[RD] Daily Graphs and Charts

Status
Not open for further replies.
The US does not owe debt to those countries.

It owes debts to investing organisations that are notionally based in those countries.

Altough it some instances those organisations are state owned, in which case there is an equivalence of meaning.
 
Beer is proof God hates us and humanity is doomed. If God loved us, people would drink mead or cider instead of rat piss.
 
The US does not owe debt to those countries.

It owes debts to investing organisations that are notionally based in those countries.

Altough it some instances those organisations are state owned, in which case there is an equivalence of meaning.

According to https://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-3306124:

the US debt (22 trillion in total) falls into two categories:

1) US state owned (state agencies), roughly 6 trillion
and 2) "Public Debt. The public holds the rest of the national debt of $16.1 trillion. Foreign governments and investors hold 30% of it. Individuals, banks, and investors hold 15%. The Federal Reserve holds 12%. Mutual funds hold 9%. State and local governments own 5% The rest is held by pension funds, insurance companies, and Savings Bonds."
 
big-data-getting-bigger.jpg
 
The US does not owe debt to those countries.

It owes debts to investing organisations that are notionally based in those countries.

Altough it some instances those organisations are state owned, in which case there is an equivalence of meaning.

So, this is a separate chart than one showing what various central banks have purchased?
 
So... in summer it' so hot that the only game you can play is a relaxed game of baseball?
(besides an occassional soccer match)

Probably because no one cares about soccer in the US, so maybe they can trick some people to watch if nothing else is on.
That said, I never liked soccer either.
 
So... in summer it' so hot that the only game you can play is a relaxed game of baseball?
(besides an occassional soccer match)

So the reason the soccer games seem so "occasional" compared to the other sports is that soccer games usually happen on weekends, with occasional midweek fixtures thrown in here and there. Sometimes maybe a game on a monday, but it's rare. The reason for this is that the way soccer squads are put together and the amount of rest top players need pretty much means that if you want to play a midweek game every week (i.e. 2 games a week).. you gotta rotate all 23 of your players and rest them alternatively every game. This isn't great, because you want to see the same starters every game, ideally speaking. So what happens is most teams will play a game a week "or so". With some midweek games thrown in the mix out of necessity or for whatever reason. Believe it or not what you are looking at is a packed schedule. The most activity happens on weekends, which is why you're seeing the graph with spikes like that

Baseball on the other hand.. .. a team will play like 4 games a week. It's crazy. Hockey games happen all the time too, although less frequently. Basketball teams play a lot of games as well. Look at the top numbers so you can compare.

American Football is different, because from what I've been told players just can't handle all that violence. So you get like 16 games a season per team. Only 8 home games I believe.

I don't know why American football and basketball are winter sports here. I suppose in the case of basketball, all the teams play in arenas that are fully enclosed, with a roof and all. So you can play at any time of year. An odd choice to not give players the winter off instead of summer, but at least the arena setup makes sense. American football .. I have no idea why they don't play in the summer.

In the end this all works out well for MLS. It's a growing league and it would really suck to have to compete with so many other popular sports entertainment products. Competing with baseball only (for the most part) is easier because the demographics don't overlap as much. By that I mean.. Soccer in the U.S. is a sport that people in their 20s and 30s follow, whereas baseball tends to be a sport with older fans. But american football and basketball also attracts youth, a lot more than baseball does. So.. MLS competing with baseball in the summer is sort of ideal

There is also no way MLS could have a season that takes the summer off and runs through the winter. Toronto and Montreal, not to mention Chicago, Minnesota, and many other cities just couldn't support soccer games in the middle of the winter. It wouldn't work. We had huge problems in Toronto when our team had to compete in the Concacaf champions league in february 2 years ago. Our pitch got destroyed and the fans were freezing.
 
American football .. I have no idea why they don't play in the summer.

Probably historical reasons. I think American football was popularized by college teams early on. Since colleges don't operate full-time in the summer that leaves fall, winter, and spring. Also the idea of playing in open air stadiums with blizzard like conditions during playoff games has become romanticized. The term "Snow Bowl" has been applied to several memorable playoff games played in the winter.
 
Probably similar reasoning to football. College teams form before the professional leagues. School teams play during the fall/winter/spring. The NBA follows suit to capitalize on when the public has peak interest in basketball. The trend continues to this day.
 
What do the college american football & basketball players do in the summer? Here in Canada the best soccer college/uni players get drafted by professional football clubs that they can play at in between school years. From my understanding that sort of arrangement is not allowed in American leagues
 
I'm not totally sure. I know that high profile college teams have demanding in season schedules so they don't exactly have a full class schedule. In order to remain academically eligible they would need to take classes during the summer. They also hold practices during the school year even when they aren't in-season. So during the summer they probably have more practices and intra-team scrimmages.
 
This interests me. I have long wondered why people are so concerned about murders in Chicago. As a rate Chicago sits at about #10 among American cities. But it is a large city so produces a huge body count. Still Baltimore, New Orleans and Saint Louis are more deadly when measured as a rate. But look at this, it seems to indicate Chicago has a insanely high number of shooting. So in Chicago, you are quite likely to be shot, but less likely to die.

Or not. I cannot vouch for these numbers.

205292846.png



Sauce: https://www.citylab.com/equity/2019...s-gun-violence-racial-bias-crime-data/595528/
 
Last edited:
This interests me. I have long wondered why people are so concerned about murders in Chicago. As a rate Chicago sits at about #10 among American cities. But it is a large city so produces a huge body count. Still Baltimore, New Orleans and Saint Louis are more deadly when measured as a rate. But look at this, it seems to indicate Chicago has a insanely high number of shooting. So in Chicago, you are quite likely to be shot, but less likely to die.
Three possibilities off the top of my head.

- Shootings in Chicago are more likely to be small-calibre or otherwise less deadly guns.
- The number of shootings means that Chicago's hospitals have developed a lot of expertise treating gunshot wounds.
- Chicagoans are, just, absurdly bad shots.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom