Even if "King Andrew the First" wasn't objectively wrong, who in the hell writes out their regnal numerals in full?
I always assumed that was the standard.
Even if "King Andrew the First" wasn't objectively wrong, who in the hell writes out their regnal numerals in full?
Distinction without difference.Physical description, not a regal one. :3
Yeah, like the Pulaskis, the Carolines, the Dinwiddies, the King Williams, and the - oh, wait.
Dr. Daniel Jackson should have stayed dead!
I'm gating you to a black hole.
Oh, the bears were put in intimidation duty, keeping the US Hollywood unions from showing their faces in BC.
Spoiler :I am FURIOUS.
I worked my ass off on an annotated bibliography. Thought I did everything my prof asked. Found what few relevant articles there are on an incredibly arcane and appallingly dull topic I was more or less forced to choose. Turned it in... and got a 1/100. A ONE. That's an insult. What the hell could possibly justify that? Yes, it has problems, but a ONE?! I had the required number of sources, I summarized them, etc. I'd be better off skipping class and spending my time on other activities. If he doesn't let me redo everything, I'm going to fail the course, lose scholarships, and maybe drop out of college, since I have to maintain a high GPA to get scholarships. I have NEVER had this problem with any annotated bib before, and I've never had such a harsh professor.
I'd remind you that Russia was never a signatory to the treaty so most likely they would be the source of the attack.