• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.

Forum migrated to xenforo!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tapatalk is an add-on, that hasn't been installed for xenforo. Given that the main benefit of tapatalk is to make the site mobile friendly, and given that xenforo ticks that box, I doubt tapatalk will be installed again. Tapatalk has a few security problems (well, they used to have, haven't checked in a while).
That may be the case about the mobility, but personally, I'm not finding the new site very easy to use on my phone. Using a browser for regular activity beyond search is never fun in my experience. I'm feeling disheartened by this change. I've come here quite often for a long time now and have been a regular in this community. Now, I feel like I have woken up to find that everything about my home town has changed. There was no warning... No time to prepare. I went to bed living in Baltimore and woke up living in Timbuktu. I'm not saying that one is better, just that they are so different that the change is impactful.

I'm very... Disappointed!
 
The prefixes seem to be messed up partially; there are quite a few 'empty' ones. (Not only for civ4 as shown in the image below)

EDIT:
Ahk6ZWT.png


(wait, i can't insert images from imgur? I bet I'm doing something wrong)
EDIT3: Seems like I need to copy paste the BB-code version from imgur into the BB-code editor in my post, and that using the 'insert image' with the normal link doesn't work?


EDIT2: and my signature is messed up too due to the new smileys :c. But those were already going to be fixed (as in, reverted to the old ones) from my understanding
 
Last edited:
Also, is there any way to view 'your subscriptions' as on the old forum. I can't seem to find the option...
 
Using this new forum software, is there a way to search through posts via user in a particular thread? I found that function extremely useful.
 
You are free to simply not use it.
That's completely missing the point. The problem is not me using it or not, the problem that the very existence of such a system pollute discussions with the shadow of popularity contest.
 
With all the praise for the changes that we see in this thread, I'd just like to join the choir and add that I'm only happy with changes when I have control over them myself! :p

This is gonna take some time getting used to, but I'm sure it will turn out well. I'll have to wait with giving criticism and suggestions for improvements though, since right now stuff is new and I hate it all...
 
That can't be right, as I can still edit my posts from over an hour ago.

Regards
Then maybe it's because I have been... rewarded... with an infraction a while ago?

In any case it should be changed, as it severely impacts on people's ability to for example update their mod threads.
 
It's great to see the site move to a more modern technological foundation, especially with the expected traffic from the upcoming Civ6 release. That shows a lot of foresight.

However, I think that this migration could have communicated better in advance. Did I miss an announcement? Suddenly seeing the forum down for a couple of days without explanation wasn't very reassuring.

More importantly though, I have to say that the look and feel of the new forum is terrible right now. In my opinion, vbulletin was hard to beat in that regard. I hope a different forum theme can address most of these problems, and I also hope this is prioritised over other issues. To be a little more concrete:
* in general everything is light grey and there is little separation between elements on a given page, e.g. in threads posts are barely separated from each other, signatures are barely separated from posts, thread tools/links appear right as part of the post. It makes the whole board look very messy and hard to look at.
* many elements are plain ugly: smilies, color coding in the thread list, stuff like those speech bubbles next to threads or OP avatars next to threads, not to mention the pointless box around the avatar next to posts. All of these are minor and inconsequential on their own and might not seem worth disagreeing about, but they are all pointless and distracting and make the forum harder to navigate.
* why is it that an apparently more modern forum uses plain HTML elements for everything? Apparently every control element is a link or a checkbox now, even vbulletin was better than that.
* gloss, gradients and drop shadows are not more modern, only distracting.

I don't want to sound to critical because most of these seem like issues that could be addressed with better themes. Right now, most of the changes introduced on the user interface end make the forum hard to navigate and interact with, and definitely not a place to spend my time on if I don't have to. Another problem is that old CFC had a very distinctive feel to it, while this currently looks like something I could launch on forumotion in thirty minutes (not to disparage the work you did on the backend, just saying that the current appearance does not communicate that this is a grown and important community).

Additionally, I don't like the way this was used to dis- and enable controversial features through the back door. Likes may be just a configuration box to check on zenforo but that doesn't mean they needed to be added. More importantly, I disagree with the decision to just drop tapatalk support. Zenforo may be web optimised and not look like a mess in mobile browsers anymore, but that doesn't mean that interacting with it through browser is comparable to tapatalk. If you have to tap hyperlinks on a mobile browser page to navigate pages or quote people etc. it's not exactly comfortable to use. There is a reason tapatalk is the de facto standard for forums on mobile.
 
That's completely missing the point. The problem is not me using it or not, the problem that the very existence of such a system pollute discussions with the shadow of popularity contest.

It honestly just seems like the only people making it a popularity contest are the people shouting up and down that it's a popularity contest. In over a decade of being on forums I've never seen likes used to convey or otherwise imply popularity, only agreement or appreciation.
 
1) I prefer a non-serufe font and not a font like here which is hard to read

2) I don't like Flash

so it is less user friendly

3) error:
http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=15875
there should come
Civ 5 - Civilization Fanatics' Forums - Downloads Database - [TSL] Yet (not) Another Earth Maps Pack v.22
I get
CivFanatics Forums - Error

The requested page could not be found.
 
Last edited:
* why is it that an apparently more modern forum uses plain HTML elements for everything? Apparently every control element is a link or a checkbox now, even vbulletin was better than that.
* gloss, gradients and drop shadows are not more modern, only distracting.
Regular links can be made to look really good and button-like with CSS, so it basically just makes it easier to make new themes.

This current look really needs to be updated though.

More importantly, I disagree with the decision to just drop tapatalk support. Zenforo may be web optimised and not look like a mess in mobile browsers anymore, but that doesn't mean that interacting with it through browser is comparable to tapatalk. If you have to tap hyperlinks on a mobile browser page to navigate pages or quote people etc. it's not exactly comfortable to use. There is a reason tapatalk is the de facto standard for forums on mobile.
ainwood already said that tapatalk takes up to much resources, so if the forum already works on web (I haven't tried myself) then it would be better not to install it.
 
I don't have flash installed, don't see any problems.

Yes, it's the little blue button to the left of the thread title.

God, that's really not obvious.


I find the fonts not very...eye friendly, especially in the quoted text.

Is there no multi-quote feature anymore?

The "search all threads by user X" on the profile page doesn't seem to be working.
 
Is there no multi-quote feature anymore?

There is albeit it's more unwieldy than vBulletin's. You can click 'Reply' on multiple posts and it'll dynamically add it to the quick reply form down at the bottom.
 
Regular links can be made to look really good and button-like with CSS, so it basically just makes it easier to make new themes.

This current look really needs to be updated though.

ainwood already said that tapatalk takes up to much resources, so if the forum already works on web (I haven't tried myself) then it would be better not to install it.
I can't speak to the back end of forum management. However, I can say that myself, as a user, I have not had any problems with the stored of accessing the forums from my computer. However, just a few hours of having to use a browser on my phone to browse and post since this update has been troubling at the least. I've already accidentally clicked ads due to slow loading of forums several times. That is a problem in and of itself. And browsing, viewing and even paying has been less than optimal to put it nicely.
 
There is albeit it's more unwieldy than vBulletin's. You can click 'Reply' on multiple posts and it'll dynamically add it to the quick reply form down at the bottom.

Ah, thanks :).

2) I don't like Flash.

Just checked a bit around through all the stuff, and it seems there's a flash based file uploader (that#s the only thing I see), but you can disable it in your profile.


Unrelated: I don't see a way to report a post...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom