Define "Left".

I'm aware of Romney/Bain. Still don't get the reference. Having a dumb day, need more caffeine.
Romney earned money for years during which he was officially the CEO of Bain Capital, but during which he was also allegedly not actually working there or making company policy.
 
Romney earned money for years during which he was officially the CEO of Bain Capital, but during which he was also allegedly not actually working there or making company policy.

Thanks!
edit: don't forget he parked it in the caymans;). so much for believing in america. Can't even put his money where his multiple residencies are.
 
Nope!
 
Authoritarian guilt-ridden collectivism that opposes free speech.

You probably shouldn't click "Submit Reply" if your posts look anything like this, just some advice.
 
Nope!
 
Nope!
 
What case? It said post your perceptions so I did, then I get bloody heckled about it.
Your case as in your perception of what left-wing means to you.

Such a warped vision, and an admittance it really was complying with the OP's request, instead of provoking, shocking or just trolling. If you'd be trolling, you would not have that inane perception. Hence: that doesn't help your case.

I hope I was clear enough this time :)
 
Authoritarian guilt-ridden collectivism that opposes free speech.

You mean the authoritarian left?

The left is a ecomonic scale.

The authoritarian right also opposes free speech.

The authoritarian centre also oppose free speech.

Do not presum things in such... simple notions. Fanaticism blinds one's logic processes.
 
The left DOES reward productivity, since the state is expected to provide so much more than a right-wing state.

Oxymoronic since the government isnt really productive at anything.

Yeah all those people with full time jobs that get cancer but can't afford the treatment because the private healthcare market wildly inflates prices in this country.....they are so unproductive it's rediculous.

MobBoss, you're a veritable goldmine. Please keep ignoring relevant, well thought-out rebutals to you in favor of zingy meaningless one-liners.:goodjob:

The exception doesnt disprove the rule, bub. I dont mind helping out people who truly deserve it; but until you manage to come up with a system that does this and eliminates all the known fraud, waste and abuse found in such government programs then its hard to argue that such programs dont indeed reward people that choose to be unproductive and live off your dime.
 
What case? It said post your perceptions so I did, then I get bloody heckled about it.

The lefties on this board tend to be a tad more touchy than other folks, I wouldn't worry about it.

I disagree. Let them open their mouths and remove all doubt.

Who is this "them" you speak of? Are you grouping all people who don't follow your political ideology into one category?
 
23747d1289945872-why-not-let-tsa-grab-your-junk-do-you-have-something-hide-oh-boy-here-we-go-again.jpg
 
Oxymoronic since the government isnt really productive at anything.

I am afraid I have to claim "naiv" on the use of generalisations. Goverment organsies the go ahead for insrastructure yes? And your taking goverment to mean all goverments. Franch seems to have a effecient goverment. The Royal Mail in Britian does it job. Civil servants allow effeicent management. And if am not mistaken is not the armed forces employed by the goverment? Do not presume that all is of the public sector is dirt in work, just as the private sector is this solution to everything the right wing fanatics keep claiming. After all the army are doing a good job in serving in the Olympics. G4S on the other hand...



The exception doesnt disprove the rule, bub. I dont mind helping out people who truly deserve it; but until you manage to come up with a system that does this and eliminates all the known fraud, waste and abuse found in such government programs then its hard to argue that such programs dont indeed reward people that choose to be unproductive and live off your dime.

All systems can be exploited though, so the "elimates all the known fraud, waste and abuse" can be... problamatic as there is always to be a unknown.

The abuse of welfare is caused by a vocal minority. You will find the media likes bad news above goods news and like to... exploit this. This is especilly in forms of the Daily Mail (or Dailly Fail in accurate naming) in Britian and the many tools of the Murdoch Empire.

Also you lived on welfare? It... is not a palace sum. In Britian the only reason why it is worth more to not work then work for the high end of the working class and the poor end of the middle class is due to the Conserative's "tax reform" plans. They are the ones who are cutting taxes only for the very rich while the rest have to suffer.

Ironically the figure who introduced the world's first welfare system was a (smart, unfanatical) conserative. I will give 10 points to who ever tells me who first introduced welfare. Here is a clue: you should have meet him in a certain game..

Who is this "them" you speak of? Are you grouping all people who don't follow your political ideology into one category?

I see many of the so called "right" prove to be just as touchy as you claim the so called "left" to be.
 
Back
Top Bottom