Eternals - First off, I have to say that I don't see what all the fuss was about. It was fine. I mean it wasn't great, but it wasn't bad either. I also found many of the criticisms I've heard about it way overblown. For example, I'd heard that the movie leaned too hard into LGBTQ issues/scenes. There was one, ONE, gay kiss and that was it, and even then it was just a little peck like an old married couple kissing each other goodbye for the day. Its funny because before even seeing the film, I told one person who was complaining to me about "
all the LGBTQ stuff" in the film, that for people who did not grow up seeing much same sex relationships depicted in movies, seeing teensy bit might tilt them and make them feel like "Errmahgawd this movie is ALL about gay stuff!!!
" when its really a very minor part of the film... which is exactly how it turned out.
The main complaint I've heard/read was that it didn't reference the MCU, or that it only did it in one throwaway line. Also untrue. Related to that critique, was that the movie didn't really explain why they weren't part of the original MCU movies and why they didn't participate in the Infinity War. Also untrue. We can put aside the fact that we know damn well why they weren't included, ie., because they're new characters in terms of the MCU (not the comics), so they didn't actually exist in the MCU and they are being retroactively inserted. They gave a perfectly fine fig leaf of an explanation for their absence. It wasn't immersion breaking at all, and in fact, for me, it actually helped with immersion because it allowed me to appreciate these characters as separate, doing their own thing, with their own, larger meta-concerns, that were in a sense, on a higher plane than the Infinity War conflict. That's not a new concept in the MCU by any means. The Wizards in Dr. Strange have their own stuff to deal with that most of humanity is either partially or totally unaware of. The TVA is a similar concept, with Kang the Conqueror being another layer within a layer of the same thing. Ego was similarly looking at things from a "higher" plane of existence, its just that he was included in the story-proper, while the Eternals weren't. Another thing I'd compare it to, is the lesser Marvel hero shows like Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, Iron-Fist etc., where they exist in the same universe as the major MCU heroes, but they are doing their own thing with little or no interaction with the major MCU characters. It reminds me of Captain Marvel's throwaway line, about why she didn't help with the Infinity War aftermath... the obvious out-of-story answer being that they hadn't written character yet, but her in-story fig-leaf explanation was that she had other **** to do. Fine, whatever.
The one criticism that I definitely agree with, is that there are too many characters. Way too many. I think a related criticism is that Angelina Jolie and Salma Hayek were underutilized. I think that second issue is related to the first. There was not enough screen time to showcase and introduce all of the characters properly. Another legitimate criticism that is related to this is that they rely too much on flashbacks to introduce/explain the characters so it makes the movie hard to follow. It reminded me a little bit of
Memento where you keep jumping backwards in time. But in
Memento, confusing/disorienting the viewer
is the point, whereas with
Eternals its just annoying, which makes the story even harder to follow, coupled with all the new characters being introduced all at the same time. The other problem is since these are not the major mainstream characters, you don't even have the same emotional investment in getting to know them.
Marvel: Inhumans had a similar problem for me.
Ultimately, I think the film was a perfectly fine superhero film. I will admit that my review is biased by a couple things. For one, I had very low expectations based on so many folks panning it ahead of me seeing it, so it was going to be harder for the film to disappoint me. Second, I watched it twice, because I fell asleep watching it the first time so I missed the climax and the Easter eggs. I have to say that seeing it a second time made me appreciate it much more, because it was so much easier to follow the story and understand who all the characters were and how the story fit in to the larger MCU, plus I saw the Easter eggs, which further tied things together. I'd say its worth watching, and if you already saw it, worth watching again to see if you like it better the second time around.