He avoided prison which is all he cared about. He's got the senate, house and supreme court. Let's see if he actually does anything or if he just memes for two years then plays victim again when the Dems take one of them back in 2026.
His process and career path aren't entirely dissimilar to Trump.
Oh, I know, but what I said is that they'll continue trying to find Trumps.
There's a perception that many illegal aliens don't really work, have bogus asylum claims, commit an inordinate amount of crimes, and survive off of taxpayer-funded welfare alone (including primary education). Now I don't know how true this is, as stats are hard to come by at the federal level. But I think people's beef are mostly with a lack of fairness and clarity in the entire system. Namely, they simply don't believe the border patrol is doing a very good job. No matter how many illegal aliens there might ever be. And I can't say I disagree; that's sort-of a primary job of having an independent country.*
If Ron Desantis was elected president I doubt very much the level of fearmongering going on here would not be all that different in terms of degree; in terms of substance maybe yes. There's been a perception since the Barack Obama years that individuals such as him naturally belong within the presidency and we aren't allowed to have any market corrections when things inevitably do go sour...I was quite young at the time but I don't remember any feeling that Bill Clinton was some natural fit for the White House in the 1990s and the very symbol of some political "movement"; he was merely a charismatic leader and comparatively more moderate...
We do! Right here on this forum!
I don't know how true this is for america. But it has always been my impression, based largely on opinions here in Europe, that the broad masses of the working class do in fact NOT want their country to be there to care for and accept anyone and everyone in the world that shows up. In fact, they want the absolute opposite. They want their country to look after them, the citizens. And that the bulk of anti migration sentiment comes in no small part from the fact that when people see their country spending their tax money on helping foreigners as opposed to them they feel betrayed. Much in the same way a hungry child might feel betrayed if its mother was handing candy out to strangers but leaving none for them.
"Conversation and understanding is the key, stop scolding others! I'm going to leave now to avoid any conversation or understanding."
It's the same in the US. This country has a long history of anti-immigrant laws and attitudes. The Ellis Island image people have in their heads only lasted like 30ish (1880s-WW1) years then it spurred some extreme backlash that almost totally blocked immigration during even apocalyptic events like WWII. Wouldn't be until LBJ in the 60's that we have more or less what we have today.
Good to see you find genocide funny.Watching a lot of the responses to the election results is like watching cats and the red dots.
(hilarious)
<insert smartass comment about 'you're gonna need a bigger mop'>
I would suggest that the lefties try just talking to others who don't believe what they do.
Talk with I should say, there's been enough 'talking to'.
I'm outta this thread so final comment:
"I disagree vehemently with everything you said, but will defend to the death, your right to say it."
You may notice a severe lack of Rigged! accusations and a process of acceptation going on. There's no guy pointing a red dot at the Capitol.
Yes, precisely. The solution is for the country to care for its own people and remove their problems. Even if it means reducing or completely eliminating money wasted on other things. What ever those other things or people may be. Which is precisely what the people want, what every politician ever promises and what nobody ever does because doing so would erode the base of people they can rely to vote for them.
So many questions. Which problems do you mean when you say: their problems? Don't different people have different problems? Don't those problems require conflicting solutions?
That's what elections are for.
