I honestly don't know the answer to the OP's question but for the love of God I hope we stop using "metrosexual" as it's a pointless word that doesn't deserve to exist.
edit: Oh no! I thought I was being clever. But I find there is such a word.
How about Mythosexual? (someone who lies about sex) Kryptosexual? (someone who likes sex in private) Kleptosexual? ( someone who likes to steal kisses)
Also, if it is about what species one digs, and if we dig our own - that would be pretty homo, no?
It also fails to recognize the sufficient dose of liberalism to truly appreciate the flexibility of sexuality, which is evidently moving beyond social conventions,
What for instance about bestiality? It sure isn't appropriate to rape an animal, but you can still have yourself be served without anyone taking harm. If we really want to be rational and compassionate about it - have a heart for our fellow bestiality lovers. On Boston Legal it was claimed studies show 10% have fantasies of the kind. Make loving life forms the term's criteria. So we can all be united in our homosexuality.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.