"may have lived in Dallas previously"
Listen to yourself. You're making assumption upon assumption to defend something that isn't even known as a fact. You're taking the police department's side and rationalising their verdict based solely on you agreeing with them. You're not providing facts, you're speculating in ways that support their verdict.
This isn't a discussion, it's just you trying to find ways to argue that the dead guy was allegedly a dealer. Perhaps wait for more evidence to surface? Or at the very least, respect people (and their arguments) who believe in other explanations for his death.
Listen to yourself. You're making assumption upon assumption to defend something that isn't even known as a fact. You're taking the police department's side and rationalising their verdict based solely on you agreeing with them. You're not providing facts, you're speculating in ways that support their verdict.
This isn't a discussion, it's just you trying to find ways to argue that the dead guy was allegedly a dealer. Perhaps wait for more evidence to surface? Or at the very least, respect people (and their arguments) who believe in other explanations for his death.