TV just quoted Paris Police that all 4 attackers are killed near Bataclan and no one is at large now. How can it be possible? Only 4 people pulled 7 nearly simultaneous attacks?
Why is it whenever someone says "I [really] x, but y..." the y always ends up rendering the x completely disingenuous?
So I just read that Hollande stated France will "lead the fight and it will be merciless" in his address to the French people. Can any French posters here tell me what they think this means? Will France actually be going to war over this? Will we just see airstrikes and maybe some commando action against ISIS, or would we see large scale military operations maybe even reaching the point of all-out invasion of ISIS territory?
Why is this fatuous rubbish allowed in the thread but I'm not allowed to talk about the actual history of the Iraq invasion that led to chaos, strongerxand emboldened radical Islsmists, ISIS, and radicalised blowback in the West?While I respect your good intentions, I can't help but point out the fact that if you choose to continue accepting of masses of Muslims into western countries, events such as these will certainly result from it. Sometimes, there is no good answer to a problem. There is just the one that is the least unappealing. As I said before, I sympathize with the plight of refugees, but I would not trade 158 Frenchmen or any westerners for the lot of them.
I was just talking to my colleagues earlier about how huge, coordinated terrorist attacks are no longer possible due to better intelligence. Then I read about how 160 people are dead in many locations. Who screwed up and missed any sign of coordination of these attacks?
Indonesia is the only major Muslim country where Islam arrived largely by trade rather than sword. Killing subjugated infiedels is haram, religious tax on gyaurs is a better alternative, again proscribed by scripture, and not by statesmen.This is nonsense. Islamic extremism wasn't born out of nowhere. The seeds for an extremists and violent understanding of Islam were planted only in the last what 60 or something years. If what you are saying is true then it makes no sense that Islam ever thrived as a culture for the other odd 1300 years or so, since I'd guess according to you they don't do anything but think about murdering infidels.
Does this attack even have anything to do with all the refugees that have been coming into Europe? Other than it's consequences for them I suppose..
So I just read that Hollande stated France will "lead the fight and it will be merciless" in his address to the French people. Can any French posters here tell me what they think this means? Will France actually be going to war over this? Will we just see airstrikes and maybe some commando action against ISIS, or would we see large scale military operations maybe even reaching the point of all-out invasion of ISIS territory?
PARIS — Prime Minister Manuel Valls declared Saturday that France was at war with radical Islam after the harrowing sieges that led to the deaths of three gunmen and four hostages the day before. New details emerged about the bloody final confrontations, and security forces remained on high alert.
“It is a war against terrorism, against jihadism, against radical Islam, against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity,” Mr. Valls said during a speech in Évry, south of Paris.
So I just read that Hollande stated France will "lead the fight and it will be merciless" in his address to the French people. Can any French posters here tell me what they think this means? Will France actually be going to war over this? Will we just see airstrikes and maybe some commando action against ISIS, or would we see large scale military operations maybe even reaching the point of all-out invasion of ISIS territory?
Oh, yes. It only seems that way because you don't agree with people and their point of view at such times. In this particular case, if you valued your own countrymen more than any number of foreigners, you would not take issue with the statement, but as it were, you would rather condemn your own country (and others) to endless terror attacks for the sake of being an ineffective humanitarian.
Glad I could help.
Our governments and judicial systems have decided that it's more important to safeguard their boring internet and phone conversations than prevent such attacks. In many cases, the intelligence that we used to rely on to protect us from such things is no longer available.
Indonesia is the only major Muslim country where Islam arrived largely by trade rather than sword. Killing subjugated infiedels is haram, religious tax on gyaurs is a better alternative, again proscribed by scripture, and not by statesmen.
Indonesia is the only major Muslim country where Islam arrived largely by trade rather than sword. Killing subjugated infiedels is haram, religious tax on gyaurs is a better alternative, again proscribed by scripture, and not by statesmen.
Oh, yes. It only seems that way because you don't agree with people and their point of view at such times. In this particular case, if you valued your own countrymen more than any number of foreigners, you would not take issue with the statement, but as it were, you would rather condemn your own country (and others) to endless terror attacks for the sake of being an ineffective humanitarian.
Glad I could help.
While warmongers are hardly blameless let's not blame ourselves for nut job terrorists.Thanks once again to George Bush and Tony Blair for taking Al-Qaeda's bait and really starting this horrific cycle.
):
Why is this fatuous rubbish allowed in the thread but I'm not allowed to talk about the actual history of the Iraq invasion that led to chaos, strongerxand emboldened radical Islsmists, ISIS, and radicalised blowback in the West?
"I care about the refugees but not enough to actually do anything to help them."
I doubt it will cause any racism but fear of crazy fundie terrorists, probably.I really hope this doesn't cause more hatred, racism and reprisal attacks.