Frankly she deserved to lose. I know it's not why she lost but she voted for bank deregulation and then got all indignant when questioned about it and tried to act like us city folk just don't understand small towns.
CNN: House D134-131R
And from the state with the public bank, no less! The one that arose as a brainchild of the original populists. She deserved to lose even if it cost the Dems the Senate, provided that there were some way to tie her comment to her loss. Eff her.
I'm sort of sad about that, with no more Jerry Brown as governor
California Uber Alles no longer holds true.
Me too. I mean, the thing is that I have two nieces. Very young, just 3 and 1 right now. But my sister and her husband are both very goody-two-shoes. He's a rural Iowan pastor's son, and she's a wallflower, and I'm just not sure. I'm hoping that both of them manage to repudiate their parents' status, but, it's just...
The thing is, I can't shake the belief that I'm going to have an uncool niece. Maybe two of them. It will probably fall to me to keep them safe from the suede-denim secret police. Many of my best friends are hipsters, so I could spot suede-denim types at a distance of half a mile.
But will I even want to save them? I don't like the way my sister turned out. With my chemistry background, formal and informal, I'd be in perfect position to save my nieces from organic poison gas. But, like, do I want to?
It played out in the senate. And who won that election?
Except that literally no one expected the Senate to flip to the Democrats before the Kavanaugh hearings.
Nope (Lex)/Yep (inno), the Senate side is a GOP win. A neutral outcome would have looked like 50/50 (really 51/50, -1) to 52/48 (+1) for the GOP. The Republicans overthrew not just Heitkamp (as expected) but also Donnelly, McCaskill, and probably Nelson. It's possible they will hold onto either or both of Nevada and Arizona, as well, in addition to Texas and Tennessee as expected. It's looking fairly likely that Tester will lose now as well. This is a worse night than was expected on the Senate side for the Dems. Not worse than was believed to be possible, but worse than their average expected outcome.
From what we saw in polls (candidate support numbers and engagement) by Republicans in the aftermath of Kavanaugh's confirmation vs. before, I'm fairly confident that there was a net-negative effect to the Democrats from the #MeToo attempt against Kavanaugh. As you (inno) said, this does now appear to have been a serious mistake.
I'm a strong opponent of American-style identity politics and also a strong opponent of the Republican Party. I'm more the latter than the former, so I'd be all in favor of Democratic identity brinkmanship if it were reliably effective. But it's not, so...