I think you're glossing over the fact that her ancestry was in fact fraudulent?
In what sense was her ancestry "fraudulent"?
Yeah she was trying to force him to donate to charity (he said he would if she proved her ancestry) but everyone knew he would not actually do that and no one cares that he lied about it. So yeah, she shouldn't have played his game
That is certainly part of it. That Sartre quote about anti-Semites comes to mind:
“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
The facts of the matter are
always beside the point when dealing with accusations like the one Trump has made against Warren. Warren should have realized this of course and that speaks to
political incompetence on her part.
But there are real (as opposed to merely "optical") problems with how Warren has handled this.
1) In her defense she has emphasized that her ancestry played no role in her hiring and insisted that she was qualified, which implicitly concedes the conservative lie that affirmative action results in unqualified people being hired for positions simply because of their race. This is a particularly stupid line to take given that her record as one of the most distinguished law professors of the 20th century speaks for itself.
2) She actually did allow Harvard to tout her as a diversity hire. Harvard actually used her as an example of a Native American faculty member in the 1990s to deflect claims that its faculty was not diverse enough. I surely don't need to outline the ethical and political problems this poses.
At the very least she needs to apologize for this.
3) Releasing a DNA test in this fashion is little different from all the white people in history who have said "oh I can't be racist I'm 1/16th Native American". Her genes are basically unimportant to the question of whether Harvard's diversity goals were furthered by her hiring (they weren't).
4) As the Cherokee Nation has made clear Warren is undermining tribal identity and law by releasing a DNA test here.