Maybe when all the Trump judges retire we can have something like that.We need a whole new concept of judicial interpretation that sees for-profit "infotainment" as incompatible with a free press.
What do you mean, ‘info’?We need a whole new concept of judicial interpretation that sees for-profit "infotainment" as incompatible with a free press.
I know right? Its insane. Name an MSNBC or CNN anti Obama voice...hard right? Now name a Fox anti trump voice...holy horsehocky its easy!!!!I don't watch any of these networks so I can't argue the point but I just don't think this is really true.
I watch/listen to all three... It's not, and the claim that it is amounts to just another version of the insidious "both sides are bad" refrain.I don't watch any of these networks so I can't argue the point but I just don't think this is really true.
I have a different perspective on this. When I watch/listen to MSNBC, what I get from them are positions and information that are mostly accurate, with a heavily liberal spin and a little bit of blatantly bs pro-Democrat propaganda. From CNN I get positions and information that are mostly accurate with occasional unintentionally incorrect information that was presented in good faith. From the FOX, I get mostly unadulterated horse manure, outright lies and blatant pro Republican propaganda, even moreso that in prior years now that they are in the position of having to defend Trump.Now I'm going to say something absurdly controversial. They ARE more fair and balanced than MSNBC and CNN. Those two outlets are hyper aligned with establishment corporate Democrats and both quash antiwar voices and progressives even more than Fox.
I'd settle for just Kavanaugh and/or Gorsuch.If we ever get the votes in Congress we should get rid of all the judges Trump appointed.
My knee-jerk reaction to "those networks tolerated no anti-Obama talking heads" is "there were liberals generally opposed to Obama?"
I've very sporadically listened to Maddow (though it's been a couple years since the most recent) and my BS meter doesn't peg, melt down, then dissolve and eat through the floor and a decent chunk of the Earth's crust the way it does with Hannity or a couple of the other most egregious Fox heads, and in general I don't notice CNN and MSNBC blurring fact statements and opinion statements the way they do on Fox.
But I've not watched any enough to really compare, and I'll have to start taking a closer look at CNN and MSNBC now, though... *shudder* I'd really like to just stick with Politico and NationalReview.
it is quite good I must admitIt's dulce de leche, Sommerswerd. Your misspelling tells me that you are yet to taste the food of the gods.
I never watch news channels but I have both of these websites on bookmark as well and I have to say National Review has gone down since the Trump takeover of the GOP.
Are there any conservative-leaning sites that have not?
I prefer Tres Leches, but otherwise, I'm with you.It's dulce de leche, Sommerswerd. Your misspelling tells me that you are yet to taste the food of the gods.
No worries, seeing as how all those other federal judges have no powers whatsoever.I'd settle for just Kavanaugh and/or Gorsuch.
Are there any conservative-leaning sites that have not?
Eh maybe, except I'm not so sure that in the russiagate era that's exactly true. Maddow did a fear mongering segment about Russians turning off the heat in winter ffs. Replace "Russian" with "Iranian" in that story and you've got a Hannity segment. Two sides of the coin is all. Fox sounds crazier if you're on the other side but if you take a break from CNN/MSNBC for a while and get your news from any other source then come back, they sound pretty kooky too. Fox just, shockingly, has more dissenting voices.
M4All polls overwhelmingly amongst democrats. Why don't the "lefty" stations even give the policy a fair shake, let alone support it? Why do they push Klobuchar, Biden and Warren so hard? There's hardly any variety in the voices on their own side. Then when they do have a conservative on its some whackjob they can make fun of or a never trumper who feeds their overall narrative.
Fox is absolutely awful, no denying that. They just oddly enough have a wider variety of voices and opinions on their own side and even on the other. CNN/MSNBC are lockstep centrists.
I get what you're trying to say but it seems like you're unintentionally moving goalposts all over the place here. You can't have it both ways. Either you feel like MSNBC is the Democratic propaganda to match FOX's Republican propaganda, ie the "other side of the coin" or you feel like they are "centrists". If it is the former, then how can you then call them "lockstep centrists"? If they're on the "other side" then they cant be in the center. On the other hand, if it is the latter, they why are you calling them "lefty" and complaining that they don't sufficiently endorse the most liberal positions? Why would they be "lefty" if they're "lockstep centrists"?Eh maybe, except I'm not so sure that in the russiagate era that's exactly true. Maddow did a fear mongering segment about Russians turning off the heat in winter ffs. Replace "Russian" with "Iranian" in that story and you've got a Hannity segment. Two sides of the coin is all. Fox sounds crazier if you're on the other side but if you take a break from CNN/MSNBC for a while and get your news from any other source then come back, they sound pretty kooky too. Fox just, shockingly, has more dissenting voices.
M4All polls overwhelmingly amongst democrats. Why don't the "lefty" stations even give the policy a fair shake, let alone support it? Why do they push Klobuchar, Biden and Warren so hard? There's hardly any variety in the voices on their own side. Then when they do have a conservative on its some whackjob they can make fun of or a never trumper who feeds their overall narrative.Fox is absolutely awful, no denying that. They just oddly enough have a wider variety of voices and opinions on their own side and even on the other. CNN/MSNBC are lockstep centrists.