Election 2024 Part III: Out with the old!

Who do you think will win in November?


  • Total voters
    101
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, I agree. Thats what "So what?" was supposed to mean. I'm acknowledging that facts are of limited utility against Trump.

But so what? Its not an easy problem to work.
Agreed

There's no such thing as Latin Europe, except to point out Latin is a dead language, and not what people mean when they're talking about "Latino". Or "Hispanic", which is different again (also, as I'm very sure you know, Portugal doesn't speak Spanish).
You're embarrassing yourself.
 
You're embarrassing yourself.
Just replying in kind. Good to see that you too can choose to engage in browbeating when it suits you. Definitely makes your complaining about "the wokes" seem fair and level-headed.

If you want an example of "embarrassing yourself", it's Sarin complaining about this:
blue-haired activism
Because that is a very specific hyper-online signifier of being a part of the "culture war", having its popular roots (but not actual roots - started a few years before) in GamerGate (which is election-relevant in a small way given how the conservative war on anything remotely progressive has been amplified by far and alt-right figures throwing themselves into US politics).

Y'all say that leftists are terminally online, need to go outside, etc. This phrase here is from the other said of that "terminally online" thing. But weirdly, zero pushback to it. It's almost as though your own personal politics affects what you see as needing calling out, vs. what goes unchallenged.

Or you don't actually have the in-depth knowledge about the things you're talking about. Who's to know what's more likely.
 
Last edited:
I'm not browbeating, just shocked at the doubling and tripling down on ignorance.
I was enjoying a short tangent with Ordnael when you inserted yourself to mock me publicly in the thread. Don't really know what else to call it, especially given the amount of tangents about mean behaviour from leftists forcing people to vote for Trump. I certainly wouldn't go around throwing stones about ignorance. The whole point of a discussion is to attack the argument, not the person.

I'm just amused at the hypocrisy. How can a person in favour of feelings-based self-identification be disputing someone else's identification as Latino?
You're right, these things you're saying are definitely the same thing and you absolutely know what you're talking about.
 
I'm just amused at the hypocrisy. How can a person in favour of feelings-based self-identification be disputing someone else's identification as Latino?
Saying Spaniards and Portuguese aren't Latin is like saying English aren't Anglos, only white Americans can be, like WTH.

He's likely seen the word used so much in the context of Latin America (America that was colonized by Latin people) he's forgotten what it even means.

Whatever we all make mistakes, it's ok to just admit it.
 
Saying Spaniards and Portuguese aren't Latin is like saying English aren't Anglos, only white Americans can be, like WTH.

He's likely seen the word used so much in the context of Latin America (America that was colonized by Latin people) he's forgotten what it even means.

Whatever we all make mistakes, it's ok to just admit it.
This is a fun tangent. Please go look up with what Latino and Hispanic mean for their respective demographics and get back to me.

I've made such an obvious mistake you feel it's self-evident, so this should be easy.
 
Last edited:
Magicking up theories about melanin or "latin descendents" that have nothing to do with what anyone was talking about seems like the quintessential example of looking for something to complain about, in a US election thread.

That can't be right. I was told only leftists pursued made-up grievances to make others feel bad ;) You have fun with your wild theories.
Looking for something to complain about humm...you mean like this?
I didn't realise Elon was the one catching the rocket.
I've got you number buddy...you can't stand people that don't share all your world views to the letter, moderates be damned!:scan:
 
I've got you number buddy...you can't stand people that don't share all your world views to the letter, moderates be damned!:scan:
I mean, good job linking to a completely different post I made in a different thread nearly a month ago. That's . . . definitely normal behaviour.

Anyhow, yes, as I said, I was told only leftists pursued made-up grievances. I am a leftist. This uh, this isn't difficult :D

-----------------------

Let's try and get back to something resembling reality, shall we? Once again, it looks like "identity politics" isn't to blame.
1731083632788.png
 
So you're confirming it. That's important information. I wonder if the Democrats strategists are gathering this and deciding how to act on it going forward.
Well, you see, they simultaneously pity Latin Americans for being in some God-forsaken place in notAmerica and left to theirown primitive devices and yet they expect them to magically become enlightened just by crossing the border into the Promised Land. It's a bit patronising, to be honest, as explained, in part, by choxorn:
Legitimately, I don't think I've ever seen anyone insisting that you absolutely have to use Latinx instead of Latino/Latina/Latin American, or if I have, it's been much less than the number of people saying not to use it because it looks and sounds dumb in Spanish and honestly less than the number of people I've seen suggest "Latine" as a gender-neutral alternative that follows Spanish grammar rules better. Like, I have met people who use the Latinx or other <group>-x identifiers to refer to themselves or others, but the number of people who use the identifier at all (and certainly the number of people who'd insist it's the only politically correct and good identifier) is way fewer than some of y'all are acting like it is. It's like the trans people in sports thing where it's somehow become a big conservative boogeyman that pretends something is much larger than it really is.

