Pop 8 ruled unconstitutional by 9th Circuit panel!

Status
Not open for further replies.
In what sense is bi/homosexuality a fetish that heterosexuality is not? That's not rhetorical, I sincerely don't follow the logic.
 
In what sense is bi/homosexuality a fetish that heterosexuality is not? That's not rhetorical, I sincerely don't follow the logic.

Heterosexuality is what is normal, I don't think I have to explain further.

Moderator Action: Calling homosexuality a fetish, and by extension, implying homosexuality is a fetish, is considered trolling.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
See you say that but that statement is grossly insulting and possibly destructive. How do you think a teenage person who naturally feels gay feels when people like you tell them their natural feelings are a nasty little sin to be hated? Telling someone who they are is wrong and morally reprehensible is a terrible thing to do no matter how much you try to spin it as caring about them.

Masturbation is a sin, would I be a bad person for telling heterosexual teenagers that?

Calling homosexual acts immoral would only be homophobic if homosexuality was only about sex, but since that is only a small part of homosexuality it isn't homophobic.

There is nothing morally wrong with a person loving someone of the same sex. There is something morally wrong with two people of the same sex engaging in sex.
 
You keep your fetish in the privacy of your own home, don't show pictures to people you just met whats that about?

Just wondering, how often to gay people come up to you and talk about sex in front of you? Or show you pictures?

Also, lol for marriage = sex argument. Marriage isn't sex... I don't know what kind of mindset you have to have to think gay marriage = gay sex. In public no less. And apparently they tell you all about it.
 
I'm not even gay and I'm offended.
 
Masturbation is a sin, would I be a bad person for telling heterosexual teenagers that?

Calling homosexual acts immoral would only be homophobic if homosexuality was only about sex, but since that is only a small part of homosexuality it isn't homophobic.

There is nothing morally wrong with a person loving someone of the same sex. There is something morally wrong with two people of the same sex engaging in sex.

If you're homosexual you have homosexual type of attraction - attraction to the same sex. It pretty much defines your life in the same sense that me being attracted to girls defines and drives me.

If somebody told me "Your attraction to women is wrong and has to stop. I hate it. But I don't hate you", I'd get offended. Wouldn't you?

It's akin to saying "I don't hate that you're black, but I hate your blackness"

It doesn't make much sense.
 
Heterosexuality is what is normal, I don't think I have to explain further.

Bigotry and intolerance are apparently normal, but they certainly should be explained.
 
Because teenagers have enough trouble figuring themselves out with you beating them over the head with your idiosyncratic sexual morality in some bizarre attempt to demonstrate that sexual neuroses are, in fact, a transferable disease.

Because Black is a skin color, a hereditary trait, Homosexual acts are a behavior.
So are heterosexual acts. What's the difference?
 
Because teenagers have enough trouble figuring themselves out with you beating them over the head with your idiosyncratic sexual morality in some bizarre attempt to demonstrate that sexual neuroses are, in fact, a transferable disease.

i have never beaten anyone over their head, also, everyone has the right to free speech.

So are heterosexual acts. What's the difference?

Because Heterosexual acts are essential to society.
 
Because Black is a skin color, a hereditary trait, Homosexual acts are a behavior.

Claiming Welsh identity after just living there for a couple of years is very much a behaviour, but you don't get people yelling at you that God hates non-Welsh people.

Because Heterosexual acts are essential to society.
Nope, they're not. Reproduction is essential and that can be easily done without coitus these days.
 
i have never beaten anyone over their head...
You hardly need to, when the entire Christian establishment will do it for you.

...also, everyone has the right to free speech.
So you wouldn't tell a racist to shut his gob?

Because Heterosexual acts are essential to society.
Sexual reproduction, yes, but not heterosexual monogamy. The Vulcan approach would work just as well as whatever we having going if that's all you want out of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom