The structure of the health care system can make a big difference with preventative care costs, but yeah: Mostly you need to push the cost effective tests and keep a lid on the ineffective ones. ie - done right on a massive scale and you save money, done wrong and you lose it.
The US system isn't set up to do it right - save money - atm. Not even close.
I was thinking of things like free immunisation, education programs, help-lines, routine checkups, various screening programs for at-risk populations and the like.
Yeah - it can be surprisingly effective if you keep your eye on the ball. IIRC Germany doesn't do to well with it but.... er... Japan does? I don't remember the study...
OTOH, I do remember reading that some US hospitals were starting to spring for basic preventative care for uninsured patients - people who weren't getting any. Purely as a cost saving measure - having them show up in the emergency room was a big drain. I don't know how it turned out, though. (And my google fu just failed me.)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.