Random Raves XII: I grabbed two beers and bailed.

[Cull]

Its made by Bill3000. Everything Bill does is good.

 

[Bobbtjoe]

I STARTED A NEW STORY!!! http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=375042 I like starting these stories, they're fun to write. Now, this doesn't mean I won't be continuing my last story, (I plan to write an update for that tonight) I just thought it would be fun to write something inbetween. I read a recent strategy for winning the Civ 4 demo and just had to try it out. The community over there in the Civ 4 Stories forum is growing rather well, and that's a rave in its self.


Swimming was nice.

 

[W|M]

You cheat in the story! you´re playing on settler!

 

[Bobbtjoe]

You cheat in the story! you´re playing on settler!

But it would be impossible to win on any other difficulty.

 

[W|M]

Noble warrior/axeman rush is pretty achievable

 

[Zack]

Bob: Are you kidding?

 

[Mango Elephant]

You cheat in the story! you´re playing on settler!

I wouldn't call it 'cheating' if that's his skill level.

 

[W|M]

 

[Bobbtjoe]

Noble warrior/axeman rush is pretty achievable

But when your playing on a fairly large map, and ther's no bronze near your capital, and there's a 100 turn limit, your options are kinda slim. It's still quite a feat.

Bob: Are you kidding?

Hey, who says I can't do 3 stories at once.

I wouldn't call it 'cheating' if that's his skill level.

It's not my difficulty level, I'm a Noble palyer. It's just that what I am trying to accomplish is so difficult it'd be impossible on any other difficulty.

 

[Cull]

For a noble player, maybe. For a reasonably high level player, noble is reasonable.

 

[madviking]

I'm gonna buy Victoria II instead of Civ 5.

Civ3 > Civ4 > Civ5

 

[Cull]

I agree with madviking, only

Civ 4> Civ 3> Everything but Civ 5> Civ 5

 

[Bobbtjoe]

Civ V's gonna be beast, what are you guys talking about?

Having the house to myself is nice.

 

[W|M]

Civ 4> Civ 5 if it didn´t have Steam> Civ 3

 

[Zack]

Anything > complaining about Steam

 

[madviking]

I agree with madviking, only

Civ 4> Civ 3> Everything but Civ 5> Civ 5

Civ 4> Civ 5 if it didn´t have Steam> Civ 3

Civ3 was the last great Civ game. After Civ3 they went from strategy board game to an history emulator. Let Total War handle the history emulators.

Civ V's gonna be beast, what are you guys talking about?

Having the house to myself is nice.

Dude. When a game focuses on grfx more than gameplay, that's a problem.

 

[Mango Elephant]

I don't even know what Steam is, but I pretend to hate it to feel included.

 

[Cull]

I believe Civ 4 did have gameplay, but after Civ 3 it was on a slippery slope, but Civ 4 came out before it was too late.

And Vicky 2 demo is fun. Even thought I suck at it.

 

[Bobbtjoe]

Steam's awesome. And so is Civ V's gameplay.

I'm having fun playing TF2.

 

[W|M]

Steam's awesome. And so is Civ V's gameplay.

I cannot comprehend how that is possible, cIV is a LOT better than ciV, and civ III has too much micro-management. If it didn´t have that much micro-management, it would be a lot better, even though it was already a great game. my favorite civ was Persia.