warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
Just get a couple black officers to shoot some white kids dead and it'll all balance itself out.
http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/dataRestriction_inj.html
To a couple of the posts above this one. I of course expect that when an officer uses deadly force that he was justified in it, thats one of the things we pay them for. We expect them to use deadly force only when appropriate, we spend hundreds of millions of dolllars across the nation to ensure they are properly trained in all facets of their job. I expect that if I see on the news that someone was shot by the Police that the Police Officer involved used that training prior to pulling the trigger. When there are cases where they did not, I expect the legal system to handle it as needed.
Now to the stats, if we take a look we can see that whites were indeed killed in higher numbers then blacks but proportionally to their number in the population blacks have a higher percentage rate of death by Police. Continuing with that thought why is that you ask? Blacks have a significantly higher rate of crime then whites or any other race.
Lets take a look at one area of the country for instance. New York City.
Black Population: 23%
White Population: 35%
Crime in the City
Black shooting involved crimes: 80%
White shooting involved crimes: 1.8%
These stats albeit only a single area of the country represent a broader problem because in most urban areas Blacks are 2/3rds more likely to be involved in crime then any other ethnicity.
Why I ask myself would Blacks be shot by Police more often then Whites or any other ethnicity?
U.S. Dept. of Justice said:On August 4, 2014, the department issued a report that concluded that a deep-seated culture of violence is pervasive throughout the adolescent facilities at Rikers, and DOC staff routinely use force not as a last resort, but instead as a means to control the adolescent population and punish disorderly or disrespectful behavior.
ProPublica said:Young black males in recent years were at a far greater risk of being shot dead by police than their white counterparts 21 times greater i, according to a ProPublica analysis of federally collected data on fatal police shootings.
The 1,217 deadly police shootings from 2010 to 2012 captured in the federal data show that blacks, age 15 to 19, were killed at a rate of 31.17 per million, while just 1.47 per million white males in that age range died at the hands of police.
Reuters said:Whats emerging now is that, within the thin blue line of the NYPD, there is another divide - between black and white officers.
Reuters interviewed 25 African American male officers on the NYPD, 15 of whom are retired and 10 of whom are still serving. All but one said that, when off duty and out of uniform, they had been victims of racial profiling, which refers to using race or ethnicity as grounds for suspecting someone of having committed a crime.
The officers said this included being pulled over for no reason, having their heads slammed against their cars, getting guns brandished in their faces, being thrown into prison vans and experiencing stop and frisks while shopping. The majority of the officers said they had been pulled over multiple times while driving. Five had had guns pulled on them.
Please don't hold back. Just skip straight to the stage where you tell us how black people are inferior and deserve every shooting. Reeling your actual opinions out of you over several pages is tiresome enough without doing it in every thread.
Please don't hold back. Just skip straight to the stage where you tell us how black people are inferior and deserve every shooting. Reeling your actual opinions out of you over several pages is tiresome enough without doing it in every thread.
Fixed that for you.I don't think blacks are inferior, but I do think that American culture plays a huge part in propagating a violent black youth[...]
You can't refute his stats though. Blacks are much more likely to commit crimes in New York, so they're going to get shot more.
http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/dataRestriction_inj.html
To a couple of the posts above this one. I of course expect that when an officer uses deadly force that he was justified in it, thats one of the things we pay them for. We expect them to use deadly force only when appropriate, we spend hundreds of millions of dolllars across the nation to ensure they are properly trained in all facets of their job. I expect that if I see on the news that someone was shot by the Police that the Police Officer involved used that training prior to pulling the trigger. When there are cases where they did not, I expect the legal system to handle it as needed.
Now to the stats, if we take a look we can see that whites were indeed killed in higher numbers then blacks but proportionally to their number in the population blacks have a higher percentage rate of death by Police. Continuing with that thought why is that you ask? Blacks have a significantly higher rate of crime then whites or any other race.
Lets take a look at one area of the country for instance. New York City.
Black Population: 23%
White Population: 35%
Crime in the City
Black shooting involved crimes: 80%
White shooting involved crimes: 1.8%
These stats albeit only a single area of the country represent a broader problem because in most urban areas Blacks are 2/3rds more likely to be involved in crime then any other ethnicity.
Why I ask myself would Blacks be shot by Police more often then Whites or any other ethnicity?
You can't refute his stats though. Blacks are much more likely to commit crimes in New York, so they're going to get shot more.
Actually, his stats are refutable because they don't relate to commission of crimes. Blacks are far more likely to be caught committing crimes, but that is just as likely a result of differences in enforcement as it is incidence of law breaking.
Examine the results of the NYPD 'stop and frisk' program. The vast majority of people subjected to stop and frisk were people of color, so the vast majority of resulting contraband busts were people of color. You might conclude from this that the program was appropriately administered in that it caught all those colored people carrying contraband.
But the sad truth is that in the small percentage where a white person was stopped and frisked there was a much higher incidence of finding contraband...so what the program actually demonstrated is that white people were more likely to be committing the crime of carrying contraband, but far less likely to be caught at it. Had the program been administered fairly instead of targeting people of color it would have netted far more contraband busts for the same number of stops.
Garry here are the clearance rates from the FBI, your chart though good ignores a lot of crimes that are commited, ie no arrest made, so any projections to a populations race have an inbuilt guess or bias like any stat that does not have most of the information
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/clearances
![]()
They may be more likely to be caught, but you can't say that makes up for the 40:1 or 80:1 difference. You can't get around the fact that they are more likely to committ crimes. Be the reason social-economic or culture or whatever.
And the thing with "American Culture" you mention. A large part of that is black culture in the United States. Stephen A Smith(famous black sportscaster) makes a very good point:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovPQnc6CYgY
He's a very intelligent man.
Sorry Grraffito, Those are the best stats I have found on the matter so far. Your tables on "clearances" don't have any data on race so I'm not sure what you are getting at other than to say that it is a possibility that the racial breakdown of actual offenders may be different from that of who was initially arrested for the offenses (or whatever "arrests" means). That is certainly a possibility but we apparently don't have a "God's eye" perspective right now since the FBI doesn't seem to keep very good data on the topic of race and crime to begin with.![]()
it is probally not a good idea to believe this stat for a cop running down a dark alley at night after someone, because it will be part of their bias in dealing with the other person there, be they black or white...Crime in the City
Black shooting involved crimes: 80%
White shooting involved crimes: 1.8%
And the thing with "American Culture" you mention. A large part of that is black culture in the United States. Stephen A Smith(famous black sportscaster) makes a very good point:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovPQnc6CYgY
He's a very intelligent man.