Bugfatty300
Buddha Squirrel
Gelion said:
You should read my article comparing the M-16 and AK-47 that I mentioned above. You'll see that I agree with you on that.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=95569
The Military Machines Image Thread
- Thread starter Gelion
- Start date
You should read my article comparing the M-16 and AK-47 that I mentioned above. You'll see that I agree with you on that.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=95569
Gelion
Retired Captain
I think I based some of my views from your analysisBugfatty300 said:You should read my article comparing the M-16 and AK-47 that I mentioned above. You'll see that I agree with you on that.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=95569
You should do the same for "continuation" rifles such as AK-47 and the like.
Gelion
Retired Captain
Once again I am thrilled by your amount of knowledge. One wonders where you get it all fromfing0lfin said:
Bugfatty300
Buddha Squirrel
fing0lfin said:
That has nothing to do with the AK-47 its self. Its the cartridge. An old SKS could do the same thing.
But your right that an 7.62x39mm is much more powerful than a 5.56x45mm (M-16 cartridge) but probably equal in lethality.
Jawz II
Oh Dear
why dont you all take this discussion to that other topic and leave this one for picture posting?
yeah, im pretty sure they were gonna put them on the bradley, im surprised they didnt, it makes much more sense, you have alot more armour on a bradley, and you get at least one MG for protection against infantry
plus the space means you could have some kind of automatic loader, the way it is now, if you have to stop and get out to reload, its not really a AT vehicle, its a big vehicle mounted rocket launcher!
that might not be as a big a problem if this thing has a really long range, then you can use it as AT artillery! but with that kind of speed it seems unlikely...
anyway here are a few photos
ADATS on M113
ADATS on bradley
VRWCAgent said:
yeah, im pretty sure they were gonna put them on the bradley, im surprised they didnt, it makes much more sense, you have alot more armour on a bradley, and you get at least one MG for protection against infantry
plus the space means you could have some kind of automatic loader, the way it is now, if you have to stop and get out to reload, its not really a AT vehicle, its a big vehicle mounted rocket launcher!
that might not be as a big a problem if this thing has a really long range, then you can use it as AT artillery! but with that kind of speed it seems unlikely...
anyway here are a few photos
ADATS on M113
ADATS on bradley
Sophie 378
Avvie by ybbor
That looks fun. Can I have one? I often see tanks going round the local roads and roundabouts - with indicators and L-plates. 
I'll post pics next time I see one when I have my camera on me; I just find something very laughable in a massive, indestructible-looking, dangerous-looking, road-crushing, ground-shaking, massive-gun-having tank carefully manouvring into the correct lane for a roundabout, with indicators. And L-plates!
I'll post pics next time I see one when I have my camera on me; I just find something very laughable in a massive, indestructible-looking, dangerous-looking, road-crushing, ground-shaking, massive-gun-having tank carefully manouvring into the correct lane for a roundabout, with indicators. And L-plates!@JawzII: If memory serves, the range of the LOSAT is around 5km.
Now, moving on to an ideal home-defense weapon. Everybody should have one mounted on their chimney just in case you have the need to put a lot of hurt on that house 1500 meters away.
The Mk-19 belt-fed automatic 40mm grenade launcher.
Now, moving on to an ideal home-defense weapon. Everybody should have one mounted on their chimney just in case you have the need to put a lot of hurt on that house 1500 meters away.
The Mk-19 belt-fed automatic 40mm grenade launcher.
wow, he was a whole military? lol
Ive fired ALOT of american, canadian french british and soviet weapons, I persoanlly like the american best. Soviet are the most rugged, but american put bullets on target alot more accurately, and thats what counts. So unless u have the info from personal use, please dont be biased until uve dont it yourself. Thats like saying I dont like Fords, but ive never driven one, but i heard that i wont like them
I want one of these
and one of these...cmon santa.
Ive fired ALOT of american, canadian french british and soviet weapons, I persoanlly like the american best. Soviet are the most rugged, but american put bullets on target alot more accurately, and thats what counts. So unless u have the info from personal use, please dont be biased until uve dont it yourself. Thats like saying I dont like Fords, but ive never driven one, but i heard that i wont like them
I want one of these
and one of these...cmon santa.
Jawz II
Oh Dear
VRWCAgent said:
thats what im saying, with a bigass rocket like that, one would think you could squeeze more out of it, it looks like its bigger than the hellfire, and the hellfire has a range of 8km right? why not just put hellfires on a humvee? too expensive?
cause a modern day tank has a range of 4km, right? at least ithe LOSAT probably has a huge warhead.
like a crew served AT launcher, it will kick ass in the defensive role, i think.
@cidknee: that 105mm version of the stryker has to be braced for firing sideways, or so ive been told:
http://www.combatreform.com/MGS_firing_turret_ovr_sideCLOSEUPCHEATINGWITHBRACKET.jpg
Jawz II
Oh Dear
a few SAABs for your viewing pleasure
J21
A21-R
J29 tunnan
J32 lansen
SAAB 35 draken
SAAB 105
SAAB 37 viggen
SAAB 39 gripen
all of them together!
J21
A21-R
J29 tunnan
J32 lansen
SAAB 35 draken
SAAB 105
SAAB 37 viggen
SAAB 39 gripen
all of them together!
MarineCorps
Explosion!
Jawz II said:
Well it's supposed to be able to shoot on the move so I would doubt that. However since we're dealing the with the Stryker it's anyones guess if thats true.
Jawz II
Oh Dear
looks sooo beautiful! 
Similar threads