I will, admittedly, concede that some of the progressive language that puts random x's everywhere does in fact look and sound kinda dumb, but that kind of thing isn't going to make me abandon all of my political persuasions and vote right-wing just because some college activists can be a little cringy and annoying at times.
 
I mean, good job linking to a completely different post I made in a different thread nearly a month ago. That's . . . definitely normal behaviour.

Anyhow, yes, as I said, I was told only leftists pursued made-up grievances. I am a leftist. This uh, this isn't difficult :D

Made up grievances huh!?...I am not latino anymore because I am not a Mexican descended from a Spaniard!
Just like the other woman was taught in school that Cleopatra was black I was taught that my people are descendent from latinos!

If it's not enough to ascertain my identity like this, let me use another method more coherent with your views and... just like some folks choose identify themselves differently enough to warrant access to women only safe spaces while keeping their original privates pristine then I choose to identify as latino, there...better? Or am I less human than the other folks that choose their identity.
 
Isn't "latin american" using "latin" as the adjective for the type of "american", instead of it meaning (rather bizarrely) "latin male, american"?
Too bad "americana" never was used to mean "female american" (it does in Greek, btw; here -say- Jennifer Lopez is a latinoamericana).

There's also the anodyne option to use the periphrasis "american latins and latinas" or "american latinas and latins". The "american" in front can be dropped in some cases, as it is inferred in context.
 
Last edited:
If it's not enough to ascertain my identity like this, let me use another method more coherent with your views and... just like some folks choose identify themselves differently enough to warrant access to women only safe spaces while keeping their original privates pristine then I choose to identify as latino, there...better? Or am I less human than the other folks that choose their identity.
Like I said, have fun with your theories. You're not really helping the folks in the thread who are trying to blame "the left" for making everything about "woke politics", as you've tried to shoehorn in a) my criticism of Musk from another thread and b) your moaning about trans rights. Kinda seems like you're trying to make everything about identity politics despite my attempts to get back to the topic.

Isn't "latin american" using "latin" as the adjective for the type of "american", instead of it meaning (rather bizarrely) "latin male, american"?
Latino (from Latin American) does indeed describe a type of (Latin) American with a specific heritage, yes. Now, if Ordnael was from Brazil, and not Portugal, this would be relevant. And if he is from Brazil, then I'm wrong and pre-emptively apologise. But that doesn't seem to be the case.

The context is also US politics wrt. the election, where these demographics are being labelled in the context of voter demographics, which means "whatever Ordnael thinks" doesn't actually apply, nomatter how clever Sarin thinks he's being. Heck, whatever I think doesn't apply. All we can do is provide sources relevant to the election (and when appropriate, definitions from Google to appease whatever tedious semantics people want to attack other posters over), and hope for the best.

If it's fun for you, you do it.
You're the one telling me I'm wrong, calling out my apparent embarrassment, and so on. It's on you buddy. If you choose not to, own that choice.
 
My take is that Democrats shouldn't change hardly any of their stances on social issues. But they should emphasize them less over economic issues. The vast majority of economists said the economy would do better under Harris than Trump, but I didn't hear it talked about much. Democrats should also not be afraid to call out Republicans when they vote down things like minimum wage increases or infrastructure spending.
 
My take is that Democrats shouldn't change hardly any of their stances on social issues. But they should emphasize them less over economic issues. The vast majority of economists said the economy would do better under Harris than Trump, but I didn't hear it talked about much. Democrats should also not be afraid to call out Republicans when they vote down things like minimum wage increases or infrastructure spending.
Yeah this is what is interesting about the analysis in my post further up the page. They abandoned the approach that was helping them on the economic front, allegedly at the urging of Harris' own brother-in-law. Kinda wild, really.

(as well as sending Clinton to Michigan, as I understand it)
 
Nah, it didn't work for the Remain campaign during the Brexit vote. The right appeals to emotions and keeps winning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom