While We Wait: Writer's Block & Other Lame Excuses

Status
Not open for further replies.
Random comment, a recommendation: Plague, Inc. is a great game. It's like Pandemic II, but better and more fun.

I highly recommend it.
 

Link to video.

Partly I may be attention seeking again, but I am genuinely taking an interest in people and views like this: (look how people laugh around the 5 min mark)


Link to video.

From a more metaphysical viewpoint, I can see systems failing because they have become obstacles to the evolution of human consciousness and experience. The only constant is that we will always keep evolving, and all obstacles and will eventually overcome. Stale and dysfunctional systems will always fall apart eventually.
 
That's not how evolution works though. :p Evolution is a very specific kind of heritable change, and it only really applies when we're talking about genetics. Changes in cultural mindsets and awareness and such are a whole different kettle of fish- they're certainly likely to happen, but I don't see a lot of evidence that such changes will have to take place through collapse.
 
That's not how evolution works though. :p Evolution is a very specific kind of heritable change, and it only really applies when we're talking about genetics. Changes in cultural mindsets and awareness and such are a whole different kettle of fish- they're certainly likely to happen, but I don't see a lot of evidence that such changes will have to take place through collapse.

Or that they would be "progressive" or have anything to do with evolution of human consciousness - you'd think the 20th century would be a pretty convincing refutation of those 19th century utopian theories. Lamarck isn't really much in the intellectual world's favour anymore, either.

I don't doubt the economy is based on "imaginary value" and will collapse sooner or later, mind you. All things end eventually. That's not really a very meaningful revelation, though. Your "sooner or later" or "eventually" might well take centuries, rendering it irrelevant to the current debate (which I admittedly have zero interest in).
 
I don't doubt the economy is based on "imaginary value"

As it has always been. I don't see what's so precious about gold. YMMV.
 
Why do random people randomly get allergy to my cat, with no/little previous experience of cat allergy, at the worst moments.
 
That's not how evolution works though. :p Evolution is a very specific kind of heritable change, and it only really applies when we're talking about genetics. Changes in cultural mindsets and awareness and such are a whole different kettle of fish- they're certainly likely to happen, but I don't see a lot of evidence that such changes will have to take place through collapse.

Ahh, but what happens when the fish from each Kettle inter-breed? What happens when they mix together and can't be told one from the other?

What then?
 
As it has always been. I don't see what's so precious about gold. YMMV.

I'm sorry if you thought I was implying otherwise. :p

All economics more complex than simple barter are based almost purely on arbitrary belief, yes.
 
All economics more complex than simple barter are based almost purely on arbitrary belief, yes.

Why bother with the qualifier? :mischief:
 
Ahh, but what happens when the fish from each Kettle inter-breed? What happens when they mix together and can't be told one from the other?

What then?
Biologically speaking, the cultural mindset fish is a different species than the evolution fish, and thus they cannot interbreed. There is only a limited chance of selective pressures driving these two different lineages into convergent evolution that would make them physically indistinguishable, and even then one could identify them through straightforward molecular biology.

My folksy turns of phrase will stand up to your simplistic prodding. ;)

Isn't barter also based on arbitrary belief?

Arbitrary belief with someone you can kick in the groin, which could theoretically serve as a useful check/balance.
 
Isn't barter also based on arbitrary belief?

Arguably. It just seems a little less arbitrary than using a substitute for actual goods. Also, what Iggy said. :p
 
Try playing, you might enjoy it :)
 
It's like an IOT but with more difficult rules.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom