I think I can agree with you that the phenomenon you describe exists, but I don't think it means that every journalist is secretly pushing a "statist" agenda, to use your terminology. It's just that being a journalist requires catching peoples attention, and sensationalism is a good way to achieve this. And nothing is more sensationalist than loudly yelling "why doesn't anybody do something about this??".It is in the subtext and the sensational style of reporting. While the reporters don't get to say what they believe, I think if they could it would be more honest than pretending to not have an agenda and officially having no editorial control over their content.
Case overwhelmingly stupid and over generalized... with a smugness that tends to be off-putting to those of us in the center...The media is generally made of well educated people, and well educated people are generally liberal.
Case closed.
The military, by and large, will be conservative.
Journalism, higher education, liberal...
No... in the US military, officers all have college degrees after the rank of Captain, and many get masters and PhDs...Are you really saying that educated people have a liberal bias?
Isn't that an insult to conservatives? (The implication being that the uneducated have a conservative bias)
That's relative to US politicians, who are world renowned for being among the most conservative people on the planet.
Did you read that paper? It's not great. It defines the center as the average American voter, so the center is already right-shifted.
No... in the US military, officers all have college degrees after the rank of Captain, and many get masters and PhDs...
MDs tend to be conservative, etc, etc, etc...
By higher education, I meant professors in higher education.
The U.S. media landscape is dominated by massive corporations that, through a history of mergers and acquisitions, have concentrated their control over what we see, hear and read. In many cases, these giant companies are vertically integrated, controlling everything from initial production to final distribution. In the interactive charts below we reveal who owns what.
Ummmm. No... not sure where you are getting that from...
Not what I am saying...
Though, I did read overall that PhDs lean liberal...
bernie14 said:how egocentric of me....i had not noticed if any other media was being discussed other than american media....to me, your statements are like "yeah, it's really cold in antartica...well, not compared to pluto"......
in regards to this study, american media, american politicians and american voters, the numbers are valid.....
Ummm... you're taking a step or two too far...You were saying that university professors tend to have a liberal bias which implies that the more educated you are, the more of a liberal bias you have, as professors are required to hold a phD.
Ummm... you're taking a step or two too far...
There are other PhDs out there that aren't liberal.
University professors =/= all of most educated
Liberal Arts majors would not have a job in this day and age without science and engineering majors. Case closed.
Right, overall they don't... but college professor tend to be more liberal...A phD represents one of the highest levels of education possible. And yeah, those who are educated don't hold a "liberal bias" or whatever, that's what I've been saying all along.
Well, you can disagree, but again, this is pretty much common knowledge... here are some stats to back it up...I went to University, I didn't see any "liberal bias" from any of my professors. Their political views almost never even came up, so I have no idea who they vote for.
So yeah, I'll have to disagree. This whole "our professors have a liberal bias" thing sounds like a talking point more than anything else.
Neil Gross, a professor of sociology at the University of British Columbia, whose previous work showed that Democrats outnumber Republicans by about 4 to 1 among professors, by at least 6 to 1 at elite universities, and by still higher ratios in departments of the humanities and social sciences.