Greetings, Comrade Virote.
Can't complain about the company, you are most certainly one of the sharp ones here, even if we might disagree on certain topics.
I found the "suggested links" and such below hilarious, and also the fact that it couldn't differentiate between different "totalitarian" groups, as if they, with their radically different ideologies, purposes, methods and reasoning, are the ones who are intrinsically the same as each other, whereas Enlightenmentist-government is fundamentally more different from other forms of itself...
Indeed. But this is a test made by propertarians (Libertarians is a word they stole from socialists and they have no right to use it). it is amazing what those people don't know.
This bit got me the most:
I mean, dayum, I thought I'd have to change the broken system to affect the broken policies stemming from it, but it turns out its easier and therefore obviously better to just fit new policies to the broken system...
How is it absurd? Its only absurd in the sense that every coherent group of people today follows an ideological system focused on individual rights. This isn't a belief that is set in stone - as is proved by previous the existence of totalitarian systems, which were generally reactions to the current system.
How about this for a totalitarian system. Everything is decided by an omnipotent, all wise market, which forces people to behave accordingly. All kinds of social relations are business oriented, you are no longer a citizen or a patient or a student, but a customer or a consumer.
Recommended reading: Herbert Marcuse: One-dimensional man.
http://www.quiz2d.com/quiz/Authoritarian.php?personal=48.2&economic=12.3
Hello fellow socialists, moderate fascists, croney capitalists, communitarians, and some theocrats
apparently we make the best buddies, and should all strive to make a liberal authoritarian paradise on earth, and since we all want the same thing I believe no prblems could arisefrom us joining forces
Hallo, fellow freedom hater. I'd love to write the constitution for that state!
Good ones.
Exactly.
By the way I took that other test, which presumably was the real Nolan Chart. That one was even worse. Long on triteness and pretentious waffle (how surprising), short on content. It made a liberal out of me, presumably because I didn't think homosexuals are the scum on Earth. And it used that silly term statist (sadist would have been a better one). In short, infantile, mind-numbing rubbish.
As expected, I might add.
