolemaios made contacts in Sparte, too, seeking the allegiance of Areios, the Agiad king.

And there was not much of a better time to stir up trouble in Hellas than now. Lysimachos was having problems consolidating his position at home, where the vicious court life of Pellas was once again revived; this only exacerbated his military problems, from the disintegration of the League of Korinthos to the partisans of Alexandros that still littered the countryside. Of these, Epaphrodeitos was the most powerful, and the most difficult to dislodge, holding a strong position in the Chalkidike; Lysimachos thus determined to eliminate him first, and back in 305 had embarked on a siege of Kassandreia, the colony Kassandros had constructed on the site of ruined Potidaia. The siege was indecisive, though, due to Lysimachos’ lack of an effective navy, so he began to look elsewhere for aid. None, clearly, would be forthcoming from the powerful Lagid fleet, which had reclaimed preeminence in the Aigion and Mesogeios due to Antigonid neglect following the defeat at Leuke Akte. Lysimachos thus instructed his subordinate, titled satrap of Thraikia, Pantauchos, to extract from the merchant poleis of the Thraikian coast, Kallatis and Odessos, a naval armament to close off the water route to Kassandreia. Sensing weakness, the Thraikians refused, whereupon Pantauchos besieged Kallatis and stormed it within a week. Odessos soon followed, and the ships were duly dispatched; however, they were plagued by mutinies and Lysimachos considered the lot too unreliable to work all that effectively. He was right; supplies still made it through the blockade. An attempt to storm the city failed, so Lysimachos was stalemated. In order to preserve some of his prestige, he decided to give the lot up as a bad job and work on eliminating some of the easier pockets of resistance. Thessalia was made safe, and Paionia scoured. But the problem closest to home, that of Kassandreia and the remaining holdouts in the Chalkidike remained; thus Lysimachos was forced to return to the site of his earlier defeat.

And that was not even mentioning the problems that he had in southern Greece. Athenai may have allied itself with him, but Boiotia was a total mess, and Aitolia had thrown off its old shackles. In the northern Peloponnesos, the Achaians, freed from the loose allegiance that they had held to Polyperchon’s son, took initial steps to reforming their old League, centered around Patrai. Sparte, still smarting from the defeat that Antipatros had dealt it, was anxious to restore a semblance of its old dominance, and there were still more, independent poleis thrown into the mix. In short, Makedonian control was nearly nil, and Lysimachos’ enemies were already circling. Antigonos Monophthalmos was reported to have funded the Thraikian revolt, for example, and Ptolemaios’ connections with Sparte have already been elucidated. But even with knowledge of some of these behind the scenes dealings, Lysimachos could not act. He had no allies; Eumenes, dissatisfied with the western basileis in general, was concentrating on Asian affairs, and none of the other powers in the Mesogeios were particularly interested in aiding him, either. The best he could do was try to reclaim preeminence in Hellas proper. In the fall of 303 he requested aid from the Athenian fleet – rebuilt somewhat since the disaster of Amorgos – in blockading Kassandreia, which was duly given by Demetrios Phalereus. With a powerful armament on land and sea, Epaphrodeitos could not hold out for long; Kassandreia fell early in 302 and the remainder of the Chalkidike followed within a few months.

Lysimachos elected to begin a fleet-building program to augment the relatively small but skilled navy of his Athenian allies. He complemented it with a land drive to recapture Phokis, Boiotia, and Lokris, using an army boosted by forces from Epaphrodeitos’ old forces, who were induced to serve the new basileus easily enough. Disunited, the Boiotians and their neighbors fell, mustering only a ragtag army that was shattered at Orchomenos in the fall. Antigonid gold had not been enough to allow for a military coalescence, unhappily. Aitolia, graveyard of Kassandros’ armies, was avoided for now, but a land link was established with Attika, and friendly governments were put in place throughout Boiotia. Lysimachos declined to do anything about ruined Thebai, preferring to emphasize his familial and personal link with Megas Alexandros in leaving dead things dead. Having secured a strong southern frontier on the Isthmus, and being relatively safe in Hellas for now, Lysimachos prepared for a revanche on the seas. By 300, he deemed his navy complete, and used an expedition against Lesbos, erstwhile member of the defunct League of Korinthos whose helm Lysimachos still claimed, as sea trials. The next target was clearly Rhodos. Lysimachos issued an ultimatum to the republic, attempting to cow them into recognizing his ascendancy, and it nearly worked, too, for the Rhodioi were opposed to anything that would detract from their commercial enterprises and offered to allow Lysimachos use of their shipyards and part of their revenues. But the basileus in Pella went overboard; impressed with the concessions he had already extracted, and endowed with hubris from his recent Hellenic exploits, he demanded a hundred citizen hostages in addition to what he already had, to ensure good behavior. Ares, leader of the assembly at Rhodos, angrily refused, giving Lysimachos cause to embark from Mytilene in the summer of 300 with an expeditionary force clearly aimed at the conquest of Rhodos.

The Rhodioi thus cried for aid from the Ptolemaioi and the Antigonoi, and both sides were willing to help monetarily, and Ptolemaios promised the eventual assistance of Kleitos’ fleet. With the ample warning that only the tremendous merchant fleet of Rhodos could supply, the city was fortified; monies disbursed by the Antigonoi and Ptolemaioi were used to hire mercenaries from nearby Karia, and to boost the citizen levy. Lysimachos was thus met with a well prepared enemy when he disembarked on the island; nevertheless, the prestige lost from failure would be too great to turn back. The Rhodioi made no attempt to resist Lysimachos’ army outside the walls of the city, and instead turned their attentionto resisting from the walls. An epic duel of mines and countermines began, with the Rhodioi holding the upper hand; this forced Lysimachos to resort to the expedient of siege engines. Attempting to build a siege tower to approach the high walls of Rhodos was probably out of the question, especially considering the Makedonians’ somewhat limited resources (this also prevented the construction of a mole); however, rams were made to try to break the gates. Attempts were made to bribe guards and hire saboteurs, but the Rhodioi, who were flush with cash from Ptolemaios and Antigonos, were able to outbid their attackers. And finally, a naval attack on the harbor was mounted, due to Lysimachos’ frustration with the ineffectiveness of his blockade; it failed, though not with significant casualties. With the approach of winter, Lysimachos withdrew, having failed to wring any concessions from the Rhodioi whatsoever and having added them to the ever-growing ranks of his enemies.

He would not merely have abandoned the siege as a bad job had he not heard the news from the Hellenic mainland. Ptolemaios had aided the Rhodioi materially after all; operating from the Kretan base, Kleitos the White had landed Seleukos at Athenai, where a popular uprising against the excesses of Demetrios Phalereus was provoked. This was motivated by not merely the Lagid wish to see Lysimachos unseated, but also to a desire to get rid of Seleukos and cause further trouble in Europe. The effort was largely successful. In early 299, Seleukos attacked the riot-riven city of Athenai, capturing Demetrios and executing him to popular acclaim. From the Athenian base, Seleukos recruited more men, with financial support from Ptolemaios; he then marched as a liberator into Boiotia, unseating Lysimachos’ supporters and installing new governments. Refounding Thebai as a base in Boiotia, Seleukos moved north through Thermopylai with scant opposition. Eventually Lysimachos felt ready to fight his opponent, standing at Euhydrion in Thessalia; outnumbering Seleukos by some 7,000 men, most of that in cavalry, he inflicted a defeat on his opponent and forced him back. But Seleukos, canny strategist that he was, didn’t flee south, but instead moved into Epeiros, to gain the support of Pyrrhos, who had just reached his majority. Pyrrhos was not particularly inclined to go off on military adventurism, but the opportunity to eliminate an enemy of his was too good to pass up; Seleukos thus added Molossian troops to his army and wintered at Dodone, near the famed Oracle of Zeus, as Lysimachos, unable to take advantage of Seleukos’ absence from Boiotia because of the threat in his rear, stayed in Thessalia.

The renewal of the contest in 298 was accompanied by an Antigonid seizure of Lesbos, using a fleet commanded by Demetrios; in his usual example of poliorketics, Demetrios broke the defenses of Methymna and Mytilene and drove the Makedonian garrison off the island. Losing yet another of his allies spurred Lysimachos to action; he marched into Epeiros, fighting an inconclusive action at Argithea with Seleukos, who bestirred himself from his Dodonian fastness. A war of maneuver commenced in the Pindos, with Lysimachos attempting to keep Seleukos trapped in Epeiros despite having fewer men than his opponent. Eventually Seleukos tired of the game and, with young Pyrrhos as second-in-command, marched into battle at Aiginion. This time, the engagement proved decisive. Pyrrhos provided the decisive stroke; Lysimachos’ infantry had pushed back part of the Epirote syntagma, but that opened up gaps in the formation through which the young Molossian king led his personal cavalry agema, snatching success from the jaws of defeat and collapsing the royal Makedonian army. Lysimachos withdrew in shame, and Seleukos pursued him, inflicting further defeat at Erinikion a few weeks later. In the sequel, Lysimachos was forced to vacate Makedonia proper and return to Thraikia; he was dethroned in absentia and Seleukos took his place.

At this point, other concerns intervened for most of the powers. In the fall of 298, Antigonos Monophthalmos died of old age – or poison; there were insinuations of foul play by one of his satraps - and was succeeded by his son, Demetrios, who proceeded to the usual post-coronation rebel smackdown, beginning with a certain noble of Kios who was stirring up trouble in Karia, allegedly with Rhodian assistance. Ptolemaios was tempted to invade Syria-Koile to take advantage of the Antigonid troubles, but himself was distracted by a relative’s revolt in Kyrenaia. So the field was cleared once more in Hellas, with no outside intervention; and the tide was turning against Seleukos once more. Pyrrhos, now less than overjoyed with his erstwhile ally, had brought his Molossian phalangitai back home. Seleukos was now alone against Lysimachos, who pressed his Thraikian vassals for renewed military commitments and got them. Outnumbered, Seleukos barely put up a fight in front of Pella when Lysimachos launched his counterattack in 296; he instead elected to retire into Boiotia behind the fortifications of Thermopylai and rebuild his army, waiting for his rival to slip up. He did not have to wait long. Lysimachos’ enemies were many and his reach was too great for his means; as it happened, he was in Thessalia preparing to pursue his rival when, in 295, Makedonia was invaded by Keltoi barbarians, who had already been pressuring the Triballi and Paionioi to the north. Forced to abandon the project of invasion of Boiotia, Lysimachos hurried north, but his army was shattered by the barbarians at Atalante. The stage was now cleared for Seleukos. During the later part of the year and early 294, he passed through Thermopylai and relieved the besieged Pella, inflicting a tremendous defeat on the Keltoi at the Battle of the Axios. Makedonia was saved, and Seleukos went about recovering the old pieces of Lysimachos’ kingdom, defeating his longtime lieutenant Pantauchos with the aid of the hoplitai of Kallatis and Odessos, who were happy to have anyone replace Lysimachos.

The institution of the Seleukid dynasty as basileis of Makedonia is sometimes regarded as the final major act in the drama of the Diadochoi. But all concerned still had parts to play and positions to solidify. The somewhat passed-over Arche Antigoneia was concerned with establishing firm control over Anatolia and Syria, the heartlands, but the more distant territory of Babylonia was also important; this especially because Charax was a primary source of revenue for the empire, with a profitable and growing Indian trade. Antigonos I had already embarked on building a capital on the Orontes in Syria to better manage the Mesopotamian territories as it was; it was completed by his son in 293 and promptly named Antigoneia after the founder of the dynasty. Antigoneia also benefited from the Charakene trade, serving as an entrepot at the Mediterranean and rapidly attracting new settlers. Demetrios initiated the usual practice of attracting Hellenic and Makedonian colonists to live on the military colonies, the klerouchoi and katoikiai. He also, along with the other diadochoi, began the construction of modern cookie-cutter cities organized on a grid pattern, laid out sensibly. Into these new urban centers flooded colonists from Hellas proper, motivated by the conflict there and the relative peace of the Eastern domains. Demetrios also scored a major coup when he convinced Menandros, the famed Athenian playwright, to come to his court near the end of his life, motivated in part by the tyranny established by Seleukos at Athenai and the more liberal sensibilities of the earlier Demetrian reign.

Ptolemaios’ territories to the south of the Arche Antigoneia were if anything more successful. What the basileus in Aigyptos, who styled himself pharaoh, could not accomplish by force of arms (and there was much he could not do in that field) he did by intrigue and peaceful means. Phoenike declined somewhat due to the shift in trade to the north somewhat, but the new city of Alexandria, Ptolemaios’ capital and the site of the last resting place of Megas Alexandros himself (who served as a kind of lucky talisman, according to some), more than made up for it. Ptolemaios, canny administrator that he was, took advantage of the Erythraian trade as best he could, following up the establishment of the colony-port of Ptolemais-Theron with that of Eurydikaia, named after his favorite wife. The ensuing wealth that flowed into the coffers of the Lagid monarchy were used not only to finance the hijinks in the Aigion during the 290s but also for impressive public works projects and the expansion of Alexandria, not to mention the establishment of klerouchoi and planned cities. Triakontaschoinos, a region on the borders of Nubia, was also conquered by Ptolemaios personally in 296-4, which along with other exploits – including his victory over Perdikas a generation prior – led him to adopt the title of Soter, savior. Providing for his succession was somewhat tricky but eventually his firstborn son, by the aforementioned Eurydike, named Ptolemaios, was made heir. This Ptolemaios was surnamed Keraunos, with good reason; he, like the thunderbolt, had a tendency to act rapidly, if not rashly. It was a quality that the father did not have, and would doubtless signal a sea change in the policy of the Lagid monarchy upon the son’s accession. For now, though, Ptolemaios Keraunos was saddled with easier tasks, such as leading the army into Kyrenaia that crushed the most recent revolt there.

Eumenes’ empire did not have to deal with the excitement in the Aigion like the others did, but it had its own episodes of interest all the same. As Susa was built up and other cities were refounded and/or expanded – Ekbatana and Persepolis chief among these – the region attracted its own immigrants, settled in the same military colonies that were established throughout the Antigonid and Lagid domains. The Indos front remained surprisingly quiet. Chandragupta Maurya had apparently given up those lands, though periodically an army would be sent up to rattle sabers and inspire a Eumenid countermobilization. But the Indians seemed mostly content to trade, and Eumenes took full advantage of that, seizing Maketa on the other side of the Kolpos Persikos to fully control the trade routes, and expanding the port for Pura in Arachosia as a further entrepot (though it still remained a relatively minor source of revenue). Eumenes also notably commissioned his satrap and kinsman Hieronymos to write the aforementioned history of the wars of the Diadochoi, a project that he had only just begun by the end of the 290s decade; Hieronymos’ ability to draw on both personal experience and the vast libraries of the basileus – for an effort was made to rebuild the Persepolitan library, to reclaim at least a shred of glory from the earlier Persian empire – made his history an excellent source for future historians. Dynastic issues were more easily resolved than in Aigyptos, for here Eumenes had taken but one wife, and she at the behest of Megas Alexandros himself. His son, one Aristotelis, easily ascended to the purple upon Eumenes’ quiet death in 291, and early on showed every sign of being highly competent, if not the genius his father had been.

Seleukos’ monarchy in Makedonia early on showed signs of greater stability than that of the late Lysimachos. The former Babylonian satrap showed no indication of having the patience for court intrigue and cracked down hard with a combination of overt threats from an extremely loyal army and covert informers and secret police. Thessalia was further integrated (and its amazingly powerful hippeis Thessalikoi heavy cavalry were made a key part of the Seleukid army), and in some Boiotian cities, governors were imposed instead of mere garrisons. The navy was restored – the 292 bribing of Kleitos the White and a significant portion of the Ptolemaic fleet significantly aided this (the sequel was the murder, by Seleukos, of the traitor, figuring he couldn’t trust a man who turned his back on Ptolemaios). Seleukos also, in 291, campaigned north to the Istros, accepting the nominal submission of the tribes who lived between those lands, and adding significant contingents of rhomphaiaphoroi to his army. The remainder of Hellas was not quite so quiescent. Pyrrhos, the Epirote basileus, was somewhat dissatisfied with his lack of real gain out of the Makedonian succession wars, and began to look further afield for opportunities for conquest. The death of his old guardian Glaukias of Illyria opened a possible door, as did the situation in Sikilia, from where Pyrrhos’ wife came and to which he felt a familial bond.

The Sikilian situation, in fact, requires elucidation. Agathokles, a local tyrant who had briefly seized power in the city of Syrakousai from 319 to 318, had been driven out by the citizenry but later returned the next year after a short exile at Morgantina. In 316 he had been elected strategos autokrator at Syrakousai in a strange shadow of the position that Eumenes was solidifying to the east that same year. Over the next few years he fought a war with those he had exiled from the city, and extended Syrakousan control over the surrounding lands. In 312, as the Peace of the Dynasts was being wrapped up, Agathokles exiled Timaios of Tauromenion, and extended his control over much of Sikilia, building up a powerful armament on both land and sea that rivaled those of the Makedonian lords in northern Hellas. But this was the last straw, and a Qarthadastim expedition was dispatched to crush the overweening tyrannos. At Himera in 311 he was disastrously defeated by one Hamilcar, following the Qarthadastim relief of the siege of Akragas, and in the sequel his conquests of the previous few years were totally reversed and he retained only Syrakousai itself. No single battle was enough to keep Agathokles down, however, and even as Hamilcar blockaded Syrakousai he led an expedition to Africa itself in a last throw of the dice. In August he arrived at Tunes and seized the city, smashing the army that the Qarthadastim brought back from Sikilia and then following it up with more maneuvers around Qarthadast itself. Inspired by his success, Ophellas, one of the leaders of the Kyrenaian revolt who was fleeing the wreck of that project, put down by Ptolemaios, sailed to Africa and allied with Agathokles. In the following year he was betrayed and murdered by the Syrakousan tyrannos, and his army absorbed, an action which allowed Agathokles to storm Udtaq. But even this added manpower was unable to match a mobilized Qarthadast, and Agathokles was forced to return to Sikilia in 308 to retrieve the situation there and relieve the blockade. He succeeded in that, but his army in Africa had been pushed back in his absence; he checked the Qarthadastim progress briefly but was finally defeated the following year, whereupon he fled back to Sikilia and agreed to a compromise peace, assigning Syrakousai the eastern two-thirds of the island, to wit, all lands east of the Halykos River, including the contentious Akragas; this was the same boundary that Timoleon, great champion of the Sikeliotes, had won after the Krimissos. The Poeni received all western lands.

Agathokles’ attempt to style himself basileus Sikilioi in 304 heralded a new era in Sikeliotian politics, as he established stronger control over the Hellenic poleis and rebuilt his mercenary forces. For nine years after 302 he campaigned in southern Italia, among the poleis of Megale Hellas, with mixed success. One of the more important episodes here was his 298 seizure of Korkyra, off the Epirote coast, an act that cannot have endeared him to Pyrrhos and was a cause for friction between the two basileis in the coming years. His wars in Megale Hellas involved a transitory seizure of Kroton and an abortive siege of Hipponion. At the same time he kept his finger in the dynastic pie by marrying a daughter of Ptolemaios, and attempting to allay the suspicions of Pyrrhos by having one of his own daughters, Lanassa, married off to the basileus of Epeiros, awarding him the right to inherit Korkyra upon Agathokles’ death. (It is believed that this 295 marriage caused Pyrrhos to instigate Agathokles’ grandson, Archagathos, to attempt to poison the Syrakousan basileus. The failure of the assassination attempt cost Archagathos his life.) Pyrrhos’ ties to Lanassa were not all that strong, though, and there was always the danger of another, more eligible bride coming along somewhere and stealing him away.

Thus the situation as the decade of the 290s BC ended can be described as nothing other than volatile. Despite the end of the struggles of the original diadochoi, their empires were still ready to fight tooth and claw for existence, and revanche was planned by many. The Hellenistic world, still in its infancy, was about to be sent into confusion and upheaval once more.
 
Reclaimer.

“Outside in the distance a wildcat did growl,
two riders were approaching, the wind began to howl.”
-All Along the Watchtower, Bob Dylan

It is said that Agathokles, basileus of Sikilia, successful in his war on Qarthadast, was one of the better tyrannoi that had graced the polis of Syrakousai, not least because he had brought conflict to the sands of Africa and marched throughout Megale Hellas, but because his orders on his death were to reestablish the democracy that he himself had ruined decades before. That death, which came peacefully in 288 BC, was met with joy by many in Sikilia, who saw it as the benevolent removal of shackles. It was well received in wintry Dodone as well. Pyrrhos, basileus of Epeiros, had legitimate claim to any throne in Syrakousai, and to Agathokles’ assumed title of basileus of Sikilia, due to his marriage to Lanassa, Agathokles’ daughter. Thus he prepared an armament to cross over to the island and take what he claimed was rightfully his. But Epeiros was not alone enough for his armies; he needed more than just Molossi to make up his forces. Requests were sent out to Seleukos in Makedonia and Ptolemaios in Aigyptos; both contributed mercenaries, not least since they wished to be rid of the threat of the dangerous Pyrrhos on their borders. He set sail from Ambrakia in the spring of 287 for Sikilia with 30,000 men, and news of his impending arrival brought fear to the hearts of the peoples of Megale Hellas.

Agathokles’ death in 288 was mirrored by that of another of the diadochoi in the following year. Ptolemaios, monarch of Aigyptos, who had so recently granted aid to Pyrrhos, died under highly mysterious circumstances; it was contended then and now that he was poisoned by his son, Ptolemaios II, titled Keraunos, the Thunderbolt. Ptolemaios II was not the careful politician his father had been; what marked him was audacity. He immediately set to preparing a new land army, though what target he intended was up in the air and secret even to his closest advisors. Under Chairas Larnakaios, the fleet was rebuilt (the defection of Kleitos the White still having to be rectified by vengeance against the Seleukidai in Makedonia), with extra flair; special monies were set aside to build a few vast flagships, with many more banks of oars than the usual three to five. By 285 he was ready to launch his fleet and dispatch his army, and his choice of target was likely influenced by news of earlier that year, when he learned that Demetrios, ruler of the Arche Antigoneia, had drunk himself to death and was succeeded by his son Antigonos II, surnamed Gonatas. While Antigonos was occupied putting down a Pontic revolt, Ptolemaios Keraunos made his move, declaring war on his northern neighbor and dispatching Chairas from Kypros, while leading his own army overland towards Damaskos. The Syrian War had begun.

Antigonos was hobbled by his absence in Pontos, but he had marshals in the south to try to take care of the situation in his stead. Specifically, one Chrysoloras, who was satrap of Syria-Koile and who had amassed 40,000 men to block the Ptolemaic way to Damaskos, attempted to launch a counterattack to stall the Ptolemaioi in northern Ioudaia. At Lake Samachonites, Chrysoloras attacked the Lagid encampment but a hasty rallying of the Lagid troops around the person of the pharaoh and his basilikon agema, an elite version of the flexible thureophoroi infantry that were already making a significant appearance in many Hellenic armies. Chrysoloras’ army was defeated in the confusion and he had to withdraw northwards to Damaskos; in the sequel, his army was trapped in the besieged city and forced to surrender. In Lykia and Pamphylia, Chairas deposited 25,000 men under the command of one Stephanos Anemurionios, who earned his epithet by a victory at that selfsame Cape over an Antigonid garrison force, whereupon he besieged and captured Korakesion and Side. Chairas then proceeded to the Aigion, where he preyed on Antigonid commerce and blockaded Lesbos. Antigonos elected to gamble on Damaskos’ holding out long enough for him to resolve the Pontic situation, and so didn’t retreat south; this was a mistake, as Ptolemaios was, as previously mentioned, able to force Chrysoloras’ surrender and a rapid opening of the road to Antigoneia. Keraunos thus merely had a leisurely march down the Orontes before he entered the unguarded Antigonid capital, but characteristically he wasted no time in getting there anyway, and thus reached Antigoneia long before Gonatas had come south.

With the fall of the Antigonid capital, the war seemed over, but Antigonos refused to surrender. Ptolemaios thus embarked on a series of campaigns to try to clear the Antigonoi out of the peripheral imperial territories with little to mixed success. Antigonos led an army into Assyria, but upon pursuit denied battle and merely retreated into Mesopotamia and Babylonia, lands into which Ptolemaios was loathe to venture, being rather far away from his main base. Instead, the pharaoh contented himself with seizing the main cities of Antigonid control in southern Asia Mikra and along the Aigion coast, preparing for other expeditions. For already after the lightning campaign of 285-4 Ptolemaios had aroused the jealousy and the enmity of his fellow dynasts; Seleukos and Aristotelis were both preparing to clandestinely aid Antigonos if necessary to prevent Aigyptian success. Wasting time in consolidating those outer territories, such as Sophene, Bithynia, and the Mesopotamian satrapies, which still swore allegiance to Antigonos, would be a fool’s errand if it prevented him from meeting the coming onslaught with his full fury. Keraunos was ever seeking new targets upon which to expend his martial ardor.

A new possibility emerged in the west. Pyrrhos of Epeiros had easily and swiftly established a dominion over Hellenic Sikilia and Agathokles’ former possessions in Megale Hellas. But the Sikeliotes were already complaining of his autocracy, and threatening to overturn his rule; he thus decided on a further foreign adventure, to distract them from his domestic issues. His target: the Qarthadastim, whom the Hellenes called ‘Karchedoni’, ostensibly to finish what Agathokles began. So in 286 Pyrrhos had led an army across the Halykos into Qarthadastim territory, and engaged one of their armies in front of the walls of Lilibeo, securing a victory and, after a siege assault, the city as well. With the fall of the principal Qarthadastim stronghold on the island, the remaining cities of Sikilia defected to Pyrrhos as well, giving him full control and allowing him to contemplate an invasion of Africa itself. Such an invasion became near-certainty when the assembly at Qarthadast flatly refused to grant him title over their captured colonies, and Pyrrhos began to muster his fleet once more. Ptolemaios saw in this western confusion a chance to claim lands that not even Megas Alexandros had conquered before his untimely death, and so allied with Pyrrhos and undertook to bring a fleet and expeditionary force to Qarthadast, leaving the redoubtable Anemurionios in charge of the home territories.

As Pyrrhos landed near Udtaq in Zeugitana in the summer of 284, Ptolemaios’ second prong appeared in the south at Lepki. Opposing the both of these armies was a single army of some 50,000 men, both mercenaries and native troops, under the command of the Qarthadastim senate’s favorite of the year, one Admetos. Admetos was not unskilled; he clearly saw that to oppose both of these men at the same time would be folly, and decided to fight against Pyrrhos first, quite reasonably using proximity as a good threat indicator. But his most important move was not a military one, or at least not directly. With a speech that has gone down as one of the most eloquent pieces of work to come out of Qarthadastim oratory, Admetos called for an alliance with the greatest power in Italia – the republic of the Romani. His argument, that Pyrrhos and the Ptolemaioi were too great an enemy to combat alone, was accepted by the assembly, and fast ships were dispatched to Latium to persuade the Roman Senate. Their own job was made easier by events in southern Italia. Pyrrhos’ son, Demetrios, had been placed in charge of Megale Hellas and was making trouble. In particular, the polis of Taras, which had already made a treaty with the Romani over naval rights, was put under contributions to the Pyrrhic war machine. Their own representatives arrived at Roma at the same time as those of the Qarthadastim did. Gaius Fabricius Luscinus, who had served as ambassador to Taras, lent his voice in support of an alliance and a declaration of war upon Pyrrhos. With some difficulty, the Senate agreed, and Luscinus – who easily won the consulship of 283 – was entrusted with his half of the army to march to southern Italia and confront Demetrios.

The widening war drew in more participants all the time. As Luscinus was preparing his descent on Megale Hellas, word arrived that Seleukos, who had in the past few years titled himself Euergetes for his patronage projects, was amassing his own armament to invade Pyrrhos’ Epirote lands. This, as it turned out, was a false alarm, for Seleukos died of old age that spring and his son, Antiochos, was less inclined to embark on crazy projects like an opportunistic invasion of Epeiros. But it spurred Pyrrhos to finish his mission in Africa and then return to the east. Thus far he had not been successful in opposing Admetos, while Ptolemaios had already seized Lepki and was marching north along the coast towards Byzakena. Eager to beat his rival to the prize, Pyrrhos determined on an engagement with Admetos, and quickly; adeptly maneuvering his enemy into a corner, displaying the generalship for which he would ever be known, the basileus of the Sikeliotes and Molossi forced Admetos to fight at the Bagradas River. The Qarthadastim army’s core, the Leebi-Feenikim infantry, was strong, and could stand toe to toe with Pyrrhos’ phalangitai – some were armored in the same manner as the Hellenic thureophoroi, and some, the aanatim, were pikemen just like the Molossi that stood against them. And of course, they were bolstered by the kdoshim, the famed Qarthadastim Sacred Band. But the majority of Admetos’ forces were comprised of caetrati, Iberian light infantry, and these could not stand up to Pyrrhos’ regulars. Despite not losing the cavalry battle, the infantry in Admetos’ army were thrown back, and he was forced to retire. Pyrrhos’ own casualties had been severe, though, and his pursuit was dilatory; this gave the Qarthadastim time to reinforce the defenses of their own city such that Pyrrhos was unlikely to crack them quickly. The fuming Molossian basileus instead was forced to sit down for a siege.

His spirits were not improved by the news from southern Italia. Fabricius Luscinus had performed ably against Demetrios (outnumbering his opponent helped, as did the mercenary phalangitai he recruited while in the south, which boosted his numbers even higher). Demetrios had attempted to preempt the Roman attack on his territory by advancing into Samnium and attempting to raise the recently defeated Samnitici against their Roman conquerors, but he could only secure what troops he could pay for – though the mercenary Samnitici infantry were quite useful, as were the Leukanoi aichmetai light infantry. At Potentia, the two opposing systems of war clashed the first time. The Romani fought in the system of more heavily armed thureophoroi, with swords their main weapon instead of spears. Their heavy infantry were divided into three lines, only one of which would ever engage the enemy at one time; the first line, hastati, were the youngest and most lightly armed, the principes were a middling force, comprised of more experienced, older men with heavier armor, and the triarii, the final line, were the oldest line and armed most like the thureophoroi, with spears as their primary weapons. The Romani were also backed up by the heavy infantry of their Italian allies (or socii), the pedites extraordinarii, and their citizen cavalry, the equites, had a similar reinforcement in the equites extraordinarii. This army was more flexible than the typical syntagma, more able to fight on rough ground; and rough ground was what met the inexperienced Demetrios at Potentia. Fabricius Luscinus totally outfought his enemy, exploiting gaps in the syntagma made by the rougher ground; the thureophoroi that could have retrieved the situation were poorly utilized by the young Epirote general. His army was badly beaten and driven back into Kroton as the Romani rapidly overran his father’s territories.

This, combined with the lack of success he was having in Africa, prompted Pyrrhos to take ship from Udtaq in early 282 with most of his army, first to Sikilia, where a revolt was crushed, thence to Rhegion, which was coerced into joining him. Ptolemaios, back in Africa, was left to fume, but grimly pushed on anyway. As for Pyrrhos himself – he first outmaneuvered the new Roman consular army, led by one P. Valerius Laevinus, that was besieging his son in Kroton. He then amalgamated the two armies and marched north, where Laevinus was recruiting local mercenaries into his army. The Romani were forced to fight the Epirote forces at Sybaris, in northern Bruttium. This time, their opponent was better practiced in the military arts; he also slightly outnumbered the Roman consular army, which had some 32,000 men to his 37,000. Pyrrhos had also chosen a better spot for his phalangitai, who were not forced to operate on rough ground. His cavalry, drawn from not only Sikeliot mercenaries but also Tarantinoi hippeis, the best light horse in the world, was superior in quality and number. But opposing him were the hard-bitten Romani veterans, who themselves had a superb fighting skill and armament all their own, in a class by themselves. On the plain between the hills and the kolpos Tarantinos, only a few miles wide, the two armies clashed.

Pyrrhos’ army was organized differently than the usual syntagma, to try to take advantage of the coastal position. A few thousand of his Tarantinoi horse were posted on the far right flank, next to the sea, but there were no other covering units over there; too, his weakest phalangitai were on the right flank and center, instead of the normal position at the left wing. The deuteroi levies there were meant mostly as a holding force, as it happened. Demetrios was left with a body of thureophoroi as a kind of reserve, to plug up any holes in the right wing. Pyrrhos himself commanded the troops on the left flank. Organized in a deep column of attack, with his personal agema Chaionioi, a formation equivalent to the argyraspidai of the Eumenid armies, at the forefront and his pezhetairoi, the elite landed phalangitai, forming the remainder. His pheraspidai, a special Epirote formation that combined peltastai, hypaspistai, and thureophoroi into a well-armored, but mobile light infantry that had both javelin and sword, were amalgamated with his cavalry, which had Tarantinoi horse, Africans and Sikeliotes, and Pyrrhos’ personal Molosson agema, a formation that was lighter than the famed hetairoi of Makedonia, the better to fight in the mountains of Epeiros. It was clearly Pyrrhos’ plan to emulate Epaminondas at Leuktra, as it were (and, Seleukos at Bambyke, though the latter had had much less success, due to an advantage that the Romani, conveniently, did not hold), and smash the Romani right wing and cavalry, then turn upon the remainder and drive them into the sea. Opposed to them, the Romani had organized their usual – but still almost mystifying to the Hellenic phalangitai – triplex acies, a most economical formation which only required a third of the infantry to fight at any given time. It remained to be seen how these infantry would perform on flat ground against a phalangitai army, handled by an expert.

The obligatory light-infantry duel ended slightly in favor of the Epirote army, who had the advantage of a more diverse arm of service in the psiloi, backed up by peltastai and local Leukanoi aichmetai. This advantage, however, ended up not amounting to much, for the hastati were able to chase the Epirote light troops away rapidly upon approach, allowing for the epic clash in the center. The impact of the Chaionioi nearly broke the Romani line, but it was reformed with aid from the principes; what ensued was an almighty pushing match. And while that was going on, the other phalangitai slowly began to engage on the other parts of the battlefield. Their cumulative impact broke the hastati, forcing the principes and the triarii fully into the battlefield, and inducing Laevinus to re-commit the rorarii and accensii – lightly armed skirmishers and slingers, respectively – to try to have a semblance of holding his troops together in front of the phalangial meatgrinder. And the cavalry battle did not go well either. Pyrrhos simply vastly outnumbered Laevinus’ horse, especially since the Romani had, for whatever reason, decided to post half their cavalry on the seaward flank, where it was easily kept in check by the light Tarantinoi. The Roman right flank was simply shattered by weight of numbers, numbers that were however not to prove as useful to Pyrrhos as they might have. Upon the defeat of the Romani horse, the Molossi turned and pursued en masse, failing to deliver the hammer-and-anvil blow to the rear of the legion as they, by rights, ought to have done. The sudden absence of the Epirote cavalry from the field – along with the Epirote general – allowed Laevinus, who had been posted with the left wing, to rally his army and prevent total rout. For another hour the Romani clawed their way back from the brink of defeat, before Pyrrhos returned with his horsemen and provided the critical balance-tipping mass to throw the epic pushing match on the Romani right wing into the Epirote favor. With the collapse of their right wing, the Romani army disintegrated, with Laevinus making a good effort at keeping some cohesion, aided a good deal by the onset of twilight, a factor that would have been avoided had Pyrrhos not abdicated the field. All told, the Romani lost nine thousand men, and Pyrrhos suffered but four thousand, and these among the mercenaries – an act which improved the extremely dangerous situation in the Epirote exchequer, considering Pyrrhos’ reliance on troops for high pay.
 
