Well the Russian Army has shown itself to be mostly ineffective and in dire need of foreign help in both weapons and troops. Spies, malware, and internet trolls are what remain of Russian international relations.
This, pretty much:Well the Russian Army has shown itself to be mostly ineffective and in dire need of foreign help in both weapons and troops. Spies, malware, and internet trolls are what remain of Russian international relations.
As both military force and sanctions have shown themselves to be ineffective against Russia, trash talking in the internet and TV is mostly what the West is still able to do.
With Glide Bombs And Anti-Tank Missiles, The Russians Are Beating Back The Ukrainian 47th Mechanized Brigade—And Marching On Pokrovsk
Steadily advancing behind a barrage of devastating glide bombs and firing anti-tank missiles by the truckload, Russian troops are now just 11 miles east of Pokrovsk, a key Ukrainian stronghold in eastern Ukraine’s Donetsk Oblast.
Morozovsk was not hit, or do you mean some other news ?Another visible recent trend is Ukrainian supporters posting old links in social media, trying to make it look like this is today's news. Happened before of course, just not as often.
Another visible recent trend is Ukrainian supporters posting old links in social media, trying to make it look like this is today's news.
Another visible recent trend is Ukrainian supporters posting old links in social media, trying to make it look like this is today's news. Happened before of course, just not as often.
They already did? Like it was literally the first thing that happened in the war. And most of the captured territory that hasn’t been recaptured is exactly the territory that Russian policy highlighted needed to be extricated from Ukrainian control, pretty much in its entirety. Like all the territories anyone argued over for a decade. As in everything going exactly according to plan.Then why is Russia operating at a snail's pace if all of this were ineffective? Why can't Russia blitzkrieg anymore like it's late 1944 early '45?
With just a 3 years delay, only half a million people killed, and of course this is an acknowledgement that NATO was never the reason of the war.They already did? Like it was literally the first thing that happened in the war. And most of the captured territory that hasn’t been recaptured is exactly the territory that Russian policy highlighted needed to be extricated from Ukrainian control, pretty much in its entirety. Like all the territories anyone argued over for a decade. As in everything going exactly according to plan.
Sorry to be a pedant, but it can't have been the first thing because it wasn't actually called a war at that point.They already did? Like it was literally the first thing that happened in the war. And most of the captured territory that hasn’t been recaptured is exactly the territory that Russian policy highlighted needed to be extricated from Ukrainian control, pretty much in its entirety. Like all the territories anyone argued over for a decade. As in everything going exactly according to plan.
Well, yeah. It’s war. You kill people and take their stuff. This is as things have ever been, and ever shall be.With just a 3 years delay, only half a million people killed, and of course this is an acknowledgement that NATO was never the reason of the war.
Er, the invasion? I mean, if you really want to say “but that wasn’t technically the war yet,” I mean, whatever. Like the most useful piece of advice I can give you is “look at this as if you’re a general on one side planning your move before hitting the next turn button.” If your problem is that the west is in Ukraine and is using the Kiev government to set up their black sites and expand their footprint, your solution is to throw a spanner in the works by breaking the perception of Ukraine’s inedible unity and by stressing the government until their agents need to start throwing grenades at city councils. You also want to try to tear off the most valuable land that you have an actual material interest in, it possible. And you’ll design your approach so that it presents the best long term opportunity, in your own view of course, to walk away from the table with the lion’s share of spoils. Calling it a war or not at that point is a rules lawyer detail for, indeed, the world’s rules lawyers at the war crimes office of the UN. Was this bad? Well it wasn’t technically a war. But what I really want to know is how much more cash I’m getting.Sorry to be a pedant, but it can't have been the first thing because it wasn't actually called a war at that point.
Okay, great. Like I said, maybe you guys should try to look at this more objectively, rather than as what you think are citizens of an enlightened culture unlike any other in history, “debating” against a poor fool of a warmongering nation, as if you aren’t exactly the same in every wayOn top of that, we had posters (nevermind media folk) repeatedly defending the fact that it was a "special military operation" which meant it was a) not a formal war and therefore b) magically immune to the real world consequences of formally declaring war.
FSB can set any number spy site they want in Belarus on the border of EU, it would never been invade for that reason.Well, yeah. It’s war. You kill people and take their stuff. This is as things have ever been, and ever shall be.
As for the “reason” of the war what other answers do you need? What reason does the CIA set up black sites? They are nations at war, and they’ll kill as many people as they have to to convince the enemy to give up. It was true in the chevauchees and it is still true today.
[...] as if you aren’t exactly the same in every way
Putin planned to have his army decimated and be required to depend upon NK and China for supplies? Putin planned for 3 year or more war? He planned on NATO expanding?As in everything going exactly according to plan.
Well, no, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that spy sites are great for hurting your enemies without having to respect their "rights."FSB can set any number spy site they want in Belarus on the border of EU, it would never been invade for that reason.
That just doesn't seem possible.Russia is not the same way. Or it's the same way, but centuries later.
Well, and to acquire the territories he wanted, create a war-wound for infinite money, bleed the west during a time of septic economic dysfunction, take your pick. Dependent on China, that's one thing - but better to reign in hell than etc. etc.Putin planned to have his army decimated and be required to depend upon NK and China for supplies? Putin planned for 3 year or more war? He planned on NATO expanding?
For example, this one is not a repost (the same submarine was hit in September, and was repaired since)Another visible recent trend is Ukrainian supporters posting old links in social media, trying to make it look like this is today's news. Happened before of course, just not as often.
Tell me, do the Russians still have this weird view of Finland as a friendly country that "only wants to trade"?As for NATO's expansion, hasn't that been a constant since its beginning?