Random Rants Q': I protest against subtitles

Status
Not open for further replies.
It might, and that would indeed be a good thing. However, I would not hold my breath, and the measures I recommend are pretty much sure to help.

I am certain that a number of shows on british tv in the late 90s-early 00s could never be there now. Back then abuse was regarded as just funny :o
It is even more obvious in comedy: if the comedian can't say stuff, they run out of material pretty fast. Even if they are decent and can come up with a few sets that are funny and don't contain anything offensive, it's not viable in the long run.

I think the solution is to be purely cerebral. And kill those who can't be :yup:
 
I do not get this recent trend of complaining about people saying nasty things on the internet.

Do not get me wrong, the world would be a better place if everyone was nicer to everyone else. However, online abuse is older than the internet, as are the tools to combat it *. Is not the whole thing about millenials that they grew up with the internet, how is it that oldies like me have to tell them how it works?

Spoiler * :
The 3 main ways to combat online abuse, in descending order with about an order of magnitude of importance between each:
  1. Personal anonymity.
  2. Choice of fora
  3. Use of clients that filter content
The CBC website (where I get my news and post comments) put in a new policy a few years ago to require that everyone use their real names. Said names would go through a vetting process before being accepted. This was meant to prompt people to be nicer.

It didn't work, and the moderation there is insanely inconsistent. Say something factual and neutral and your comment gets "deactivated" (someone made a Borg reference to that the other day when I mentioned being "deactivated" for typing the words "Margaret Atwood" and "The Handmaid's Tale"). I've seen threads of nonstop abuse be allowed to remain.

Apparently some of Canada's dead Prime Ministers have decided to comment from the grave, given that Robert Borden is a commenter there. Deanna Troi is commenting from the 24th century, and Reggie Mantle is commenting from the Archie comics.

Of course I can't be a hypocrite; I don't use my real name there, either (considering my political views are almost opposite to how most people think and vote here, I'd be an idiot to make myself a target). The name I use does sound like a real name (it's a character from one of my favorite novels)... so real, in fact, that I've been told to "go back where you came from" as it doesn't sound like an "Old-stock Canadian" name. I also occasionally get mistaken for a male poster by people who can't spell.

But it goes to show how idiotic this "real names policy" is, when they can't tell the difference between real people and Star Trek characters.

Has this made me a nicer person on that site? No. Would it make me nicer there if I absolutely had to use my real name? No. My opinions don't change depending on what name I'm using. There are lines I don't cross, however, such as commenting on politicians' or royals' underage children.

I am certain that a number of shows on british tv in the late 90s-early 00s could never be there now. Back then abuse was regarded as just funny :o
It is even more obvious in comedy: if the comedian can't say stuff, they run out of material pretty fast. Even if they are decent and can come up with a few sets that are funny and don't contain anything offensive, it's not viable in the long run.

I think the solution is to be purely cerebral. And kill those who can't be :yup:
I'll admit that one of my favorite Britcoms would never make it on the air nowadays. There's some racist and sexist content in Are You Being Served? that would definitely not meet modern standards. As time goes on, I find myself not rewatching the worst episodes.

I actually met a Walmart clerk that reminded me of Mrs Slocombe (in a bad way; that character could be a real (w)itch when she wanted to be).
 
I do not get this recent trend of complaining about people saying nasty things on the internet.

Do not get me wrong, the world would be a better place if everyone was nicer to everyone else. However, online abuse is older than the internet, as are the tools to combat it *. Is not the whole thing about millenials that they grew up with the internet, how is it that oldies like me have to tell them how it works?

Spoiler * :
The 3 main ways to combat online abuse, in descending order with about an order of magnitude of importance between each:
  1. Personal anonymity.
  2. Choice of fora
  3. Use of clients that filter content
In a forum like CFC, anonymity diminishes over time as a community builds and moderation filters the content to keep things civil. :)
 
In a forum like CFC, anonymity diminishes over time as a community builds and moderation filters the content to keep things civil. :)
Indeed. See my point 2 (Choice of fora), and I am here quite a bit.
 
In a forum like CFC, anonymity diminishes over time as a community builds and moderation filters the content to keep things civil. :)
You're a funny guy. :lol:
 
The beeb is supposed to be a public service and advert free (at least in the UK). This is on the front page of bbc news ATM, and how can it not be an advert? Who is lining their pockets I wonder?
Spoiler BBC Advert :

bbc-adverts.png
 
If we're ranting about the BBC website, can we also talk about their crappy GDPR "compliance"?

BBC website GDPR settings.png

This is just the upper fifth of the list (scrollbar highlighted).

And every single "Legitimate interest" slider (there are 7 of them in total) has to be individually deactivated...
 
The beeb is supposed to be a public service and advert free (at least in the UK). This is on the front page of bbc news ATM, and how can it not be an advert? Who is lining their pockets I wonder?

Really? I didn't see that.
 
Really? I didn't see that.
I guess it is personalised then. It is still there for me, on the second row of stories.

If it is personalised, I think they do not know what they are doing. I cannot imagine there are many people further from boohoo's target audience than me.
 
Oh, I found it, hiding in the top corner.

Spoiler for BBC News image :
upload_2021-5-5_10-30-6.png

On the other hand, I can't see this article without thinking of the 80s song The Time of My Life.

upload_2021-5-5_10-33-42.png
 
"Personalization" and A/B testing is how they figure things out and learn better placements.
 
"Personalization" and A/B testing is how they figure things out and learn better placements.
The point is that public stations are supposed to be commercial/ad-free.

That's obviously a thing of the past. Yes, the CBC has commercials. Yes, the CBC has a 2-tier streaming service on its website, but they missed by a mile in persuading me to actually pay for additional content that I'm already paying for in my cable package (their 24-hour news channel). So I keep my ABP activated and am not bothered by the ads (though there are blocks of space here and there that have the word "advertisement" in them).

The CBC receives $$$$$$$$ of funding from the government every year. Gem, their streaming service, should not need to charge for the 24-hour news channel. And we have 2 more main news anchors than we need (they promoted 4 of the next tier when the main anchor retired; it should be obvious by now which should be kept and which not).

And speaking of Gem, I still have one season left to watch of the show I was binge-watching awhile back.
 
It is even more obvious in comedy: if the comedian can't say stuff, they run out of material pretty fast. Even if they are decent and can come up with a few sets that are funny and don't contain anything offensive, it's not viable in the long run.

The trick is to punch up when you're being offensive. Don't tell jokes that are just "here's my take on this old racial stereotype that you've heard some variation of a thousand times," tell jokes about people in positions of power.
 
So they have this wearable airbag vest that motorcycle guys can wear to not die so frequently.
https://www.cyclegear.com/gear/klim-ai-1-airbag-vest

In&Motion Subscription Service
Buy the vest from Cycle Gear.

Download the “My In&Box” phone app.

Buy a subscription plan from In&Motion to activate the vest:

  • Choose from $12 per month or $120 per year subscription options, which include an unlimited In&Box warranty, VIP support services and anytime cancellation.
  • Or choose the $399 one-time purchasing option which includes a 2-year warranty and classic support services. The subscription service is provided for life.
Note: Without the subscription service through In&Motion, the airbag system is non-operational. Euro to USD exchange rates are subject to change.

All purchasing options include continuous algorithm updates and smartphone app dashboard interface. The app also displays battery level and available software updates. You can update your In&Box system to the latest algorithm using your phone.
$12 a month or the airbag won't work.
<3 America
 
Rant: I am a drunk and a waster ! Just like my dad would always say I will be. He must be proud in the afterlife.
 
How can they be so cruel?
BBC said:
NYC snow days: Dismay as school snow days cancelled

Snow days have been cancelled for public schools in New York City, with students now expected to continue their classes from home.

Snow days see schools and similar institutions close when there is heavy snowfall or other extreme weather.

Authorities say students successfully managed the move to remote learning during lockdowns, and the days off will not continue in the new school year.

But many people have been left disappointed by the decision.

Before the Covid pandemic, snow days were popular and seen as a special childhood experience.

They do not occur often in New York City - Mayor Bill de Blasio only declared seven during his first five years in office, according to the New York Times.

The New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE), which manages the largest school district in the country, announced the change in its 2021-2022 school year calendar. While it is not clear if the change is permanent, it is a continuation of the city's move in September to stop snow days while the majority of students were schooled remotely because of the pandemic.

The department said the new policy was aimed at enabling the city to meet its requirement of 180 days of schooling.

"We are sad for a year without snow days," NYCDOE spokeswoman Danielle Filson told CNN.

"But we must meet the state mandate and we can leverage the technology we invested in during the pandemic so our students get the instructional days required by the state," she added.

Many disappointed students, parents and teachers took to social media to reminisce about snowball fights and bobsled races.

"It seems like callousness bordering on cruelty to scrap one of childhood's greatest pleasures in favour of a rehash of pandemic life," New York Times opinion columnist Michelle Goldberg wrote.

Others have pointed out that while snow days often placed added pressure on families to find last-minute carers, a sudden move to home learning was just as difficult.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57037250
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom