gay_Aleks
from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free!
OKCupid.com might be more to his suite in my opinion.
I doubt any of this Anglo-Saxon sites will be able to suit any of my Russian needs, guys.
Let's hope for the best. Feminism is nonsense and nonsense will sooner or later expose itself, just as socialism did. For now, it seems, it is better just to enjoy the life.Hmm...demands subservient, submissive, traditional-gender-role women? Bit tricky to find, methinks. Have you tried the 19th century?
That's why I said in the beginning if civilization wants to survive or, even more, advance it is in the best interest of the said society to provide men with women as this is the strongest incentive for them to participate in it and contribute to it. Or perish, or find a novel ways (feminist society maybe? at which wonders shall retreated men gaze in awe).
Weirdly, women seem to like well-adjusted, emotionally healthy men, who don't blame all of society or womankind for their problems.
That's I am fully agree with. Women are not agents of history, they were not those who started feminism, nor they will be those who put it to the (gory) end.Honestly, men only have themselves to blame for feminism. Feminism basically means that plenty of women have out-maled the males themselves. But it is up to us males to make good for it, rather than blaming women.
...nor they will be those who put it to the (gory) end.
Well, I hope it will be just a change of hearts or something peaceful like that, but if we consider feminism to be a part of broader problem then things are not looking this well. Rotterham seriously shattered my belief in ability of European culture to sort out these problems in orderly manner.I don't really endorse that statement, truth be told.
It seems, people here thinks I am the God or something. Irrelevantly of my actions, feminism is utterly broken; no action on my part can fix it.If finding a girl that meets your standards is too difficult, you might be better off finding a submissive, subservient guy who likes dressing up in women's clothing.
That's why I said in the beginning if civilization wants to survive or, even more, advance it is in the best interest of the said society to provide men with women as this is the strongest incentive for them to participate in it and contribute to it. Or perish, or find a novel ways (feminist society maybe? at which wonders shall retreated men gaze in awe).
Well, if you provided woman to man, it means you've provided man to woman, doesn't it?Why provide men with women, why not provide women with men? It's the women who are doing the birthing after all - shouldn't they be given men by society every couple years so that they can pop another baby out and continue the glorious forward march of society?
Well, if you provided woman to man, it means you've provided man to woman, doesn't it?
That would probably work better.That's amusing.
Next time I will say: "I dislike Islam" and will point out some obvious deficiencies.