Bill O'Reilly Makes A Fool Of Himself Yet Again

[Formaldehyde]

just google "huffington post lies" and u will get tons of examples...

In other words, you can't really find any credible ones? Or that it is almost impossible to separate the obvious lies and deliberate distortions from what might actually be evidence that they do the same as their internet critics?

I suggest you re-read that section in which Forma mentioned "truth and enlightenment" because you don't seem to have interpreted it correctly. The whole is more than the sum of its parts.

It happens so frequently that it can hardly be considered to be unintentional.

 

[Behind The Mask]

I don't care much for this foxnews huff post stuff...

But in regards to Stewart and O'Reilly I did find Stewart was accurate in describing the hypocrisy present in fox news...

I'm not saying any other news source isn't quilty of the same, but with Fox News denying the claim I do feel Stewart did prove Fox News as guilty as any other.

 

[SG-17]

I think this is yet another classic example that Bill O'Reilly is simply far too bigoted and deceitful to have any pubilc platform whatsoever to spew his own drivel. He deliberately tried to give the impression that HuffPost had written the comment, instead of some idiot on the internet, which he then he incorrectly tried to ascribe to "far-left Nazi" HuffPost propaganda.


What do you think?

Sounds like a few people here.

 

[useless]

Fox "news" isn't even a REAL news source, it's entertainment legally as well. I remember they had a courtcase and used the "But we're entertainment, not news" plea etc...

 

[duckstab]

In other words, you can't really find any credible ones? Or that it is almost impossible to separate the obvious lies and deliberate distortions from what might actually be evidence that they do the same as their internet critics?

It happens so frequently that it can hardly be considered to be unintentional.

On DailyKos there was once a whole thread showing something like 10 screenshots from Fox where some disgraced Republican like Larry Craig appeared with a (D) next to his name. Once or twice is plausibly accidental, more than that you're flat-out lying.

 

[useless]

 

[bernie14]

In other words, you can't really find any credible ones? Or that it is almost impossible to separate the obvious lies and deliberate distortions from what might actually be evidence that they do the same as their internet critics?

frankly, i did not bother to even look through the search, but then again, i am not the one claiming the objective worthiness of one source over the other...however, what i do find very interesting is the way both you and card edited my original post (distorted), sorta helping me prove that exact point.....

in any case, "proof" as i see it, has to to with "facts"...u can turn to any "news" source and 80-90% of what u get will be actual happenings (facts) the rest, is opinion....please dont confuse opinion that u happen to agree with as fact

 

[Camikaze]

You know I'm pretty sure O'Reilly making a fool of himself here is fairly independent of who actually reported it. It's kinda nice how O'Reilly will attempt to actually address the points directed at him, be he totally missed the point here.

 

[Brian Shanahan]

Sounds like a few people here.

And they even share his political and social viewpoints, wow such a coincidence, I'd have never guessed.

 

[Formaldehyde]

frankly, i did not bother to even look through the search, but then again, i am not the one claiming the objective worthiness of one source over the other....

You claimed it "works both ways". You claimed that merely googling provides "plenty of examples" that Huff Post lies. Yet you still haven't been able to show that either statement is actually true.

however, what i do find very interesting is the way both you and card edited my original post (distorted), sorta helping me prove that exact point.....

I'm sure you probably think it does. But that obviously doesn't mean it is actually true, any more than the rest of your comments in this thread.

 

[El_Machinae]

I really doubt this is true. It seems like anti-FOX propaganda, because it's so outrageous. I wonder if there's any way to determine if this is true or not.

 

[ParadigmShifter]

There's videos of the clips on youtube.

 

[El_Machinae]

I am boggled that there's no mitigating context.
I mean, Jesus, shouldn't that be a death knell of reputability?

 

[ParadigmShifter]

I think they claimed it was a humorous joke sort of thing.

EDIT: Here ya go


Link to video.

 

[bernie14]

You claimed it "works both ways". You claimed that merely googling provides "plenty of examples" that Huff Post lies. Yet you still haven't been able to show that either statement is actually true.

I'm sure you probably think it does. But that obviously doesn't mean it is actually true, any more than the rest of your comments in this thread.

i know u r......

but what am i?.....

 

[Bill3000]

i know u r......

but what am i?.....

Are you really 48 years old? Because you seem to be acting 35 years younger than that.

 

[bernie14]

Are you really 48 years old? Because you seem to be acting 35 years younger than that.

if i would show you for a fact that i was, would u change your opinion?

 

[Berzerker]

"They do it too" conveniently misses the point, kinda hard to be impressed by the intellect that came up with that rebuttal...

 

[Bill3000]

if i would show you for a fact that i was, would u change your opinion?

Huh. I didn't really think it was possible for a man to completely miss the point of my post. I'm unimpressed.

 

[choxorn]

Are you really 48 years old? Because you seem to be acting 35 years younger than that.

35 years younger? You give him too much credit.