Do you find the Babe Thread degrading?

PrinceOfLeigh said:
True in itself.

Quite frankly I'm getting worried about the number of people refering to "Well Endowed Girls" and "Male Babes" :dubious:

Perhaps the former is a language barrier, scroll up and you'll see my understanding of common American usage, at least.

To the latter, dunno.
 
IglooDude said:
Perhaps the former is a language barrier, scroll up and you'll see my understanding of common American usage, at least.

To the latter, dunno.
I read it, you may well be right. I forget the PC term which is used over here.
 
No, i do not, nor should anyone, since all the female bodies featured are flattering to their owners. There used to be a thread dedicated to hot male bodies, but it died due to lack of interest.
 
KaeptnOvi said:
at first I read "I like it and post pictures of myself in it" :mischief:

Odd thats how i read it first too!:lol: :goodjob:
 
I find its very existence abhorrent. Do you think I could get it closed by posting 1000 images of newborn infants?
 
{|}$~\ said:
I find its very existence abhorrent. Do you think I could get it closed by posting 1000 images of newborn infants?
Yes, and you'd probably get yourself arrested too. Ask Gary Glitter.
 
The babe in question is suppose to be an attractive adult female person. By posting pictures of infants, you may be misconstrued as a pedophile.
 
Whats wrong with pictures of beautiful women? These women are typically posing for the camera, meaning they are showing themselves off, and we have every right to look and admire. Thats what she wants, thats what we want.
 
PrinceOfLeigh said:
I read it, you may well be right. I forget the PC term which is used over here.

Well, for what it's worth, when I personally refer to a well-endowed female, you may safely assume that I'm referring to the mommybagular region, not any stuff which may or may not be under her skirt. ;)
 
PrinceOfLeigh said:
True in itself.

Quite frankly I'm getting worried about the number of people refering to "Well Endowed Girls" and "Male Babes" :dubious:
It appears to be the Americans that use these terms. The English equivalents to those terms would be "voluptuous girls" and "gorgeous men". The terms are understandable to me, but are like you said, dubious.
 
IglooDude said:
Well, for what it's worth, when I personally refer to a well-endowed female, you may safely assume that I'm referring to the mommybagular region, not any stuff which may or may not be under her skirt. ;)
Hopefully nothing, ( ;) ), but generally knicker/underwear.
 
Simon Darkshade said:
Opinions are like servants: everyone has them, but you don't want them coming in and talking to your guests in the drawing room.

Nice ;)

However those opinnion-servants have already invited their own friends, in their own dining-rooms, which is why you cannot keep track of their full metamorphosis from day to day.
 
Servants do not have dining rooms; they eat cold scraps in the kitchen. Furthermore, they are not permitted to have friends during their hours of work, which comprise the time that they are awake.

If yours are giving you any cheek, I suggest a combination of a damn good thrashing with a rataan cane, castration, branding and setting the dogs on 'em. That should fix it.
 
I think it looks like soft-core pornography. But I figured my popping in just to say that wouldn't really do much, so I just left that thread alone.

Simon, I think I might be interested in joining your campaign. :mischief:
 
You are a bit old for a premium pageboy membership, but I'm sure we could squeeze you in for an associate role, prior to adult membership, which involves a nice certificate and a big blue badge. With stars on it.
 
Simon Darkshade said:
No, and this topic has been raised previously. If I do not like a thread, I do not read it.

By that logic, we should allow fascists, racists, and homophobes to post to their hearts content, and the only thing that should be done is not reading it.
 
Back
Top Bottom