Altered Maps X: Ten Time's a Altered Map

Status
Not open for further replies.
Spoiler World Map 0000Z 01SEP1919 :
bG2Dp.png

Disclaimers:

Does not represent internal Russian rebellions. [Major: Basmachi, Anarchist/Ukraine, SRs/Great Russian countryside, Various/Caucasus, Don and Kuban Cossacks/Kalmyk Steppe, Ma Clans/Xinjiang]
Does not represent Irish rebellions.
Does not represent disorder in colonial territories newly acquired. [e.g.: Libya/UK and France, Somaliland and Eritrea/UK, Emirate of Makkah Protectorate/UK]
Does not accurately represent Italian civil conflict.
Does not represent Greek civil war. [Republicans/Crete and Cyclades vs. Royalists/Mainland, Chios, and Mytilene. Civil war ends with Royalist victory in spring 1920.]
 
interesting map. my best guess is that the central powers never started WWI. or if it did start, it clearly got different. the ottoman Empire flopped as usual, and china is in civil war. uh... Federalists in the north, Royalists in the south?
 
Greater Bulgaria and rump Turkey makes me sad.
 
Turkey in 1914:

Ottoman_Empire_1914_h.PNG


I think that's some important territory lost there.

oh. oops. i was saying compared to modern turkey. my mistake.

oh, and turkey apparently didn't have any European territory besides some Thrace territories in 1914.
 
The thing is Dachs' map represents an alternate 1919, so it's not comparable to 1914
 
Just a map I found a few minutes ago:

TURKEY%20AFTER%20WWI.jpg


---

Why? Please don't use the Byzantium claim.

Every square metre of land occupied by Turkey was taken from others through aggression.

Leaving that fact aside, they have absolutely no claims on anything in the Balkans, which was basically a collection of Turkish colonies, against conquered by force.
 
So what every civilization does that, and I think they have a claim on Albania, Bosnia, Sandzak and Kosovo, the Turkicizied it.
 
So what every civilization does that, and I think they have a claim on Albania, Bosnia, Sandzak and Kosovo, the Turkicizied it.

What is "turkicized" about these places? Bosnia - Slavic population, Islam as the predominant religion; Albania - non-Turkic population, again largely Muslim, ditto Kosovo. Religion stopped being a solid basis for a territorial claim centuries ago.
 
We aren't the same ethnic group but we share cultural similarities, if not much of our culture is the same. When Bosnia was token over by the Austro-Hungarian empire in 1878 thousands fled to Turkey.
 
Can any country really be said to have any objective claims to anything anywhere? It's all power games, at the end of the day, we're just compelled to buttress it with halfway convincing ideology. Ethno-linguistic certainly hasn't had any historic role as a trump card, not least because it's something rather more plastic than is generally admitted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom