Interesting map. So the Turks managed to grab half the island? Nice.
I am not sure I'd describe it with the word "nice". Anyway, if I am not mistaken, the population ratio before the invasion was roughly 20% Turks vs. 80% Greeks. Both sided engaged in ethnic cleansing, but the map shows who was more successful in it.
The OP betrays absolutely no bias whatsoever.
I don't claim to be neutral.
De-facto Turkey is saying goodbye to EU membership.
They don't openly say so, but they are effectively allowing EU to scrap their membership bid.
For which I am grateful.
After the illegal invasion of North Cyprus and illegal settlement of colonist from Anatolia, Turkey well know that respect for Cyprus is one of the top conditions to join EU.
You know, this whole Cyprus issue sheds colourful light at their anti-Israeli posturing. So, they're criticizing Israel for
a) invading a territory settled by another ethnic group;
b) driving some members of this ethnic group out of their homes, seizing their property and making them refugees;
c) settling members of a different ethnic group on the land thus vacated;
d) not wanting to return the occupied territories.
Even if all of that was true and Israel was guilty as charged,
how is that different from what the Turks did on Cyprus? And I am not saying two wrongs make a right, but it reveals the sheer hypocrisy of their position
It's quite puzzling why they are doing it...
Does the government needs to surf over a nationalistic tide to keep itself in power or there is a better, long term, and more coherent plan about it?
Turkey has always been fiercely nationalistic. Now, add a bit of islamic populism into the mix, stir, and
voilà...