The way I was raised (which might have been indoctrination, I don't know) is that yes, Israel did do awful things in 1948, but they were necessary for the protection of the state.
That's right. Most foreign impositions require violence.
I'm NOT defending forcing people to leave their homes and become refugees, but I DO support my state. Maybe blame Hitler for making so many Jews leave Europe and cling to safety of Israel, or maybe the 36-39 Arab Revolts that made it so Britain didn't want to give the Palestinians a country.
No, you shouldn't blame the victim or the other aggressors. In fact, Israel was created by Europeans to rid Europe of Jews. It's based on race war, pure and simple, and that's what makes it wrong and unsustainable.
What's more disturbing about this is that the Nazis used the same identity politics that Israel uses to defend its racist policies.
Are you attacking me, Israel, or America? FYI, Israel is not a regime. It is the only democracy in the Middle East (currently). And the only times Israel has ever attacked first was because war was about to be declared. Take the 6 Day War for example. Israel bombed Egyptian bombers right before they could take off and bomb innocent civilians. How is that "moral terror"?
Something being a regime has nothing to with the presence or lack of democracy. What a great example of your boxed-in mentality. Here you debate with some fool about what determines "Jewishness" (you're right in that debate, by the way, Judaism is simply whatever the self-proclaimed want it to be) but you fail to see the larger picture.
Israel indiscriminately targets civilians in their bombing raids. This is illustrated in the casualties in the war on Gaza. The fact that the "other side" commits the same makes absolutely no difference. What does matter is the generation of the conflict: it didn't start in the hazy days of King David, but in the 1800s with a Jewish-Nationalist movement. It's anti-pluralist and so any "democracy" it possesses is explicitly fascist.
I don't think you're a bad person, and I don't mean to attack you. The fact that you try to draw the line at attacks on civilians says as much. But your unwavering support for a nation state which has no interest in protecting the lives of civilians subject to its rule, occupation or attacks is a fatal flaw which will make you ultimately defend policies and conflicts which are diametrically opposed to your moral compass.
If you look at the history of Israel and its relations to its neighbors, its disturbing. The statistics can only tell so much; simply watching events as they unfold tell the story succinctly. Whenever talks are in progress to swap land or halt settlement expansion (that is the annexation of more Palestinian land by "facts on the ground") forces within Israeli politics (settler movement, probably) force through more expansionism and more incursions. The military steps up its attacks on Palestinian territories when the latter agree to ceasefires or unilaterally halt aggressions.
This is because the conflict is desperately needed by the Israeli regime. It serves as a cover for more expansionism, and more attacks, and ultimately more Palestinian retaliation which does wonders to feed into the same.
Defenders of the Israeli regime (particularly likudniks) consistently use the "right for Israel to exist" and to exist as a "Jewish state" to argue for more military aid, and as a demand for peace. It's not enough that Palestinians have to agree not to fight the nation strangling their economy - they have to act like that nation should exist, on land the former had lived on for centuries, as "Jewish." It's race baiting, and that is what Israel has always been about. If you are of strong moral fiber, you should oppose it.