Using statistical evidence to generate reasonable suspicion, and then concentrating investigative resources on those anomalies is going to be considered a good idea. I definitely wouldn't mind looking at the more unlikely events and then examining the protocols there. That just creates good protocols.
But saying "there are weird statistics" is going to be p-hacking. So, suggesting a series of conspiracies off of that p-hacking should be done carefully.
The taxpayer-funded Whitehouse has been lying about the election, overwhelmingly. And that multitude of lies is damaging the Republic just as much as the cabal of conspiracies are.