2020 US Election (Part One)

Status
Not open for further replies.
would that be homophobic?
In itself? Maybe. Mostly it's just weird. But it's hard to imagine why anyone would want to do it unless they were homophobic, whereas it's easy to imagine why a person might want to promote LGBT candidates without any ill-will towards people who are not LGBT.
 
you mean other than discriminating against them
Look out guys, we got a snowflake over here!
Let's all be super careful about giving trigger warnings, lest Berzerker gets triggered by the blatant discrimination when pro-LGBT groups give to LGBT candidates.
 
It saddens me when people self-segregate, but I understand. Thats just how evolution made us. I've never called anyone a snowflake, so if the hypocrisy detector is on you might be the trigger.

In Biden news, Joe's really upset so many black men, and women for that matter, are in prison (because of Joe).

and Trayvon Martin and his hoodie could have been a poet laureate or a gangbanger. We'll see if Obama's coat tails can save Joe after a few years.
 
and Trayvon Martin and his hoodie could have been a poet laureate or a gangbanger.
I might just be finding this part of that post the single most offensive one from it, but, man, seriously, go see a specialist to help you with your anger issues.
 
Given how much you talk about him, I'm starting to think you have a crush on Joe Biden.
Spoiler :
 
No, I'm in love with Tulsi

But since I rarely have anything good to say about Biden I'd think people who dont like him either would agree. Maybe if I criticize him enough the Democrats here will support him to spite me.
 
Odd you are supportive of Tulsi Gabbard given her position on military interventionism starts to smell a bit funky one you take a sniff:
Jacobin said:
It’s a point she’s repeated again and again. Responding to questions from Honolulu Civil Beat in 2012, Gabbard said that “the best way to defeat the terrorists is through strategically placed, small quick-strike special forces and drones — the strategy that took out Osama Bin Laden.” She told Fox in 2014 that she would direct “the great military that we have” to conduct “unconventional strategic precise operations to take out these terrorists wherever they are.” The same year, she told Civil Beat that military strategy must “put the safety of Americans above all else” and “utilize our highly skilled special operations forces, work with and support trusted foreign partners to seek and destroy this threat.”

“In short, when it comes to the war against terrorists, I’m a hawk,” she told the Hawaii Tribune-Herald last year.

In other words, Gabbard would continue the Obama administration’s foreign policy, which itself was a continuation (and in some ways ramping up) of George W. Bush’s foreign policy. She would keep up the drone bombing of seven Muslim countries in the Middle East and North Africa — perhaps even expand it — while also relying more on special operations forces, which are already raiding, assassinating, and gathering intelligence in 70 percent of the world’s countries.

Drones killed hundreds of civilians over Obama’s eight years, while special operations forces like SEAL Team 6 — which Gabbard specifically name-checked in her positive allusion to the bin Laden raid — are known for their fair share of brutality. It was “quick-strike special forces” conducting a “strategic precise operation,” to use Gabbard’s term, that a little less than four months ago killed thirty civilians in a botched raid in Yemen.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/05/tulsi-gabbard-president-sanders-democratic-party
 
Lex already posted that and my response was the drone war will disappear once we do
If you believe that, I have some beachfront property in Arizona and a bridge in New York to sell you.
 
The reason terrorists attacked us is because we had an army in Saudi Arabia to enforce sanctions on Iraq. If we leave why will they keep attacking us? No more need for drones. Yeah, I believe that. But I also believe much of our economy and political system relies on war so she wont be getting any job that could seriously make an impact.
 
That's not a good argument to avoid Fox News though and that window will continue sliding if the Dems don't get in front of conservative eyeballs themselves.

People who watch that much Fox News are never, ever voting Democrat. Those who have been main-lining it for years are more or less brainwashed at this point. I've had to cut off friendships in the past few years because certain people simply would not stop yammering on and on about whatever they last saw. It's like 1984's "Ten Minute Hate" but instead it runs 24/7.

That's going to, or maybe already has, backfired on them. The nitwits on Fox call Pelosi, and Biden socialists. That is so absurd they're losing the ability to use it as a slur.

This is only true for those persons who are engaging in "the discourse" with an intellectually honest and meaningful definition of socialism. In Republican-land socialism isn't bad because their free market bullfeathers has been "proven" to work better (it doesn't; this only came in vogue because wealthy men bought off schools to spew it). Socialism is bad because their media outlets have tied the concept to high profile examples of failed/failing nation states and atheism.

Sorry for the late reply, but these were important points and worth addressing.
 
People who watch that much Fox News are never, ever voting Democrat. Those who have been main-lining it for years are more or less brainwashed at this point. I've had to cut off friendships in the past few years because certain people simply would not stop yammering on and on about whatever they last saw. It's like 1984's "Ten Minute Hate" but instead it runs 24/7.

This is only true for those persons who are engaging in "the discourse" with an intellectually honest and meaningful definition of socialism. In Republican-land socialism isn't bad because their free market bullfeathers has been "proven" to work better (it doesn't; this only came in vogue because wealthy men bought off schools to spew it). Socialism is bad because their media outlets have tied the concept to high profile examples of failed/failing nation states and atheism. Sorry for the late reply, but these were important points and worth addressing.
That's not true. A bunch of them voted for Hillary, for example. Otherwise she could not have gotten 48% of the vote.

J
 
That's not true. A bunch of them voted for Hillary, for example. Otherwise she could not have gotten 48% of the vote.

J
Fox gets a lot of viewers but its a big stretch to say you couldn't get 48% with no regular Fox viewers. They get about 2.5m viewers during primetime. None of which you'd need to get 48% of 138m.
 
Harris may have killed her chances at the WH. She can still win the primaries because her recent sins wont hurt her with the base, but she actually argued for busing... now. And before backtracking with a lawyerly response she argued for ending private insurance.
 
Harris may have killed her chances at the WH. She can still win the primaries because her recent sins wont hurt her with the base, but she actually argued for busing... now. And before backtracking with a lawyerly response she argued for ending private insurance.
Harris is neck and neck with Biden in some of the new polling coming out. i think she'll eclipse him soon and then it will be her and Warren in the lead.
 
He got hurt but she's still competing with the progressives for the anti-establishment, anti-Biden vote. Looks like a 4 way with Biden center-right, Harris center-left and Sanders and Warren to her left. The only one I could support is Warren, the other 3 just have too much baggage. Biden's carrying the most with the drug war and Iraq followed by Sanders (drug war) and Harris (cop, AG, drug war).

But she is calling for pot legalization, that would help her image in both the primaries and general election since I doubt Biden and Trump will go there with her. If Harris and Biden can consistently finish ahead of Warren and Sanders they might drop leaving Harris with an easier path to the nomination. I'd agree she will likely win if its between her and Joe.

I want to know what these people will do on foreign policy, I suspect Biden will be the most objectionable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom