Yes, we should. Someone give cpr to the earmarking idea. Yes, it would be harder to keep track of the workers without the name changing bit of ptw, but a good governor is supposed to know what's going on in her/his province
11 days, yes. Well, this thread was neglected for the first 11 days and it's a short month.
Alright then, we have discussed the new worker produced doing one and two improvements in its Province before being released from obligation. Which one would be better for the Province? Which one would be better for the Nation? Can there be a compromise? How will the 1 or 2 improvement obligation be monitored and verified? Will all this be the Governors job? These are the questions we, as Governors need to work on.
Since the governors are the ones that will most benefit from having worker actions in their province, it must be up to the to monitor and verify those actions. After the 2 improvements have been done, then he/she no longer has any power over that worker.
I really think that the Priority List will be more managable, as the list will be there to hold the DP accountable. Also, now that have a rail network, there is a better chance that your needs will be met.
Also, please check out my proposal in this thread to ensure that we make the most of our Golden Age. Any questions or comments would be appreciated.
How about a mix of the two? when a province builds the worker, it get's two improvements regardless of those in the list. After that, the worker goes into the federal list system and serves the list until the end of his days. That way, provinces don't need to wait for their turn to come up in the list, while the provinces that can't afford building a worker still get their needs met.
SKILORD awakes! Welcome SKILORD. Will you be starting a new thread for the SW Province? Coffee and doughnuts are over here and relevant issues are being discussed now. BTW, is that a mud pie on your avatar?
Oh, I agree whole-heartedly that a Worker earmarked for 1 improvemnt in the Province they were produced in is quite workable. In fact, if this were to become a Standard, I believe the DP would find it a lot easier to fulfill the Governors' requests.
Can we go with that as a proposal then? It gives some amount of concrete control to the governor without putting an undue workload for anybody tracking workers. General worker management is still the job of the DP except for this one exception.
Well, Governors EA, Goonie, and Cheetah agree with it. I think I heard GBM voice approval long ago. Let's see what the other Governors think, I'll advertise this discussion again.
What kind of Proposal did you have in mind? One for the CoS or CoL?
Yeah, that's not bad, although I think a subtier under CoL C.1.G would be more appropriate. C.1.G states the President organizes worker activities. This proposal would fit more accurately under the organization of worker activities as opposed to the tile development issue.
Some kind of priority list is still a very good idea though. The governors can rank their improvements in the instruction threads based on what is most critical.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Which one would be better for the Nation? 
