adhiraj.bose
Deity
Also @DKVM : I think the conqueror effect auto declares war with new world civs. So it isn't possible to put it to vote.
Also @DKVM : I think the conqueror effect auto declares war with new world civs. So it isn't possible to put it to vote.
I realize that you get free troops upon discovery of the New World but you're still supposed to have a vote!
jackelgull said:Doesn't being first to the America's trigger the conqueror's event? Or has that been axed in this version?
Sanguivorant said:It's still there. And I call dibs on that army if we get it.
jackelgull said:If the conqueror's event is still there, then I suggest optics. But if we get conqueror's, what will we do with the army? Will we conqueror some land in the America's? Who will own these cities?
Spirictum said:We should conquer some land in America and create a new province. I see baseballpie has joined us, but which position are you occupying? I would guess none yet.
If we get the stack of america then baseballpie or someone else, if he gets his position before this happens, should be the governor of that province. With Warrior Code and such a big core population score, we can do this without concerns to stability.
Sanguivorant said:The army that arrives in the Americas belongs to me. baseballpie, if we manage to get cities in the Americas, would you like to own them?
VGL said:wow,Arabian new world.Sounddisasteresgreat!
Spirictum said:(about optics)+1 Province, + Free Army in Americas, +1to water units, faster contact between provinces.
baseball pie said:I would certainly look foward to being the first provincial governor in Arabian Mesoamerica.
Sanguivorant said:And we need an Arabized name for America. Dar al-Majhool (House of the Unknown (Lands))
Manuss said:I don't think one province in America will be enough for everything we'll get.
I guess we'll get three provinces, maybe two.
So names should be something like House of Peru (or andes), house of Mexico etc.
Obviously these names will be in arabian.![]()
DKVM said:Also, land in America is highly unnecessary with how much great land we still have to colonize in Africa and land to conquer everywhere.
Sanguivorant said:That's a good argument actually (answering DKVM). We still have core areas to settle.
We are getting optics, but I would rather have the conqueror stacks squat until we get astronomy. Then we can ship them back home.
jackelgull said:That IMO would be a waste. Who knows how long it will take to ship all those units there. By the time we get them to our continent, all the good places will be settled.
Spirictum said:We have no need to colonize a big area of america. We could get somewhere where there are special resources we won't see in any of our historical areas.
If we manage our stability well, we will be able to settle some Foreign Areas anyway. Why not settle them already in a place where there are unique resources? Being far doesn't matter for stability. Making a city on Congo or on America is the same to Stability. And getting resources mean our core cities may grow more!
A small province in America can be quite interesting to us at least until the Modern Era. While we may be Warrior Code and our Overexpansion Stability is nice we can conquer cities without any stability penalty.
And if we conquer cities and then give them back and make vassals we will get even more stability because we are vassalage. Imagine vassalizing the Aztecs and Incas? That would be the best outcome of an adventure in america.
Imp. Knoedel said:I second Spirictum's thoughts. I vote for Optics followed by Banking. I'm sure we can trade for Education with someone by then.
jackelgull said:I agree. Does anyone know if we recieve settler with the conqueror's event? I just wanted to ask, even thought he answer is likely to be no because there is an area north of Brazil that contain Aluminum that we might need. I think it also has some other resources but I can't name them off the top of my head.
Manuss said:I change my vote to optics.
And we don't receive settlers in the conquerors event. Vassalize american civilizations and then release cities to them is a great idea though. I completely support that.
Sanguivorant said:(quoting Manuss's last post, and bolding the vassalization of american nations part) Manuss is love. Manuss is life.
Or to stop the flow of the game once more before we can conclude the settings of the Council of 1189 to put a forced war into vote?
حائل الثورة!
(Hail the Revolution!)
Hopefully google translate was correct in it's translation.
So, Spirictum, how about inviting us to the new group?
For the record, I want my Crossbowman to be promoted to Drill II.
I accidentally unsubscribed from this thread.
BTW Knoedel, as you moved your Axeman to Rabd al-Handaq, As-Sur lost its Garrison. I presumed you wanted this Crossbowman to be its Garrison, so I named him as Garrison. Do you agree?
Huh? When did I do that? The last council was so long ago, I don't even remembered what my orders were.
What exactly are my available units right now?
A Pikeman and a Crossbowman in As-Sur;
A Garrison Swordsman, a Crossbowman and 2 Catapults in Al-Quds;
A Garrison Axeman in Rabd al-Handaq;
A Swordsman and a Catapult in Babil;