Dreadnought
Deity
No, the real ones. I didn't even know fake ones existed. I actually try to follow actual news, and not advertise fake twitter accounts. And I hold other people to that regard.

The rest of the world usually puts this question as "Is it ok to torture a human being?"
And you would like us to do what exactly? Torture an American citizen? Waterboard him? Break his kneecaps? Pull out his fingernails? Starve him? Electrodes to his genitals? Beat him with sticks?
Ask him. Terrorists have a message, a motivation, that they want the public to hear and know. Kaczynski wrote an effing book about why he started blowing stuff up.
Knowing their motivation isnt really going to save lives - getting them to divulge their sources, their networks, who helped them, where those people are, etc. is what will save lives - and he isnt going to just tell us that stuff 'cause we say 'please'.
probably the internet and friendly neighborhood store for this bomb size
Honestly, what does it matter what their motivations were? They murdered people. Try them, execute them (I am assuming a guilty verdict.)
He wasn't a small child. He knew right from wrong and chose wrong. He is totally responsible for his own actions. If my brother tried to get me to do something like this with him, I'd turn him over to the authorities.
Plus, if he's in prison, there's a decent amount of time available to interview him. There's no need to get out the pliars and blowtorch asap.
So if I get people do Bad Things, as long as they know right from wrong, I bear no responsibility for their actions?
You're involved in a conspiracy to commit the crime of course. In fact, I might even say you're the ringleader. That does not in any way lessen their own responsibility for their own actions.
Okay, but if I have more than 0% responsibility for their actions, it's mathematically impossible for them to have 100% responsibility for their actions.
Rofl, no. They still have 100% responsibility; you're just indicating that you have some influence on their choice. There is a difference between influence and responsibility.
I at no point said they didn't have 100% responsibility.
If person A is responsible for X% of action Z, person B is at most responsible for 100%-X of action Z.
I'm not sure if conspiracy is a lesser offense. I think its one of those inchoate crimes that are a lot like felony murder.
Are you willing to appreciate that there might be some nuance involved, or is "there was a bomb" the beginning and end of the story for you?
Which is precisely why the judge and jury are not family members of the victims?
Also, Glenn Beck is going to reveal the conspiracy in like 12 hours from now on Monday.
That a Saudi was somehow involved in the Boston Bombing I think.
Link to video.
I mean, dropping a freakin' nail bomb next to a bunch of kids and their moms is not the behavior of a human being.