Snerk
Smeghead
Thanks. I think I got it. I think. Think.I'm crossing my fingers for you.
I can still have nicotine free cookies.Cookie Monster becoming just Monster now?
Thanks. I think I got it. I think. Think.I'm crossing my fingers for you.
I can still have nicotine free cookies.Cookie Monster becoming just Monster now?
Sounds like socialism or Chinese overreach. Unnecessary Government interference with the free market. The "equal time" rule was dumped by Reagan allowing the pure propaganda of Rush and Fox News.
I'm thinking since the main objective is to fight "cancel culture" the way to do it would be once a platform decides to allow someone to use that platform, they cannot unilaterally deny access later on due to disagreements with the message or opinion being shared. Once granted access to a platform, someone can only be removed from that platform by mutual agreement between the platform and the user, or a unilateral decision by the user to no longer use the platform.
So to go back to the Chapelle example: under the above system, Netflix would not legally be allowed to remove Dave Chapelle's special from their platform unless he agreed to have it taken down. Nor would they be allowed to use loophole tactics like keeping it on there, but programming their algorithm to make sure it doesn't show up in search results or recommended shows. Once they agree to put his content on their platform, it would have to stay there until he decides to remove it. To ensure compliance, digital platforms would be required to make their algorithms available for government inspection at anytime and notify/get approval from the government anytime they want to make changes to the algorithm.
If platforms aren't allowed to ever remove anything they host, they'll just stop hosting most things completely
And then those platforms disappear since their entire reason for existing would be gone. Which, of course, is the point.
So, in your alleged attempt to expand free speech, you'd actually gag free speech, apparently as intended.
As for the platforms themselves, I don't want to gag their right to free speech. I want to put reasonable restrictions on their freedom of association to keep them from violating others' right to free speech.
"Sweet, like paying higher wages and treating people with dignity???"
"nah"
So I'm in a bit of a bind
Situation: I've been working full-time close to two years now. In many ways I'm very lucky. It's a secure full-time job with a long career basically guaranteed ahead of me if I stick with it, close to home, great and supportive managers and coworkers. But the workload is high. It's pretty stressful at times. Pay's... fine. I can cover all the essentials but not afford much beyond that. And I'm unhappy. I don't find the work fulfilling at all. My health, mental and physical, is taking a beating. This isn't really want I want to do with my life and as much as I appreciate the last two years at this company I feel that it's time to move on.
I have an idea of what I want to do in the medium term: study GIS and surveying while working to improve my art - geography and drawing being two things that I've always been passionate about ever since I can remember, but from which I've been deterred because for whatever reason I wasn't really free to make my own choices. And now, having built some semblance of an independent life over the last couple of years and with my 30s approaching I feel like I need to make that leap now.
But transitioning between where I am and where I want to be, that's going to be tricky. I'm renting, and I've got debts to pay back. I'm afraid leaving this for a part-time or casual job that gives me the time to study, or work on my art, or look after my health, will only leave me with a worse job and even worse prospects for improvement. I'm also afraid of telling my family, who's depending on me to help pay debts. I've got a supportive partner which is awesome, but he's not in a position to pay the bills for the both of us.
I'm trying to treat this like a project with timelines and goals and looking at things objectively and it looks very possible and I can pull it off if I put in some effort, but there is still this raw visceral fear that's holding me back, that whatever choice I make I'm throwing my life away. Staying where I am is on the surface the safe option, but it's killing me. It's not sustainble. But I don't know if I can make it out there in the world. I'm risking a lot. But I don't want to feel trapped anymore.
So if anyone wants to offer advice, or admonition, or solace, please, I think I need all the help I can get right now.