In the aftermath of the victory of Sybaris, Pyrrhos began his great march northward on Roma itself. Believing himself master of the country, he thought that all that was necessary was to make a show of force in front of the notably undefended – or at least unfortified – capital for a peace negotiation to be put forth. To his surprise, his ambassadors were jeered in the Senate of the Romani, their proposition for the Roman cession of Campania and Samnium (as well as recognizing Pyrrhos’ suzerainty over Megale Hellas, what they called “Magna Graecia”) thrown out without consideration. For the Romani were no Hellenic pushovers; they had endured far worse setbacks in their wars on the Samnitici and the Etrusci than a single lost battle. But their fate looked grim. Pyrrhos besieged several cities in Campania, and though Nola and Capua held out, Cumae and Volturnum opened their gates to the invader, who pushed northwards into Latium. But Pyrrhos had not remembered the Roman way of war; always was the civilian levy divided into two consular armies. The second of these, under the command of Publius Decius Mus, barred the way into Roma. Pyrrhos, with the full knowledge that Laevinus’ battered army was besieging his new Campanian conquests and approaching him from the rear, decided that prudence, for one of the first times in his career, was to be valued higher than audacity. After sacking Praeneste, he withdrew down the eastern coast of the peninsula back to his Megale Hellenic territories for the winter, and the Romani reoccupied Samnium and Campania.

His comrade in arms Ptolemaios had fared better. Byzakena was under his sway, culminating in the siege and capture of Adrumeto. Admetos, who had begun to lose favor, was unable to engage his opponent or even draw him off from the siege. A projected attack on Qarthadast by the Ptolemaioi had to be scratched from next year’s schedule, however, for Ptolemaios received word from his other holdings of serious trouble. The ultimate comeback kid, Antigonos Gonatas, using his army and a few not-so-discreet reinforcements courtesy of Aristotelis in Susa, had reinvaded his possessions in Asia, recaptured his capital Antigoneia, and was engaged in a war of maneuver with Stephanos Anemurionios in Syria-Koile. The situation was grave in the east, and it was not the time for conquest in the west to the clear detriment of the rest of Ptolemaios’ empire. So this project, too, was abandoned. Charinos, another handy lieutenant, was placed in command of a vastly shrunken African garrison while Ptolemaios and most of the main army took ship back to Aigyptos to rectify the situation. But, always opportunistically looking out for conquest, he stopped off at Kriti on the way and seized control of the remainder of the island within a few months, an act which outraged much of the Aigion littoral. Considering it a relatively minor price to pay for another base from which to plan a descent on Hellas, Ptolemaios let it go and proceeded eastward.

Ptolemaios Keraunos’ presence rejuvenated his troops in Asia. Antigonos was sharply defeated at Antarados in the spring of 281 and driven out of Syria again. Antigoneia once more fell to the Ptolemaic armies. Keraunos was not interested in trying to repel another of these invasions, however, and elected to pursue Gonatas across the Euphrates. Despite somewhat heavy casualties incurred at Philai, where Antigonos turned and demonstrated that this was clearly not over, making a sneak attack on Ptolemaios while he was engaged in crossing the river, slaying some eight thousand of the Lagid army for negligible losses of his own. This near-disaster merely spurred Ptolemaios on further. Antigonos was brushed aside in northern Mesopotamia, Babylon was blockaded but no time was wasted on a siege. Ptolemaios was able to camp in northern Charakene by the end of the year, having forced-marched all the way from Syria in that time. He had not finished, though. Charax was his new target; as the source of much of the Antigonid revenue, it would give Ptolemaios a monopoly over the growing Indian trade and solidify his power. Not to mention, of course, it was where Antigonos Gonatas had holed up, with his army. Antigonos fled into Gerrhaia before the city was invested, though, taking to the last of his disparate outposts in the desperate hope that there was one place where he could recoup his losses and strike back. This left the city wide open to Ptolemaios, who seized the place. But the dangers of having such a widely spread out empire soon became apparent. Antigonos was saved by further news that Ptolemaios’ empire was crumbling in the west. Chairas had been pushed out of Africa by a resurgent Admetos, who had even reclaimed Lepki – that much was foreseen by the pharaoh, and expected. But Admetos was already bivouacking in Kyrenaia, coming close to threatening Aigyptos itself. And that was not the only front on which Ptolemaios’ forces were being thrown back. Antiochos of Makedonia was finally entering the fray. Heading the renewed League of Korinthos, a device resurrected to add a pan-Hellenic element to the transparently Makedonian enterprise, Antiochos had occupied Kriti, Lesbos, and the other islands in the Aigion, though Rhodos still held out with its navy. A descent upon Asia Mikra was clearly planned. Things were getting much worse before they got better.

And Pyrrhos was not having much fun either. At bay in southern Italia, he was dealing tactical defeats to every army the Romani sent south, but failing to land an annihilating blow to any individual one on the scale of Sybaris. He was rapidly becoming disillusioned with the Megale Hellenic enterprise, and even Sikilia was proving a poor investment, for several of the island poleis had risen in revolt, sponsored by the Qarthadastim, no doubt. Demetrios had been dispatched to rectify the situation, but it remained to be seen if he could handle the task. And now, to the east, Seleukos’ perfidious son Antiochos had invaded Epeiros and overrun much of Pyrrhos’ patrimony. In late 281 Pyrrhos embarked for Korkyra, thence to Epidamnos, which he fortified as a base from which to embark on his Epirote counterattack. Back in Megale Hellas, he left a lieutenant, one Hieron, to prosecute the war with the Romani and hold them away from the southern poleis as long as was possible.

Pyrrhos’ arrival back in Hellas was terrible news for Antiochos, for the Makedonian basileus was in command of the fleet, dueling with the Rhodioi in the Aigion. Only subordinates were available in Epeiros to deal with the infuriated adventurer-basileus, and subordinates would not do against a general of his caliber. Pyrrhos inflicted a frightful defeat upon a Makedonian army of 25,000 at Phylake in 280, reclaiming his patrimony and allowing him to contemplate a further attack. His armies were running low on money; the Epirote exchequer was hovering somewhere below nil. In order to secure cash with which to pay his mercenaries, drastic steps needed to be taken, and those drastic steps involved an attack on Makedonia, claiming the throne by way of his relationship – though somewhat distant – to Megas Alexandros himself. Antiochos had only just got back to Pella before Pyrrhos charged down from the Pindos, out for blood; he had just enough time to scrape together an army to meet and be defeated by the basileus of the Molossi at Tyrissa before being forced to flee elsewhere. Pyrrhos reached Pella and had himself crowned basileus in Makedonia. Once again, it seemed, his career had hit a high note, for his son Demetrios had success in Sikilia, and repelled a Qarthadastim invasion. Hieron limited Romani gains somewhat in Megale Hellas. There began to be real hope for carving out a new empire.

Thus it was clearly time for a new problem to emerge for Pyrrhos, namely the problem of an immense Gallic horde from the north in 279. Having already troubled Makedonia about a decade prior, these barbarians had their way smoothed by Pyrrhos’ ascension to power in Makedonia, which weakened the longtime barriers Antiochos and his father had maintained in Thraikia. Nearly a hundred thousand warriors moved south in a great expedition, led primarily by the nebulous warlord Brennus. Though the expedition split into several smaller groups, primarily due to logistical factors but also because of a wealth of targets, each one of the prongs was a mighty force in itself. Pyrrhos, who was reducing Antiochos’ loyalists in the difficult terrain of the Chalkidike, was caught unawares; he hastened back to Makedonia proper to contain the attack, but underestimated the speed of the Gallic march. Caught unawares at Ichnai, Pyrrhos managed to keep his outnumbered army fighting for five hours, but was eventually forced into a bend of the Axios, in which much of his army drowned. The Gallic warriors attempted to capture Pyrrhos himself, having surrounded him, but the redoubtable Epirote refused to go down without a fight, and slew seven barbarians before succumbing to the onslaught of the others, dying like a true ruler. The sequel to this disaster was a brilliant defense of Pella and Aigai by the remnants of Pyrrhos’ ruined army by his partisan Menoitias; this merely egged the Keltoi on further into Hellas, southwards into lands still held by Antiochos. This saw the Seleukid basileus at his finest. He cajoled troops from all corners of Hellas, even lands that the League of Korinthos didn’t hold, such as Sparte; all told, he gathered 20,000 united Hellenes to stand and fight at the pass of Thermopylai, emulating Leonidas of old. Brennus’ approach was cautious, for the ground was unknown, but he eventually attempted to force the pass to disastrous effect. That was only the first part of Antiochos’ plan; the second began when his general Menephilos, leading an allied Seleukid/Aitolian army of 15,000, approached the Keltoi from the rear, out of Thessalia. Caught like carrots in the pass that had been the graveyard of Xsayarsa’s armies, the Gallic barbarians, though they outnumbered their attackers, were slain by the thousands. Beset from all sides in a blinding snowstorm, it is said that they were slain to the last man.

Ptolemaios Keraunos likely didn’t care much about the death of his former comrade-in-arms; he was too busy roundly beating up on all of his own opponents. Kyrenaia was recovered in 280 after defeating Admetos soundly at Apollonia; later that year, he returned to Asia Mikra and smashed the army of Antigonos’ partisan, Neikophanes. Antigonos Gonatas reclaimed Babylon and Charax, and for his persistence Ptolemaios railed at him, for not laying down the purple and wearing the robes of a common man. The constant warfare was taking its toll, not only on the Ptolemaic finances and the Ptolemaic sanity, but also on the Ptolemaic armies. What had started out as a glittering, perfectly drilled professional force in the first part of the decade had become a downtrodden, tired, grizzled, and footsore group of rankers, artificially swollen by levies and mercenaries and tiring of the endless marching. Dissent was rising in the ranks, to which Ptolemaios was deaf. Instead, he made new plans, now to take advantage of the Keltoi invasion of Hellas; these plans were only slightly delayed by the news of the colossal victory at Thermopylai. But he would require a base somewhere on the Hellenic mainland, and such a base was to be found in Sparte, or so the failed claimant to the throne Kleonymos said. Ptolemaios, willing to try anything, agreed to send Kleonymos forth to open up a fifth column inside Sparte itself, while he himself would follow along with a grand expeditionary force of 40,000.

Landing at Gythion with scant resistance, the pharaoh and conqueror proceeded northwards along the valley of the Eurotas to Sparte itself, which had no walls and could easily be stormed, were it not for the army that the Spartan basileus, Areios himself – lately of Ptolemaic alliance, a fact which drew much righteous anger throughout Hellas – which stood in front of the city. Though Spartan arms had declined much since the victory of Plataia, much less Mantineia, the warriors who trained there were still the best soldiers of their kind in the world, hoplitai to match the old argyraspidai of Eumenes and Alexandros. Ptolemaios, fighting a pitched battle through the streets of the city, had his army badly mauled by these elites. But the old Spartan problem of numbers ran up against them once more, and they simply did not have enough men to match the Aigyptian army. Areios himself was slain in battle, along with most of the homoioi. Sparte was overrun, though it was at great cost. Afterward, Ptolemaios was overheard to say that if he had had to win many more battles against warriors such as the men of Sparte, he would have no army left. The following year, he pressed on, now drawing the wrath of the entire League of Korinthos. But Antiochos still had Keltoi to deal with in the north, and in greater numbers than the horde that had been smashed at Thermopylai; some of them were even making their way across the Hellespont to Asia Mikra, in the absence of either major Antigonid or Ptolemaic armies. So Ptolemaios was relatively unopposed in his march northward, seizing Argos with relatively little trouble. It was Korinthos that would prove to be his downfall, though. Having captured Sikyon, the Lagid pharaoh decided to press on to the great and ancient city of Korinthos, which still housed a Seleukid garrison at the Akrokorinthos; he was now shadowed by a ragtag army comprised of both members of the League and Seleukid royal troops, led by the Theban tyrannos Karpophoros. Breaking into the city by night, Ptolemaios was embroiled in an urban brawl, which intensified as Karpophoros fed his own troops into the meatgrinder. In the confusion, the pharaoh who had been called Thunderbolt was felled by a strike from above, as some unknown person hurled a roof tile at him. Knocked unconscious and later slain, whether by his own men or by the allied soldiers it is not known. But the great and powerful man, claimed – perhaps rightly – to be the last true diadochos, was dead. Without his guiding hand, the Ptolemaic state was adrift, spread out, and seemingly helpless before the vultures that circled around it.

It would not go down without a fight.

OOC:

I am quite fond of historical parallels.
 
Back
Top Bottom