Is Donald Trump Done for?

Thanks for the reply, understand the your reposting, but on the Washington Post page it sez what you and I quoted and it doesn't make sense.

That said, am not subscribed to WP so am only reading the short intro.

In the room, along with the Yazidi woman, there was a holocaust survivor, a Tibetan, and a Rohingya. They were all there as representative spokespeople for refugees. And your Dingbat Dear Leader disrespected them to a point where frankly had someone of moral integrity representing the US been in the room the fat orange clown would have been on the wrong end of a well deserved beat down.
 
Alzheimer's or Narcissism ?

In Another About-Face, Trump Refuses to Condemn ‘Send Her Back’ Chant
WASHINGTON — President Trump on Friday demonstrated the limited influence of allies or advisers who try to steer him away from pre-election racial and cultural fights. He walked back his disavowal of a racially loaded chant at a campaign rally less than 24 hours after making it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/19/us/politics/trump-omar-disavowel.html?action=click&module=Top Stories&pgtype=Homepage
 
It's not even narcissism, it's just indifference.
 
Alzheimer's or Narcissism ?
Neither. It's just race baiting at this point. He tried to weather the storm of bad coverage and when it wouldn't go away he just leaned into it to rally his base who is mostly fine with this being a racist attack on certain people of color.
 
I never knew that women, storm denials /s
I wonder how many Evangelicals would have voted for Trump anyways ? Given they way they all ate up Trumps obvious lies. Probably not but it would have affected the swing voters and torn away the fig leaf of credibility Trump had in regards to hes marriage
The irony is that Trump as President has made denials of extra marital affair(s) which is what Clinton was impeached over.

Trump knew about efforts to quash stories of alleged affairs, court records show

NEW YORK — Court records released Thursday show Donald Trump was aware of efforts to keep a porn star and a Playboy centerfold silent in the days leading up to the 2016 election.

But despite Trump’s knowledge of those efforts— and the involvement of several others in his orbit — federal prosecutors in New York decided not to file any additional charges in their investigation of the illegal hush money payments made to silence both women who say they had sex with Trump before he was president, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Court records released Thursday offered new details about the role Trump played in his campaign’s frenetic efforts to quash stories about the alleged affairs with porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal.
Trump initially insisted he was unaware of the hush money payments that his former attorney, Michael Cohen, orchestrated to Daniels and McDougal, who claimed they had affairs with Trump. Trump denies the allegations.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politi...stories-of-alleged-affairs-court-records-show
 
Last edited:
That abradley and the gop plus their base will continue to defend a man who has shown himself to be a racist, a bigot, a misogynist, a credibly accused rapist and sexual harrasser, a man with close ties to a pedophile network and a nativist, should be held against them and they should be reminded of it everyday.

Shame these people, ridicule them and ostracize them because they do not care about others or America but only of themselves.

Trump supporters and the gop are complicit and should not be given the benefit of the doubt at this point.

It is no longer enough to merely disagree with them, they should be shunned and made to feel the same way they make the rest of us feel.

And if that's a little bit too divisive for you then with due respect I ask that you consider what he is doing to this countries stability, as he is weakening it.
 
Last edited:
I do wonder how much his base truly doesn't know all the things Trump has done thanks to Fox & Friends running defense versus how many know but don't care. And I would count willful ignorance here as 'not knowing'.
 
The red state relatives that I have will always make excuses by just regurgitating what they hear on fox.
 
Sure, that's almost a given. I am curious as to whether or not they know these things in the first place? I guess so if they already have canned responses.
 
Most of them have really never thought for themselves due to a lack of ability in those realms or probably more, a lack of interest.
 
Most of them have really never thought for themselves due to a lack of ability in those realms or probably more, a lack of interest.

Idk my family members are almost all universally conservative and most of them are decently well read on the topics at hand. They just choose to only read reinforcing pieces. Hell there is a whole publishing house now based on oh pushing right wing propaganda. The interest in politics is there just not any interest in challenging their own notions.
 
I do wonder how much his base truly doesn't know all the things Trump has done thanks to Fox & Friends running defense versus how many know but don't care. And I would count willful ignorance here as 'not knowing'.

The other half of it is that many liberals don't know the counter talking points. Like, there will be a story that seems to be crushing, but the people forwarding the story don't know why the people who don't believe it don't believe it
 
The other half of it is that many liberals don't know the counter talking points. Like, there will be a story that seems to be crushing, but the people forwarding the story don't know why the people who don't believe it don't believe it
So I don't watch MSNBC but I do believe @Berzerker whenever he says that they don't invite on very conservatives or at least less than the number of progressives that Fox invites on. Bill Maher frequently chastises politicians that come on his show for not putting themselves and their ideas onto Fox and conservative radio more frequently, though this doesn't really square with Berzerker's claims. I don't watch either so I can't be sure which is true.
 
I can't remember which thread it was in but @Commodore and I were discussing media echo chambers with a focus primarily on social media. I pointed out that even traditional media is becoming an echo chamber but I didn't have any good examples of this. Well, here's a couple -

Buttigieg recorded an interview with a host of a country music station only to have the interview buried and not-aired by the parent company in effort to keep a liberal from reaching their audience.

Similarly, there is a conservative media company that has gobbled up a frightening share of local TV stations and it has forced those TV stations to air extremely misleading, extremely pro-GOP 'service announcements' all across the country. They currently reach 42% of households and if their buy-outs are allowed to continue, will soon reach 75% of the country. These editorial pieces are often divorced from reality and are required to be recorded and aired by local news staff in many media markets.

There used to be laws against this kind of consolidation and manipulation of the media but they have been systematically undermined by the monied class to support their own interests and we're all worse off for it.
 
Last edited:
He and Kissinger specifically sabotaged LBJ's peace talks to be able to use it to make him lose the election and then take power for themselves. Without their intervention the Viet Nam war would have been over (for the US, and perhaps even with South Viet Nam remaining free) several years and tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of casualties earlier.

Yup, Nixon turned traitor in 1968 to win the Presidency. :mad:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Chennault#Vietnam_and_"The_Chennault_Affair"
Spoiler :
Vietnam and "The Chennault Affair"
Recorded in Nixon, A Life, by Jonathan Aitken, notes of Patrick Hillings, the former congressman accompanying the candidate's 1967 trip to Taipei, Nixon interjected just after an unexpected encounter with Mrs. Chennault, "Get her away from me, Hillings; she's a chatterbox."

On 31 March 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson announced that he was withdrawing from the 1968 presidential election, announced a partial halt to the bombing of North Vietnam and stated his willingness to open peace talks with North Vietnam on ending the war.[35] After much haggling about where to hold the peace talks, talks finally began in Paris in May 1968 with W. Averell Harriman heading the American delegation and Xuân Thủy the North Vietnamese delegation.[36]

In the 1968 election, Chennault served as the chairwoman of the Republican Women for Nixon Committee.[37] According to records of President Lyndon B. Johnson's secret monitoring of South Vietnamese officials and his political foes, Anna Chennault played a crucial role on behalf of the Nixon campaign[38][39] which sought to block a peace treaty in what one long-term Washington insider called "activities ... beyond the bounds of justifiable political combat."[40] She arranged the contact with South Vietnamese Ambassador Bùi Diễm whom Richard Nixon met in secret in July 1968 in New York.[41]

On 12 July 1968, at the Hotel Pierre in New York, Chennault introduced Bùi Diễm, the South Vietnamese ambassador to the United States, to Nixon.[42] Unknown to Diễm, he was followed secretly by the CIA who kept him under surveillance while the National Security Agency (NSA), which had broken the South Vietnamese diplomatic codes, read all of the messages going back and forth from the South Vietnamese embassy in Washington.[43]

Henry Kissinger, the Harvard professor of political science had started his career as an unofficial diplomat involved in the peace efforts to end the Vietnam war in June 1967 when he met in Paris Herbert Marcovich, a French biologist who told him that a friend of his, Raymond Aubrac, was a friend of Ho Chi Minh.[44] Kissinger contacted Harriman, the Ambassador-at-Large with a mandate to end the Vietnam war.[45] Marcovich and Aubrac agreed to fly to Hanoi to meet Ho, and to convey his messages to Kissinger who was to pass them on to Harriman.[46] Through nothing came of Operation Pennsylvania as Ho stated the United States had to "unconditionally" stop bombing North Vietnam as the precondition for peace talks, a demand that Johnson rejected, it established Kissinger as someone who was interested in making peace in Vietnam.[47] Kissinger had served as the principal foreign policy adviser for the Republican Governor of New York, Nelson Rockefeller, during his three failed bids to win the Republican nomination in the elections of 1960, 1964 and 1968. In the 1968 Republican primaries, Kissinger had expressed considerable contempt for Nixon, whom he wrote in July 1968 was "the most dangerous, of all the men running, to have as president".[48] After Rockefeller lost to Nixon, Kissinger switched camps, telling Nixon's campaign manager, John N. Mitchell that he had changed his mind about Nixon.[49] As Kissinger was a close associate of Rockefeller with a history of denigrating Nixon, Mitchell was very cool to Kissinger. In an attempt to ingratiate himself with Nixon, Kissinger offered to serve as a spy, saying that Harriman trusted him and he could keep Nixon informed about the state of the Paris peace talks.[50]

On 17 September 1968, Kissinger contacted Harriman.[51] Kissinger falsely portrayed himself to Harriman as having broken with the Republicans, writing a letter that began with: "My dear Averell, I am through with Republican politics. The party is hopeless and unfit to govern".[52] Kissinger visited Harriman in Paris to offer his expertise and advice, and through talking with his staff learned that the peace talks were going well.[53] Upon returning to the United States from France, Kissinger contacted Richard V. Allen, another Nixon adviser, to tell him that Harriman was making progress in Paris.[54] Kissinger contacted Allen via a pay phone in an attempt to avoid FBI wiretapping.[55]

The Democratic candidate for president in 1968, Vice President Hubert Humphrey, was behind in the polls because of the riots at the Democratic Convention in Chicago in August, but on 30 September 1968, he broke with Johnson by stating his willingness if elected president to stop all bombing of North Vietnam as the price of peace.[56] Afterwards, Humphrey started to rise in the polls, and by late October 1968, the election was close.[57] In October 1968, Humphrey was leading 44% to Nixon's 43% of the vote, a very narrow lead, but a lead nonetheless.[58] In October 1968, the American delegation in Paris led by W. Averell Harriman reported to Washington that the peace talks with Thủy were going well and he believed a peace agreement was possible before the election.[59] On 12 October 1968 Kissinger reported to Allen that Harriman had "broken open the champagne" because he believed that he was very close to a peace deal.[60] In a conversation that was secretly recorded by the FBI, Allen and Mitchell both agreed that Kissinger would have to be rewarded with a senior post if Nixon won the election as a reward.[61] Allen suggested that national security adviser might be suitable for Kissinger.[62] A peace deal might have turned the election in favor of Humphrey. The South Vietnamese President Nguyễn Văn Thiệu did not want the Paris peace talks to be successful as he feared an American withdrawal would be the end of his regime. Throughout October, Thiệu kept demanding conditions that he knew the North Vietnamese would reject in attempts to sabotage the peace talks, leading to intense pressure from the Johnson administration on him to cease his intransigence.[63]

On 23 October 1968, Diễm cabled President Nguyễn Văn Thiệu saying he was in close contact with Chennault and that: "Many Republican friends have contacted me and encouraged us to stand firm. They were alarmed by press reports to the effect that you have already softened your position".[64] In another message from Chennault, Diễm reported to Thiệu that she wanted him to object to the American offer to cease bombing North Vietnam altogether, saying this would be deal-breaker at the Paris peace talks.[65] The messages that Thiệu received from Chennault to the effect that Nixon, if elected, would bargain for a better peace deal than Humphrey, encouraged him in his intransigence.[66] According to notes of Nixon's aide, Robert Haldeman, his orders were: "Keep Anna Chennault working on SVN [South Vietnam]"..[67] Both the CIA and the FBI had tapped Chennault's phone and were recording her conversations with Diễm.[68] Besides for the NSA intercepting the South Vietnamese diplomatic cables, the CIA had also bugged Thiệu's office, and as a result knew that Cheannult's messages were indeed encouraging Thiệu to make unreasonable demands at the Paris peace talks.[69] Johnson phoned Nixon to tell him that he knew very well what he was doing and to stay away from Chennault.[70] Johnson's call convinced Nixon that the FBI had bugged his phone as Johnson seemed very well informed about all of the details of the "Chennault affair".[71] In fact, Chennault was under FBI surveillance.[72] One FBI report stated: "Anna Chenault contacted Vietnam Ambassador Bùi Diễm and advised him that she received a message from her boss...which her boss wanted her to give personally to the ambassador. She said the message was that, 'Hold on. We are gonna win...Please tell your boss to hold on".[73]

It was through Chennault's intercession[74][75] that Republicans advised Saigon to refuse participation in the talks, promising a better deal once elected.[76][77][78] Records of FBI wiretaps show that Chennault phoned Bùi Diễm on November 2 with the message "hold on, we are gonna win."[79][80] Before the elections President Johnson "suspected (…) Richard Nixon, of political sabotage[81] that he called treason".[82]

On January 2, 2017, The New York Times reported that historian John A. Farrell, a biographer of Nixon, had found a memo written by H.R. Bob Haldeman that confirmed that Nixon himself had authorized "throwing a monkey wrench" into Johnson's peace negotiations.[2] Objections from President Thiệu sabotaged the peace talks in Paris.[83] On 30 October 1968, Thiệu announced flatly that South Vietnam was withdrawing from the peace talks in Paris.[84] Thiệu's reasons for withdrawing from the talks were supposedly due to the seating arrangements, claiming that it was unacceptable to him that the Viet Cong delegation should be seated apart from the North Vietnamese delegation, stating the entire Communist delegations should be seated together.[85] The South Vietnamese peace delegation did not return to Paris until 24 January 1969.[86] William Bundy, the Assistant Secretary of State for Asian Affairs, summoned Diễm to a meeting where he accused him to his face of "improper" and "unethical" contacts with Chennault.[87] Johnson knew from information provided to him from the FBI, CIA, and the NSA of Chennault's efforts to sabotage the Paris peace talks, saying that the "*****" as he called her was guilty of treason.[88] John told his friend, the Republican Minority Leader in the Senate, Everett Dirksen, that: "We could stop the killing out there. But they've got this...new formula put in there-namely wait on Nixon. And they're killing four or five hundred a day waiting on Nixon".[89] On 2 November 1968, Johnson called Dirksen to say "I'm reading their hand. This is treason" with Dirksen saying in response "I know".[90] As much of this information was gathered illegally such as the FBI wiretapping phones without a warrant or was embarrassing to admit to such as that the NSA was reading South Vietnamese diplomatic cables, Johnson felt he could not have the Justice Department charge Chennault as much as he wanted to.[91] To charge Chennault would mean having to admit in court that NSA had broken and was reading South Vietnam's diplomatic codes, which in turn might trouble relations with other American allies who might might wonder if the NSA was reading their diplomatic cables as well. Johnson's National Security Adviser, Walt Whitman Rostow, urged him to "blow the whistle" and "destroy" Nixon, but the president demurred, saying it would be much too of a scandal if it emerged that the United States spied on South Vietnam, supposedly one of its leading allies.[92] The election was extremely close with Nixon winning 43.4% of the popular vote while Humphrey won 42.7% of the popular vote.[93] Given the extremely tight election, it was widely believed that Chennault's intervention may have been decisive as a peace agreement might have tipped the election in favor of Humphrey.[94]

In part because Nixon won the presidency, no one was prosecuted for this violation of the Logan Act.[95][96][97] Cartha "Deke" DeLoach, then FBI Deputy Director, mentioned in his book Hoover's FBI that his agency was only able to connect a single November 2, 1968 phone call from the then Vice President candidate Spiro Agnew to Anna Chennault, unrecorded details of which Johnson believed were subsequently transmitted to Nixon. Later liaisons with Nixon staff were by telephone to then aide John N. Mitchell via direct personal numbers that changed every several days, as was his custom.[98]

A week after the election and Nixon's fence-mending with Johnson in a joint statement announcing Vietnam policy, Mitchell asked Chennault to intercede again, this time to get Saigon to join the talks. She refused. According to her account, Nixon personally thanked her in 1969, she complained she "had suffered dearly" for her efforts on his behalf, and he replied, "Yes, I appreciate that. I know you are a good soldier."[99] The American historian Catherine Forslund argued that Chennault would have been in a good position to demand that Nixon appoint her ambassador to an important American ally or that she be given some other prestigious job as a reward, but Chennault declined, fearing that she might have to answer difficult questions during the Senate confirmation hearings.[99]

Chennault's interaction with the Paris Peace Accords on behalf of Nixon is sometimes called the "Chennault Affair."[100][101] Bundy in a later book stated about the "Chennault affair" that "probably no great chance was lost" for peace.[102] Farrell argued that given the incompatible agendas of Hanoi and Saigon with one wanting one Communist Vietnam and the other equally opposed that the chances for peace in the fall of 1968 were overrated.[103] He also argued that there was at least a moment of hope that there would be peace in Vietnam in 1968, and Nixon by encouraging Thiệu to be obscurantist via Chennault had ended that hope for purely partisan reasons, making it the "most reprehensible" of all Nixon's actions.[104] Assessments vary about the importance of Chennault's intervention in the 1968 election. The American historian Jules Witcover wrote that because Nixon won the election by 0.07% points that a peace agreement just before the election in October 1968 could have been decisive as even a small boost in the polls for Humphrey might have made the difference.[105] By contrast, Chennault's biographer, Catherine Forslund, told The Wall Street Journal that Thiệu would have acted to sabotage the peace talks in October 1968 without any prompting from Chennault, and at most the effects of her intervention was to encourage him to take a course of action that he would have taken anyhow.[106]

Simply outrageous.
 
He and Kissinger specifically sabotaged LBJ's peace talks to be able to use it to make him lose the election and then take power for themselves. Without their intervention the Viet Nam war would have been over (for the US, and perhaps even with South Viet Nam remaining free) several years and tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of casualties earlier.

A Cold War conceit there. And someone from Argentina should know better. Saying that remining under an authoritarian, bloody-handed, and human-rights-abusing regimes that were backed by Western Nations such as the U.S., UK, and France were "free," because they had not "fallen" to Communism, which was portrayed as automatically and universally WORSE. The Cold War was a "Dirty War." There were no "good guys," or "bad guys," at all, and neither side had any higher ground whatsoever. And, many, many war criminals and criminals against humanity came out of it, from the governments, militaries, big corporations (in the West's case), and the bands of solid international criminals, assassins, saboteurs, and terrorists that were the CIA, MI6, Mossand, KGB, and other such groups, as well as the governments, militaries, and secret police of the petty dictatorships propped by in Third World nations by both sides, and the monstrous insurgent militias they both backed and sponsored - high criminals of which only a small, tiny minority have been indicted, tried, and punished for these atrocious, Nuremberg-caliber crimes. So, please, don't confuse the Cold War with bringing "freedom" or a "better way of life" the tormented Third World Nations who had the misfortune of being the battleground, because the nuclear determent prevented a more direct conflict between the East and West Bloc.
 
Simply outrageous.
And then Reagan illegally sold weapons to Iran to fund rebels in Nicaragua, HW Bush provoked an uprising in Iraq and failed to back them so they got genocided, Bush used false pretenses to invade Iraq and now we have Trump soliciting foreign assistance in US elections. And then there is this:



But Hillary is crooked and many sides.
 
And then Reagan illegally sold weapons to Iran to fund rebels in Nicaragua, HW Bush provoked an uprising in Iraq and failed to back them so they got genocided, Bush used false pretenses to invade Iraq and now we have Trump soliciting foreign assistance in US elections. And then there is this:



But Hillary is crooked and many sides.

0 executive branch indictments under Obama huh?

Nice graphics, thanks for posting them. :)

From 2 years ago:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/20...nd-Convictions-A-Warning-for-Trump-Appointees
 
That's where they came from, though they updated the graphs last September.

The more and more I read about the Kurds, the most I feel about their situation. I was already upset by it but now it really hurts.
 
Top Bottom