Single Player bugs and crashes v35 plus (SVN) - After the 18th of August 2014

No Meso is just fine. (And I don't remember Meso with free courthouse for sometime now). It's been geared to be a good early religion that by Late Classical to early Med Era you will be moving on from to a later Religion as your Main religion.

Example, I keep Tengrii till after Judaism or longer till Tao is available. Sometimes until Christianity as well but the point is that I do (and it's meant to be this way) move on to a later religion when I can as the mid game progresses.

JosEPh

Allright. Yeah i´ve understod about the early and late tactics about the religions. And i like that it´s a tactic you can go for. Its gives religion options more depth and you as a player have to make some tough decisions sometimes.
About the free courthouse i brought up, i meen from one of the wonders. But you probebly got that :)
It might been changed now. This was my first time playing the under dev. version. If it is changed, the civilopedia still reads like before. So perhaps a change is in order in that case.
Any who, have a good one :)
Loffas
 
Is the comment about courthouses in the strategy or pedia text or elsewhere? If in the first two then it is a bug. If elsewhere then it is a true effect as that stuff is derived from the XML.
 
i get immediate CTD if i use a stack of bombers to airstrike other units but there is too many bombing missions than there are units to strike. The same thing happens if auto airstrike is used and it cannot find a airstrike mission

Latest SVN as of tonight
 
i get immediate CTD if i use a stack of bombers to airstrike other units but there is too many bombing missions than there are units to strike. The same thing happens if auto airstrike is used and it cannot find a airstrike mission

Latest SVN as of tonight

This is the sort of error that is best sorted if you could provide a save with instructions on how to reproduce the crash.
 
View attachment AutoSave_AD-2345-Winter.rar

go through the motions, chose tech and whatnot

then shiftclick on the propeller strategic bombers (select all) in Thalmanalco and then Airstrike (S key) Xochicalco

next thing that happens is that ui locks up and if you click on minimap or any of the airplanes you get a CTD.
 
SVN 8348.

Jivarro Llama Archer is a red blob.
 
View attachment 390485

go through the motions, chose tech and whatnot

then shiftclick on the propeller strategic bombers (select all) in Thalmanalco and then Airstrike (S key) Xochicalco

next thing that happens is that ui locks up and if you click on minimap or any of the airplanes you get a CTD.

game goes CTD when ending turn every time, first i thought it was the discovery of applied economics that did it, but now i am not so sure.


View attachment 390508

Both fixed and being committed to the SVN now. The first is interesting. Although the crash could be resolved, the situation is still a little less than optimal for grouped air units performing that mission. Once done, if not all of them prove useful to carry out the command, they still all go to sleep for the round. However, you CAN now wake them and select the ones that have not spent their action. It might take a bit more to sort it out beyond that so that the unused ones split off from the ones that took action but it may not even be perfectly optimal to do so anyhow... At first, after the immediate fix it was even worse though - you couldn't select the unused planes at all. Now you can at least do that.
 
We have a promotion that is not defined properly

Modularism. The original must've been deleted but the modular xml that defines the capture values for it (faustmouse's module I think) still has it so its coming in as a new but not fully defined promotion as opposed to an additional edit to an existing promotion as it was originally.
 
Modularism. The original must've been deleted but the modular xml that defines the capture values for it (faustmouse's module I think) still has it so its coming in as a new but not fully defined promotion as opposed to an additional edit to an existing promotion as it was originally.

I can either remove it or put the dependencies in which is probably the better option to stop it happening in the future.

The offending one looks like it is ONE_SHOT.

edit Or I could merge it into core.
 
The original was deleted for a reason I would bet. Would probably be better to delete the offending listing. I could be wrong entirely of course.
 
The original was deleted for a reason I would bet. Would probably be better to delete the offending listing. I could be wrong entirely of course.

It is easier to make it fully modular so any deletions will also turn off any modular changes. Just deleting one will leave us open to the same problem if another promotion is deleted or renamed.

Merging into core at a later date is a good idea. There are a number of things we should look at merging into core but not this version.
 
Merging into core at a later date is a good idea. There are a number of things we should look at merging into core but not this version.

I agree, like we talked about this quite a few months ago, I believe.

When do you'll think the next version will be tested and ready??
 
Back
Top Bottom