GhostWriter16
Deity
If Obama was an MD, would you call him Dr. Obama?
First off, he's the president, so no, I'd call him President Obama.
Secondly, if he were NOT the President, I wouldn't consider him worthy of any honorable title whatsoever. He's a bald-faced liar.
MisterCooper has lost it again!
@GhostWriter: there is such things as black fascists. Ever heard of Idi Amin?
Although I should point out that before people mistake me I am not calling Obama a fascist. Heck I did not call the Republican Party who I despise fascists.
As for the next election I predict that the Democrats may have a chance. Hilliary Clinton has proven herself to be good in diplomacy and that is what we Brits like in our US presidents...
Yes, there are black fascists, but would they really be "Nazis"? That was more tongue in cheek though.
We're going to need some citations to back up the first claim - that Obama's actually a liberal. Because from over here, in NYC, he sure looks conservative
Also, aren't small government liberals simply 'Libertarians'? Isn't that the whole point of libertarianism? Of course, any libertarian that wants to determine the acceptable methods of stimulating the pubic nerve or which medical procedures a small business may specialize in is certainly NOT a libertarian, right?
I guess that depends on how you define "Liberal." That's a valid question I think. I consider being in favor of abortion (Especially partial birth abortion) being legal, supporting gay marriage, redistribution of wealth, exc. as "Liberal" regardless of whether you agree with them or not. Now, I guess you might say he's "Not quite liberal enough" and you could probably find other conservative policies he supports (Of course, that's all the "Bad" stuff like foreign wars, patriot act, exc. which is one reason why I can't stand the guy, I feel like he takes the worst from both.)
As for a Libertarian being a small government liberal, Libertarian and classical liberal are the same thing really. Truth be told, I won't claim to be 100% affiliated with either, although I do think the government, or at least the CENTRAL government, should be about 10-20% of what it is. If "liberalism" only applies to social issues, that would be true, as a "Small government" liberal would want a small government in economic issues too. Truth be told however, liberal politicians almost universally support a bigger government on both economic AND social issues.