Shoot The President And Win A Kewpie Doll!

Formaldehyde

Both Fair And Balanced
Joined
Jan 29, 2003
Messages
33,999
Location
USA #1
Obama-game.jpg


Obama-like target in carnival game stirs outrage

Because of what he now calls "an error in judgment," a Lehigh Valley carnival operator has sparked an outcry by running at summer church carnivals and fire department fund-raisers a shooting-gallery game that featured a President Obama-like figure.

"I didn't think it was offensive, and you know, I made the wrong judgment on it," Irvin L. Good Jr., 68, said Wednesday. "And that's all I can say about it. We did away with it, and I'm apologizing to everybody in the world, I think."

Good, who has operated Goodtime Amusements in Hellertown for 26 years, said he used the Alien Attack game for about five weeks without hearing complaints.

Then, at a July 24 carnival at Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Roseto, Kathryn Chapman, there with her family, noticed that one of the win-a-prize painted targets was a black man wearing a suit with a rolled-up "health bill" in one hand - and an eagle-emblazoned belt buckle reading, "The Prez Says."

Chapman, who said she was a third-grader at Our Lady of Mount Carmel's school on the day President John F. Kennedy was shot, said seeing children and adults shooting at the target conjured up bad memories.

"That was incredibly disturbing to me that they would have this type of carnival game for children to be able to play," said Chapman, now a mother living in Massachusetts. "Even little kids, third- and fourth-graders, a lot of kids know who the president of the United States is."

She said she complained to Good and got nowhere. So she took photos and sent them to the Easton Express-Times newspaper.

After pictures of the carnival target appeared on the Internet Tuesday, criticism came in from near and far. By Wednesday, scores of Web postings denounced Good, and some of his Northampton County neighbors were voicing anger.

"He should be put out of business," Esther M. Lee, president of the Bethlehem chapter of the NAACP, told The Inquirer on Wednesday. "We shouldn't go around targeting the president of the United States as though he were some dumbbell."

In his defense, Good pointed out that the carnival target had alien antennae and bore little resemblance to Obama.

"The face didn't look like him or anything like that," Good said. "It wasn't designed to be that way. I guess you could see a likeness to it if you wanted to."

The NAACP's Lee said Good should have known what the figure represented. "He knew what he was doing," she said. "It's not right. . . . It's not funny, and he ought to pay."

The Secret Service routinely asks questions in such instances. Good would not say whether the agency had called him. "I can't comment on that," he said. "Not until after tomorrow." A Secret Service spokesman also declined to comment.

Good, a registered Republican, said he voted for Obama as "the most logical choice" in 2008. Obama's performance has been "adequate under the situation of what he came in under," he added.

"I wouldn't want his job. That's for sure," he said. "Maybe he wouldn't want mine either, right now."

Local news story picked up by the AP:


Link to video.

TYT take on the matter:


Link to video.

Do you think this carnival operator should be allowed to provide this "attraction"? If not, what should the appropriate punishment be?
 
This was an excercise in poor judgement by the operator (he could have gotten away with it if he avoided the health bill and the belt buckle) but he shouldn't be put out of business or anything. Small fine or have him replace the target and leave it at that.
 
In before "Oh this political correctness!" Blatant racism.
 
This game looks very patriotic, actually; you gotta shoot an alien masquerading as your President for, I would assume, malicious purposes, which could put the United States, neigh, the world (as if they're two distinct entities, right? Right?! ;)) at risk.
 
In before "Oh this political correctness!" Blatant racism.

Don't know if it's racists (if it's only one on one, isn't it only a tragedy?), but it sure is political.

It is extreme (censorable) free speech?
 
This was an excercise in poor judgement by the operator (he could have gotten away with it if he avoided the health bill and the belt buckle) but he shouldn't be put out of business or anything. Small fine or have him replace the target and leave it at that.

What possible fine could be attached, if he has committed no crime? IMO a sign of poor judgement, but he has most likely committed no crime.
 
That was my only reservation. The act isn't inflamatory enough to warrant a fine, but the guy needs to at least be scolded. At the very least have him replace the picture.
 
That was my only reservation. The act isn't inflamatory enough to warrant a fine, but the guy needs to at least be scolded. At the very least have him replace the picture.

If it isn't illegal then it isn't illegal.
 
Just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean it isn't wrong. The guy has people shooting at a black guy in a suit with a health bill and a buckle saying "I'm the prez". That sort of removes all doubt about who he is implying the person is.
Its easy to fix, cut off the part that looks like the bill and paint over the belt buckle. That then begs the question, why didn't the operator do that in the first place?
 
Yes it is wrong, but who's going to fine him?
 
Just because something isn't illegal doesn't mean it isn't wrong. The guy has people shooting at a black guy in a suit with a health bill and a buckle saying "I'm the prez". That sort of removes all doubt about who he is implying the person is.
Its easy to fix, cut off the part that looks like the bill and paint over the belt buckle. That then begs the question, why didn't the operator do that in the first place?

It may be wrong and in bad taste but if it isn't illegal (indeed it is protected by the first amendment) then there is nothing that law enforcement can do about it.
 
In before "Oh this political correctness!" Blatant racism.

As an anti-political correct person, this is what I have to say: I think this little stunt was tastless, and a mistake to say the absolute least. I don't see what makes it racist though. I mean just because the President happens to be black, we're saying anyone that shoots him is a racist. But what if the president was white? No one would say he was shot just because the shooter was racist.

Still though, I absolutely hate this thing even though it's not exactly racist. Just because something isn't racist dosen't mean it isn't bad. Shooting a president is always wrong, especially a President as good as Obama that is leading the country in such troubling times.
 
In before "Oh this political correctness!" Blatant racism.

How the hell do you know it's racism? Is it not possible to hate Obama for any reason other than his race? Didn't a lot of people hate Bush?

What's with this obsession that leftist nutcases have with race? Is that all Obama is to you, a black man? Is that his sole or most important trait?
 
Guy recognizes his error in judgement and apologizes profusely. So whats the issue?

And the image looks nothing like Obama. My kid could do a better job drawing the President than that. Looks more like Arsenio Hall with antenne.
 
This game looks very patriotic, actually; you gotta shoot an alien masquerading as your President for, I would assume, malicious purposes, which could put the United States, neigh, the world (as if they're two distinct entities, right? Right?! ;)) at risk.

When I saw the alien antennas I immediately thought it was a reference to the questions some people have about Obama's place of birth.

What I can't believe is that someone who would make something like this would actually vote for Obama. He is either lying or was just really trying to appeal to his market, the largely conservative and rural people that usually attend state fairs. In which case, this was kind of a good idea...A good bad idea...
 
Whilst it's obviously not good to feature the likeness of any real person in a shooting game, it really isn't that big of an issue/incident. Accept the apology, move on.
 
Guy recognizes his error in judgement and apologizes profusely. So whats the issue?
Recognizing that you made an error in judgment does not eliminate one's culpability for making said error.

That one could make such an error innocently is beyond belief.
 
Back
Top Bottom